Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act 1997 section 19 administration of common pool fund Page 1 of about 156 results (0.155 seconds)

Nov 17 2015 (HC)

Maha Ganapati Shankara Devasthana, Sirsi and Others Vs. State of Karna ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... government is said to have constituted a high level committee, headed by justice m. rama jois (retired), to give suggestions for better administration of temples in the state and to make recommendations for amendment to the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as the khrice actfor brevity). the said committee having submitted its report, the state government is said to have enacted ..... rupees ten lakhs ?. section 19(1):administration of common pool fund. 1) the commissioner shall administer the common pool fund subject to the conditions herein stated and for the following purposes, namely. (a) the grant of aid to any other religious institution which is poor or in needy circumstances; (b) the grant of aid to any religious purposes connected with the hindu religion; (c) the propagation of the religious tenets of the institution; (d) the ..... , respectively, in a tabular form: section as under the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997 (karnataka act 33 of 2001)section as amended vide act no. 27/2011section as amended vide act no. 12/2012section 1(4) : it shall not apply (i) to a mutt or a temple attached, thereto; (ii) to any hindu religious institution or charitable endowment founded, organized run or managed by hindu religious denomination.substituted as:- section 1(4) it shall not apply .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2015 (HC)

Mahaganapati Shankara Devasthana Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... government is said to have constituted a high level committee, headed by justice m. rama jois (retired), to give suggestions for better administration of temples in the state and to make recommendations for amendment to the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as the khrice act , for brevity). the said committee having submitted its report, the state government is said to have enacted ..... performed. b) grants received from the state government. section 19(1): administration of common the pool commissioner shall administer the common pool fund subject to the conditions herein stated and the following purposes, namely.- (a) the grant of aid to any other institution which is poor or in needy religious received fund.- for1) for for the (a), clause in section 17 of the principal act,- word (i) commissioner the words rajya dharmika parishat ..... the section karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997 (karnataka act 33 of 2001) section 1(4) : it shall not apply (i) to a mutt or a temple attached, thereto; (ii) to any hindu religious institution charitable endowment founded, organized run or managed by hindu religious denomination. or 2 clause section (16): hindu does not include a buddhist, jain or sikh; 78 section as amended vide section as amended vide act no.27/2011 act no.12/2012 substituted as:- section 1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 2006 (HC)

Sri Sahasra Lingeshwara Temple, Rep. by Its Managing Trustee Sundaresh ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(1)KarLJ1

..... . though this judgment was rendered in 1980, the government has chosen to frame the present uniform act of 1997 for management and administration of hindu religious and charitable endowment in the state of karnataka after 17 long years. the object of the act is to make better provision for management of hindu religious institutions. the further object is to have a uniform law in the light of a longstanding public demand ..... made by the notified institutions at 5% of their gross annual income arrived at after deducting the donations made as contribution to the capital, amounts realised by sale of jewels and amounts received for specified services and grants received from the state government. the common pool fund is administered by the commissioner for the purpose mentioned in detail in section 19 of the act.the advisory committee ..... is available in chapter v. the advisory committee consists of the minister in-charge of endowments who shall be the chairman in addition to the commissioner and nine non official .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 2005 (HC)

B.M. Sukumar Shetty, Managing Trustee, Kollur Mookambika Temple and or ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR5241; 2005(5)KarLJ481

..... for the management and administration of hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments in the state of karnataka. in section 58 of the impugned act the authorities under the act, are restrained from interfering with religious customs, usages, ceremonies and practices of a notified institution. under the impugned act, provisions are made relating to age, qualification and service conditions of archakas, creation of common pool fund, budget, accounts and audit of notified institutions, constitution of the committee ..... writ petitions are hereby dismissed;(ii) i hold that the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997 and the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments rules, 2002, as valid and constitutional;(iii) liberty is reserved to the petitioners who are aggrieved by their inclusion in the notifications issued under section 23 of the act, to approach the authorities under the act, if they are so advised. if such written complaints are filed ..... will not spend for general purposes. section 19 lays down the specific purposes for which the common pool fund is to be applied. the notified institutions under the impugned act, who are having income are the contributors to the common pool fund. every notified institution is entitled to seek aid from the common pool fund for the purposes specified under section 19 of the impugned act. the purposes for which the common pool fund is to be applied is laudable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 02 2017 (HC)

Sri Ayyappa Seva Samajam represented by its Secretary Vs. The Commissi ...

Court : Chennai

..... caste, creed or community. on the above contention, the plaintiff would claim that the temple is not a religious institution as defined under sub-section 18 of section 6 of the hindu religious and charitable endowment act. therefore, the defendants namely, commissioner hr and ce, hindu religious charitable endowment administration department, cannot have any say in the matters of management of the temple in question. 8. in the ..... been relied upon by the authorities to sustain their conclusion that the temple in question is a religious institution ..... the meaning of sub section 18 of section 6 of the tamil nadu hindu religious and charitable endowment act 1959. the said conclusion is based, primarily, on the basis of the report of the inspector of hr and ce department dated 19.02.1989. certain statements recorded from a few persons by the inspector of the hr and ce department, have also ..... that question is to be decided on a consideration of the oral and documentary evidence in the case and not on the basis of any non-statutory presumption. 19. the division bench had also clarified that the popular perception among the courts to the effect that temples in south india except those in the transferred territory .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 2003 (HC)

Pushpagiri Mutt Vs. C. Indiramma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2003AP379; 2003(4)ALD267; 2003(4)ALT348

..... pointed out to the relevant rules under sections 74 and 107 of a.p. charitable and hindu religious institutions and endowments act 1966, act 17 of 1966, and also the present rules of 1987 framed in exercise of the powers conferred by section 80 read with section 153 of a.p. charitable and hindu religious institutions and endowments act, 1987, act no. 30 of 1987. the learned counsel ..... the plaintiff. ex.b-6 dated 7.11.1984 is another communication given by the commissioner, endowments department, hyderabad to the defendant. ex.b-7 is the copy communicated to the plaintiff by registered post dated 19.1.1984. ex.b-8 is the registered cover.14. the evidence of pw-1, ..... had sent a regular copy of the order refusing to confirm the sale and the same was received by the defendant on 16.1.1984. on 19.1.1984 the defendant sent by registered post acknowledgment due to the plaintiff, a copy of the order of the commissioner. the same was returned ..... stating that the plaintiff was not available in the village. on 19.1.1984, this defendant received registered notice sent by plaintiffs advocate. since a copy of the order of the commissioner was already sent by registered ..... post on 19.1.1984 itself, no reply was sent to the plaintiffs notice. the plaintiff is well aware of the facts that the sale held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2006 (HC)

K. Nissar Ahmed and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

..... usages are allowed.5. in the meanwhile a notification dated 30-4-2003 was issued including sri guru dattathreya bababudan swamy dargah in the list of hindu religious and charitable institutions governed by the provisions of the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997. one mohammed siddique and another firoz m. khan claiming to be the disciples of sri guru dattathreya bababudan swamy dargah challenged the above mentioned notification ..... the high court on 1-3-1985 directing the commissioner for religious institutions and charitable endowments to make an enquiry through the muzrai officer regarding the practice that was ..... the supreme court in its order dated 1-11-1991 in s.l.p. no. 17040 of 1991. the commissioner for religious institutions and charitable endowments had issued orders dated 24-8-1983, 10-1-1984 and 28-1-1985 regarding the administration of the dattathreya peetha. the said orders were subject-matter in writ petition no. 2294 of 1984 which was disposed of by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 1969 (SC)

Sri Digyadarsan Rajendra Ramdassjivaru Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC181; (1969)1SCC844; [1970]1SCR103

..... administration and governance of charitable and hindu religious institutions and endowments in the state of andhra pradesh. chapter i contains the definitions of various expressions used in the act including the word 'commissioner'. chapter ii provides for the appointment of commissioner, joint commissioners etc., and gives their powers and functions. chapter iii deals with administration and management of charitable and hindu religious institutions and endowments. chapter iv provides for registration of such institutions and endowments. section ..... previous incumbent died on march 18, 1962. on march 24, 1962 the commissioner took charge of the math and its properties under section 53 of the andhra pradesh (andhra areas) hindu religious & charitable endowments act, 1951, act no. 19 of 1951, hereinafter referred to as the 'repealed act'. the petitioner filed a suit on march 26, 1962 in the court of the subordinate judge, chittoor for a declaration that ..... leading an immoral life are being investigated. it cannot be said that section 47 would be hit by article 26(d) of the constitution as the powers under it will be exercised, inter alia, when mismanagement of property or maladministration of trust funds are involved.11. counsel for the petitioner has not made any serious attempt to argue that in the view .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 27 2000 (HC)

Kodachur Ganesh Rao Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(3)ALD704; 2000(3)ALT645

..... learned brother hon'ble justice g. raghuram, while considering the scope and effect of section 80(1)(c) of the andhra pradesh charitable and hindu religious institutions and endowments act, 1987 which requires that every sale of any immoveable property belonging to any charitable or religious institution or endowment shall be effected by tender-cum-public auction in the prescribed manner subject to the ..... .1224, dated 14-7-1997 is itself illegal and void being incontravention of rule 3 of the immovable properties (other than agricultural lands) lease rules, 1982, framed under the andhra pradesh charitable and hindu religious institutions and endowments act, which requires all the immovable properties other than the agricultural lands owned by the hindu religious institutions and endowments should be leased out only ..... [1986]1scr989 , wherein the apex court deprecated the sale of land belonging to a charitable endowment by private negotiations instead of by public auction. i have, therefore, no hesitation in holding that g.o. rt. no.1224, dated 14-7-1997 is illegal and void as it is plainly in contravention of rule 3 of the ..... ', regimental bazaar, secunderabad, which is governed by the provisions of the a.p. charitable and hindu religious institutions and endowments act, 1987 (herein referred to as 'the act') and the rules made thereunder. in g.o. rt.no.1224 revenue (endts.ii) department, dated14-7-1997, the government of andhra pradesh took a decision to accept the offer of p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 1973 (HC)

Paleru Venkateswarlu and ors. Vs. Potina Venkateswarulu and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1973AP264

..... hindu religious institution and that no suit in respect of such administration of management shall be instituted except as provided by that act'. the effect of section 73 was that a suit relating to the religious endowments governed by the act could be instituted by the religious endowment board or by some persons having interest and with the permission of the board.52. the 1926 act was repealed by the madras hindu religious and charitable endowments act, 19 of 1951. section ..... court and such a suit was maintainable. before the suit, however, was disposed of by the trial court the andhra pradesh charitable and hindu religious institutions and endowments act, 1966 ..... bench and that is how the matter has come before us.7. we have already seen that the suit was instituted in 1960 when the andhra pradesh hindu religious and charitable endowments act, 1951 was in force, whereunder it was a common ground that a suit under section 92 of the c.p.c. for framing a scheme and removal of trustees could be filed in a civil .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //