Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: hindu minority and guardianship act 1956 Year: 2015 Page 2 of about 38 results (0.042 seconds)

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Shri Shanti Nath Ji Sthan Deh Vs. the State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-15-2015

..... perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. the ..... so, to what extent?. answer:- no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), and thus a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of ..... ) in the manner that even if no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each ..... nature against the holder?. (v) whether any time limit can be fixed for reference u/s 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and u/s.232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity). if so, to what extent?. .2. a large number of writ petitions are pending in the rajasthan high court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Ram Narain and Ors Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-15-2015

..... perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. the ..... so, to what extent?. answer:- no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), and thus a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of ..... ) in the manner that even if no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each ..... nature against the holder?. (v) whether any time limit can be fixed for reference u/s 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and u/s.232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity). if so, to what extent?. .2. a large number of writ petitions are pending in the rajasthan high court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Ram Karan and Ors Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-15-2015

..... perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. the ..... so, to what extent?. answer:- no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), and thus a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of ..... ) in the manner that even if no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each ..... nature against the holder?. (v) whether any time limit can be fixed for reference u/s 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and u/s.232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity). if so, to what extent?. .2. a large number of writ petitions are pending in the rajasthan high court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Thandi and Anr Vs. Board of Revenue, Ajmer and Ors

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-15-2015

..... perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. the ..... so, to what extent?. answer:- no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), and thus a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of ..... ) in the manner that even if no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each ..... nature against the holder?. (v) whether any time limit can be fixed for reference u/s 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and u/s.232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity). if so, to what extent?. .2. a large number of writ petitions are pending in the rajasthan high court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Mahant Damodar Dass Chaila Prabhudas Vs. Jagdish Prasad Garg,rts and ...

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-15-2015

..... perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. the ..... so, to what extent?. answer:- no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), and thus a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of ..... ) in the manner that even if no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each ..... nature against the holder?. (v) whether any time limit can be fixed for reference u/s 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and u/s.232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity). if so, to what extent?. .2. a large number of writ petitions are pending in the rajasthan high court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Tara and Ors Vs. State and Anr

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-15-2015

..... perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. the ..... so, to what extent?. answer:- no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), and thus a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of ..... ) in the manner that even if no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each ..... nature against the holder?. (v) whether any time limit can be fixed for reference u/s 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and u/s.232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity). if so, to what extent?. .2. a large number of writ petitions are pending in the rajasthan high court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Kishan Lal and Ors Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-15-2015

..... perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. the ..... so, to what extent?. answer:- no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), and thus a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of ..... ) in the manner that even if no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each ..... nature against the holder?. (v) whether any time limit can be fixed for reference u/s 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and u/s.232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity). if so, to what extent?. .2. a large number of writ petitions are pending in the rajasthan high court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Mahant Damodar Dass and Ors Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-15-2015

..... perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. the ..... so, to what extent?. answer:- no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), and thus a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of ..... ) in the manner that even if no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each ..... nature against the holder?. (v) whether any time limit can be fixed for reference u/s 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and u/s.232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity). if so, to what extent?. .2. a large number of writ petitions are pending in the rajasthan high court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

State of Raj. and Anr Vs. Board of Revenue and Ors

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-15-2015

..... perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. the ..... so, to what extent?. answer:- no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), and thus a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of ..... ) in the manner that even if no time limit has been fixed for reference under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and under section 232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity), a reference can be made within a reasonable time, which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each ..... nature against the holder?. (v) whether any time limit can be fixed for reference u/s 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and u/s.232 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 in respect of the land held by a hindu idol (deity). if so, to what extent?. .2. a large number of writ petitions are pending in the rajasthan high court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 2015 (HC)

Maniyan Nadar Vs. Harikumar

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-06-2015

..... the natural guardian under the rsa nos.885/2006 and 626/2009 3 provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956 (in short, "the act 1956"). there cannot be any dispute that ext.a2 executed by the 3rd defendant, acting as guardian of the plaintiff, is void under section 11 of act 1956. therefore, defendants 1 and 2 in the suit were defenceless against the reliefs claimed in the ..... his interest at the time when ext.a2 was executed. section 8 of the act 1956 deals with the powers of a natural rsa nos.885/2006 and 626/2009 6 guardian of hindu minor. according to section 6 of the act 1956, in the case of a hindu minor, who is a boy or an unmarried girl, the father and after him, the mother shall be the ..... v. pachikaran veettil balakrishnan and another (2009 khc989 deal with the legal effect of challenges made by minors against alienations by mothers during their minority. in both these cases, the property involved in dispute belonged to hindu minors and, therefore, the provision in section 8 of the act 1956 was applicable. as mentioned earlier, on account of the binding pronouncements by apex court on this subject ..... personal or against his property. the defacto guardian may be liable personally and out of his properties for dealing with a hindu minor's property in contravention of section 11 of the act 1956 depending on the terms in the document concerned. by no stretch of reasoning, it can be held that the property shown as security in the failed deed of alienation will .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //