Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: hindu minority and guardianship act 1956 Court: allahabad Year: 1971 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.017 seconds)

Feb 25 1971 (HC)

Khyali Ram and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-25-1971

Reported in : 1971CriLJ1365

..... of his son. they too therefore, cannot be held to have committed an offence under section 363 of the indian penal code.5. no doubt, under section 6 of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, the custody of a minor who has not completed the age of five years shall ordinarily be with the mother but the father being the natural guardian of a ..... . applicant khyali ram is admittedly the father of the minor kalua. under section 6 of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, he is the natural guardian of the minor. it is true that the custody of a minor, who has not completed the age of five years shall ordinarily be with the mother as provided under the aforesaid act. as khyali ram is the natural guardian even if ..... he has removed the minor from the custody of the mother ..... hindu minor cannot be held to have committed an offence of kidnapping by removing his minor son from the custody of the mother.6. if the son has not yet completed the age of five .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 1971 (HC)

K. Kumar Vs. Onkar Nath

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-17-1971

Reported in : AIR1972All81

..... it is also not disputed that under hindu minority and guardianship act, father was the natural guardian of the minor plaintiff. section 8 of the hindu minority and guardianship act enumerates the power of natural guardian and section 11 of the hindu minority and guardianship act prohibits a de facto guardian from dealing with the minor's property. section 8 of the hindu minority and guardianship act is in these words:'8. (1 ..... ) the natural guardian of a hindu minor has power subject to ..... cases relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellant are all cases of transfers made by the de facto guardian in spite of the prohibition under hindu minority and guardianship act. narain singh's case, air 1968 pat 318, supra was a case where the transfer of property by a mother was being challenged on the ground ..... reiterated that smt. chameli devi was neither competent to give notice nor was she competent to file the suit as next friend of the minor. his contention is that under hindu minority and guardianship act, father alone being the natural guardian is competent to file the suit. in support of his contentions, he has placed his reliance on daneyi .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //