Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: hindu minority and guardianship act 1956 Court: mumbai nagpur Year: 2015 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.013 seconds)

Jul 31 2015 (HC)

Sreenivasagopalan Ananthakrishna Vs. Meenakshi Tripurari

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jul-31-2015

..... paramount consideration is the welfare and interest of the child and not the rights of the parents under a statute. even the statutes, namely, the guardians and wards act, 1890 and the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956 make it clear that the welfare of the child is a predominant consideration. in a matter of this nature, particularly, when the father and mother are fighting their ..... court under any law for the time being in force in respect of proceedings, inter alia as to proceedings in relation to guardianship of the person or custody of or access to any minor. under section 10(1) of the act of 1984, the family court is deemed to be a civil court and provisions of the code of civil procedure, 1908 are ..... required to be considered at the outset. under section 7 of the said act, power has been conferred on the court to make an order as to guardianship after being satisfied that the same would be for the welfare of the minor. the provisions of section 12 of the said act grant power to make an interlocutory order in the matter of production of ..... the minor and interim protection of person and property of the minor. section 12(1) of the said act reads thus: 12. power to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //