Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act 1997 section 23 notified institutions Page 1 of about 800 results (0.373 seconds)

Aug 31 2015 (HC)

Thangammal (since deceased) by his L.Rs Vs. The Secretary, Government ...

Court : Karnataka

..... with the objection statement, the notification dated 30-4-2003 has not been produced, the contention on behalf of the respondents that the temple has been notified under section 23 of the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997, cannot be doubted. if that be the position, to the extent that the premises wherein the petitioners are residing belongs to the temple cannot be ..... as well as the properties has been taken over by the government and the temple in any event has been subsequently notified on 30-4-2003 by issue of a notification as contemplated under section 23 of the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997. hence, it is contended that the orders are justified and the same do not call for interference. 6. having ..... taken note of the rival contentions, what cannot be lost sight is that prior to the instant proceedings under the act 1974 was initiated before the estate ..... orders impugned, the learned counsel for the petitioners would contend that the property in question does not answer the requirement of public premises as contained under section 2(e) of the act. it is contended that the property in question should have belonged to the public authority as on the date of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2005 (HC)

Dr. Madhav Shankar Pandit and ors. Vs. Dr. Ganapati Narayan Sabhahit a ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR657

..... that after the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997 hereinafter called 'khri & ce act' has come into force with effect from 1 /5/2003, whether the appeal filed against the order passed by the district court on the application of the second appellant would still survive or not. under section 78 of the act of the khri & ce act, the bpt act is repealed. nodoubt section 6 of the karnataka ..... the provisions of sections 23, 24 and 25 of the khri and ce act the bpt act was repealed. under section 23 of the act the temple in question is included as one of the religious institution under the act. under the provisions of the said act the commissioner shall be the chief controlling authority under section 24 of the act. the management and constitution of the committee of the notified religious institution shall be vested ..... factual position this court has not considered the nature of the right as claimed by the second appellant with reference to the provisions ofsections 23, 24 and 25 of the act 1997 as the temple in question is a notified religious institution.18. the above legal contention urged in this review petition is not pressed into service by the above respondents counsel at the time of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 2015 (HC)

Shreemad Jagadguru Shankaracharya Shree Shree Raghaveshwara Bharathi S ...

Court : Karnataka

..... unbroken line of the guruparampara of shree aadi shankaracharya. shri gokarna mahabaleshwara temple at gokarna was managed by the mutta. with the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997, having been enacted, the temple is said to have been notified under section 23 of the act in the year 2003. however, it is said that on the representation on behalf of the mutta, to the effect that it was ..... a temple that was inextricably a part of the mutta, the state government is said to have removed the temple from the list of notified ..... to be a man of the holy order and hence would not be expected to possess any personal wealth, the costs, if imposed, would come from the coffers of an institution which may indeed be involved with religious activity for the benefit of its followers and humanity in general. hence, we stop short of imposing costs. ..... liberty to the state government to direct an investigation afresh, if it so desires, through a competent police officer empowered with valid legal authority in strict compliance with section 5-a (1) of the act as indicated supra. no order as to costs." thus, we find that in bhajanlal's case, the supreme court has quashed the criminal proceedings on the ground .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 2015 (HC)

Shreemad Jagadguru Shankaracharya Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... unbroken line of the guruparampara of shree aadi shankaracharya. shri gokarna mahabaleshwara temple at gokarna was managed by the mutta. with the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997, having been enacted, the temple is said to have been notified under section 23 of the act in the year 2003. however, it is said that on the representation on behalf of the mutta, to the effect that it was ..... a temple that was inextricably a part of the mutta, the state government is said to have removed the temple from the list of 5 notified temples. the management of ..... to be a man of the holy order and hence would not be expected to possess any personal wealth, the costs, if imposed, would come from the coffers of an institution which may indeed be involved with religious activity for the benefit of its followers and humanity in general. hence, we stop short of imposing costs. nv* sd/- judge sd/- judge ..... liberty to the state government to direct an investigation afresh, if it so desires, through a competent police officer empowered with valid legal authority in strict compliance with section 5-a (1) of the act as indicated supra. no order as to costs. thus, we find that in bhajanlal s case, the supreme court has quashed the criminal proceedings on the ground .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 02 2013 (HC)

Vidya Manohara Teertha Swamigalu Peethadipathy and Another Vs. the Sta ...

Court : Karnataka

..... other than those notified under section 23: provided that it shall not apply to ..... section 2 of the second amendment act amending sub-section (4) of section 1, which reads as follows: "2. amendment of section 1: in the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997 (karnataka act 33 of 2001) (hereinafter referred to as the principal act), in section 1, - for sub-section (4), the following shall be substituted, namely:- "(4) it shall apply to, all religious institutions or charitable endowments notified under section 23, section 53 and chapter viii shall apply to all religious institutions or charitable endowments .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 2014 (HC)

B. Keerthivarma Shetty Vs. The State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... as jain religious institutions even by subsequent enactments by referring to sec. 1(2), its explanation, sec.2 and sec.5(3) of the madras hindu religious and charitable endowments act, 1951 ('act, 1951' for short). the contents therein is similar to the above extracted portion of act ii of 1927 to exclude the jain religious .institutions and the power of notifying is given to the government. 17. further, the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997 ('act, 1997' for ..... short) is referred by pointing to sec.78 ..... only hindu religious institutions and endowments. further, in sec.78 of act, 1997, the sub- sec. (2) thereto wherein the repeal of the enactments is listed, does not include act, 1863. on the other hand, act, 1863 is enlisted in sub-sec.(1) thereto indicating that it will not be applicable to the charitable endowments and hindu religious institutions governed under that act. the institutions governed under that act are the institutions notified under sec.23 which does not include jain religious institutions. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 2014 (HC)

B Keerthivarma Shetty Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... by subsequent enactments by referring to sec.1(2), its explanation, sec.2 and sec.5(3) of the madras hindu religious and charitable endowments act,1951 ( act, 1951 for short). the contents therein is similar to the above extracted portion of act ii of 1927 to exclude the jain religious institutions and the power of notifying is given to the government.17. further, the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997 ( act, 1997 for short) is referred by pointing ..... to sec.78 therein which provides for the ..... only hindu religious institutions and 22 endowments. further, in sec.78 of act, 1997, the sub- sec.(2) thereto wherein the repeal of the enactments is listed, does not include act,1863. on the other hand, act, 1863 is enlisted in sub-sec.(1) thereto indicating that it will not be applicable to the charitable endowments and hindu religious institutions governed under that act. the institutions governed under that act are the institutions notified under sec.23 which does not include jain religious institutions.18 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2015 (HC)

Mahaganapati Shankara Devasthana Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... 1(4): it shall apply to, all religious institutions or charitable endowments notified under section 23. section 53 and chapter viii shall apply to all institutions or religious charitable endowments other than those notified under section 23: provided that ..... and wp646482011 are identical in nature and prayers made are also identical. the petitioners in all the writ petitions are public religious charitable trusts registered under the erstwhile bombay trusts act, 1950, which was repealed by the hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act 1997 (hereafter referred to as act no.33 of 2001 , ). the prayers in the three writ petitions are identical. insofar as the writ petition is ..... section karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997 (karnataka act 33 of 2001) section 1(4) : it shall not apply (i) to a mutt or a temple attached, thereto; (ii) to any hindu religious institution charitable endowment founded, organized run or managed by hindu religious denomination. or 2 clause section (16): hindu does not include a buddhist, jain or sikh; 78 section as amended vide section as amended vide act no.27/2011 act no.12/2012 substituted as:- section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 2005 (HC)

B.M. Sukumar Shetty, Managing Trustee, Kollur Mookambika Temple and or ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR5241; 2005(5)KarLJ481

..... the writ petitions are hereby dismissed;(ii) i hold that the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997 and the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments rules, 2002, as valid and constitutional;(iii) liberty is reserved to the petitioners who are aggrieved by their inclusion in the notifications issued under section 23 of the act, to approach the authorities under the act, if they are so advised. if such written complaints are filed ..... brought in with an object to make better provisions for the management and administration of hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments in the state of karnataka. in section 58 of the impugned act the authorities under the act, are restrained from interfering with religious customs, usages, ceremonies and practices of a notified institution. under the impugned act, provisions are made relating to age, qualification and service conditions of archakas, creation of common ..... provisions for the management and administration of the hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments in the state of karnataka a comprehensive act is enacted by the karnataka state legislature. there are xi chapters and 79 sections in the act. section 1 states that the act is extended to the entire state of karnataka and to the hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments notified by the state government. the act shall not apply to mutt or a temple .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2015 (HC)

Maha Ganapati Shankara Devasthana, Sirsi and Others Vs. State of Karna ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... be prescribed; b) to approve proposals for adoption of a hindu religious institution or charitable endowment, whose annual income is not more than five thousand rupees, by a larger hindu religious institution, charitable endowment or trust; and c) to perform such other functions as the state government may from time to time specify. section 22 of the principal act shall be omittedsection 23 notified institutions: the state government shall as soon as may be after ..... 64648/2011 are identical in nature and prayers made are also identical. the petitioners in all the writ petitions are public religious charitable trusts registered under the erstwhile bombay trusts act, 1950, which was repeated by the hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act 1997 (hereafter referred to as act no. 33 of 2001',). the prayers in the three writ petitions are identical. insofar as the writ petition is wp 65539 ..... , respectively, in a tabular form: section as under the karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments act, 1997 (karnataka act 33 of 2001)section as amended vide act no. 27/2011section as amended vide act no. 12/2012section 1(4) : it shall not apply (i) to a mutt or a temple attached, thereto; (ii) to any hindu religious institution or charitable endowment founded, organized run or managed by hindu religious denomination.substituted as:- section 1(4) it shall not apply .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //