Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: hindu marriges validation of proceedings act 1960 Court: rajasthan Year: 1985 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.039 seconds)

Sep 03 1985 (HC)

Retired Contributory Provident Fund Holders Association Vs. State of R ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-03-1985

Reported in : 1986(1)WLN633

..... they have resulted in infringement of the fundamental rights under articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. it is also repelled.9. having over-ruled the preliminary objections, i proceed to examine the writ petition on merits.10. the principal question is whether the state of rajasthan should be directed to afford opportunity to the government servants, who are ..... retired cpf holders, thus, have been divided into two classes based on their date of retirement, and the precise question, therefore, is whether this classification is permissible and hence valid. it is settled by the catena of the cases of the highest court of the country inclusive of the decision referred to here-in-above, that in order to pass ..... who were in service on the date of the order:----------------------------------------------------------------ex. no. date of order date of liberalisation of pension after 30-9-1954----------------------------------------------------------------ex. r1-1 13-1-1960 after 30-9-1954ex. anx. 9 26-9-1964 1-3-1964anx. 10 9-5-1969 1-9-1968ex. rl/3 5-3-1980 21-1-1980----------------------------------------------------------------vide ex ..... part it is declared that the judges (including the chief justice) of the high court are entitled to pension as computed under the high court judges (conditions of services) act, 1954 (as amended) irrespective of the date of retirement. the date october 1,1974, continues to be relevant as being one from which the liberalised pension became operative under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 1985 (HC)

Shambhu Dutt Shastri Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-10-1985

Reported in : 1986(2)WLN713

..... was transferred by a registered sale-deed by the erstwhile ruler of alwar in favour of her highness the maharani of alwar on 10th october, 1960. upto 10th october 1960, the ruler has not claimed any compensation or rent and there is nothing on the record to show that any compensation was claimed by the ..... show that when the representations, if any, were made. it is an admitted position that the maharaja of alwar executed the sale-deed on 10th october, 1960 in favour of her highness of the state of alwar. the covenant had been entered into in the year 1949 and, for 11 years the property ..... so long as they are required for the urpose.3. the his highness of alwar gifted this property to her highness vide gift-deed dated 10th october, 1960 (ex. 2). this fact is also not in dispute.4. on behalf of the state, written statement was filed and thereafter the court considering the pleadings ..... that they had only asked for some thing and, that was granted by the plaintiff. their lordships interpreted the provisions of section 70 of the contract act and came to the conclusion that from these facts it cannot be inferred that they were allowed to occupy building free of any obligation to pay rent. ..... ruler of the erstwhile state of alwar. this conduct also shows that the intention of the parties was that the act was gratuitous in character and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 1985 (HC)

The State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Duduwala and Company

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-08-1985

Reported in : 1985(1)WLN715

..... : air1962mp342 . it was held in that case that the minimum wages (madhya pradesh amendment and validation) act, 1961 was a valid piece of legislation as both the principal act, namely the central act and the m.p. act could co-exist in the state of madhya pradesh. certain notifications issued by the madhya pradesh government ..... the advisory boards on account of the non-inclusion of independent members. however, as observed above, although the aforesaid provisions of the amending act may be valid, that would not affect the invalid constitution of the advisory boards for fixation of minimum wages for workmen employed in mica mines in the ..... or a member of the advisory board or a committee or sub-committee shall be called in question in any manner and no action or proceedings before any board, committee or sub-committee shall be called in question in any manner in any court of law on the ground merely ..... to agree with him that all the provisions of the amending act of 1960 are ultra vires of the powers of the state legislature, in as much as the amending act is of general nature amending the provisions of the minimum wages act, 1948 in respect of the scheduled industries enumerated in the ..... schedule annexed to the principal act, and has introduced an explanation in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 1985 (HC)

State of Rajasthan Vs. Prithvi Singh and 8 ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-14-1985

Reported in : 1986(1)WLN200

..... be instituted after coming into force of the rajasthan imposition of ceiling on agricultural holdings act, 1973 and such proceedings are valid.18. in pala singh v. state of rajasthan and ors. 1982 rrd page 55. hon'ble d.p. gupta, acting c.j. (as he then was) held that the notice issued on 1-12-1980 under the provisions of chapter iii-b ..... new ceiling law had come into force. the learned sdo rejected the above contention and held that by virtue of the provisions of section 6 of the rajasthan general clauses act, fresh proceedings under the old ceiling law could be instituted even after 1-1-1973. the above decision of the sdo was set aside by a single bench of the board ..... to tenancy of agricultural lands, and to provide for certain measures of land reforms. the law imposing ceiling on agricultural holdings was first introduced in rajasthan in the tenancy act by the amending act no. 4 of 1960. this tenancy amendment act no. 4 of 1960 was brought into force on 15th december, 1953. the law relating to ceiling was incorporated in the rajasthan tenancy ..... act, 1955 by introducing chapter iii-b and not by a separate law on ceiling of agricultural holdings. though, this amending act came into force on 15-12-1963, but its provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //