Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: income tax act 1961 section 44ae Page 1 of about 142,546 results (0.766 seconds)

Sep 18 1995 (HC)

N.K. Mohnot Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1995]216ITR844(Mad); (1996)IILLJ189Mad

..... liable to be disqualified under section 288(5)(b) of the income-tax act, 1961, to represent an assessee under section 288(1) of the income-tax act. article ii. - that the said sri narendra kumar mohnot having his office in the name and style of 'mohnot and co.' at no. 38, college road, nungambakkam, madras-6, has issued a forged audit certificate under section 44ae, by using the name of ..... one sri. p. ramanujam, chartered accountant at no. 162, thambu chetty street, madras-1. thus, sri narendra kumar mohnot has committed grave misconduct for which he is liable to be disqualified under section 288(5)(b) of the income-tax act, 1961, to represent an assessee under section 288(1) of the income-tax act. article iii. - that the ..... certificates. thus, sri narendra kumar mohnot has committed grave misconduct for which he is liable to be disqualified under section 288(5)(b) of the income-tax act, 1961, to represent an assessee under section 288(1) of the income-tax act. ' 3. in the statement of imputation of misconduct sent along with the articles of charge shown in annexure-ii, the relevant facts are set out. as regards .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 2007 (HC)

Haji N. Abdulla Vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(Bom)471; 2009(235)ELT609(Bom); [2008]299ITR119(Bom); 2008(2)MhLj614

..... record and consequently, is liable to be set aside.5. on behalf of the respondent, it is firstly submitted that the petitioner's income has been assessed under section 44ae of the it act, and therefore, there is no scope for the petitioner to say that there are complexities. the petition does not disclose as to ..... what are the complexities of the accounts. the appeal preferred for the block assessment year of 27th feb., 2003 is still pending. it is also set out that the cit ..... at the time of filing the appeal, where the returns has been filed by the assessee, the assessee had paid the tax due on income returned by him, or when no return has been filed by the assessee, the assessee has paid an amount equal to the amount of advance ..... without setting out any particulars. the learned bench placed reliance on the judgment of the supreme court in calcutta discount co. ltd. v. ito : [1961]41itr191(sc) the supreme court in that case was examining the issue of full and true disclosure. the court held that once all the primary facts are ..... which involves true and full disclosure being made so as to warrant consideration. the settlement commission relied on the judgment of this court in the case of cit v. itsc and ors. : [2000]246itr63(bom) where this court approvingly quoted the following observations :there is no right in the assessee to invoke .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2006 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bhagyalakshmi and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007ACJ1676

..... under sections 142(1) and 143(2) and served on the assessee's gpa holder m.l. ravi, who in response to ..... lorries, nor had he declared his income at rs. 30,00,000 per month. he also stated that he has no personal knowledge about the ..... . 3 and the son of the deceased. said assessment order would further disclose that a return of income was filed on 29.3.1996 for the assessment year 1993-94 by late m.n. lingappa, in response to the notice issued under section 148 (sic of income tax act, 1961) and that since it was a belated return, the same was lodged and notices were issued ..... of the deceased, it is only ravi, claimant no. 3, who was an income tax assessee and not the deceased. he has in fact produced the file pertaining to ravi, claimant no. 3. according to him, the deceased had declared only 8 lorries under section 44-ae (sic of income tax act, 1961). he has stated that the deceased had never declared that he is having 100 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1997 (HC)

Ranjan Constructions Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes

Court : Orissa

Reported in : [1998]232ITR76(Orissa); 1997(II)OLR338

..... all) ), dated february 23, 1996, issued by the central board of direct taxes (in short 'cbdt'), relating to admissibility of deduction on account of salary and interest to the partners of firms opting for estimation of income under sections 44ad and 44ae of the income-tax act, 1961 (in short the 'act'). same was issued on the ground that doubt has been raised relating to deduction ..... as regards salary and interest to the partners of a firm while estimating income on the basis of the aforesaid two provisions. the view ..... restriction on the deduction allowable on account of salary and interest to the partners and is not an enabling section for claiming deduction. the admissible deductions are specifically mentioned under sections 30 to 38 of the income-tax act. hence, sections 44ad(2) and 44ae(3) only state this obvious position by way of clarification. however, in view of the non-obstante ..... clause in subsection (1) of sections 44ad and 44ae, there is no ambiguity about the intention of the legislature in this matter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 2014 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax , Kolxx Vs. Dipak Kumar Singha Roy

Court : Kolkata

..... on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was justified in law in giving relief to the assessee by accepting the computation of profit under section 44ae of the income tax act, 1961 transportation by deleting charges without rs.2,08,039\8/considering on account the facts of and circumstances of the instant case and the materials available on record ?. let ..... side itat no.75 of 2014 g.a.no.1982 of 2014 commissioner of income tax , kol-xx versus dipak kumar singha roy before: the hon'ble justice soumitra pal the hon'ble justice debangsu basak date : 15th september, 2014. mr.r.n.bandopadhyay, advocate with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 07 2005 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ashoka Dairy

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2006)200CTR(P& H)211; [2005]279ITR32(P& H)

..... in the said provision if he proves that there was reasonable cause for the said failure.'12. in cit v. capital electronics (gariahat) : [2003]261itr4(cal) , a division bench of the calcutta high court interpreted section 271b of the act and held (headnote):'section 271b of the income-tax act, 1961, inserted with effect from april 1, 1985, began with the phrase 'if any person fails without ..... of this court:'whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the income-tax appellate tribunal was right in law in confirming the order of the learned commissioner of income-tax (appeals), karnal, who deleted the penalty of rs. 1 lakh imposed under section 271b of the income-tax act, 1961 by the assessing officer?' 2. the assessee is engaged in the sale of milk. ..... held (headnote):'prior to april 1, 1989, the failure to furnish the return of income within the time specified under sub-section (1) of section 139 of the income-tax act, 1961, attracted penalty under section 271(1)(a). however, with effect from april 1, 1989, the said provision was omitted and section 234a was incorporated which provided for a stringent penal interest for the period of such ..... , if the profits and gains from the business are deemed to be the profits and gains of such person under section 44ad or section 44ae or section 44af (or section 44bb or section 44bbb), as the case may be, and he has claimed his income to be lower than the profits or gains so deemed to be the profits and gains of his business, as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2007 (HC)

Ghai Construction Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(5)MhLj862; [2009]184TAXMAN52(Bom)

..... account certified by chartered account (accountant) for the last three financial years in case of companies. in other cases tax audit report along with balance sheet and profit and loss account, duly certified by chartered accountant in terms of provision of section 44ab, income tax act, 1961.(emphasis supplied.)2.4.2. the net worth of the offerer shall be as stated at sr. no. 6 ..... of respondent nos. 2 to 4). it is also admitted that the balance sheet in respect of the sole proprietary business of the petitioner was audited in accordance with section 44ab of the income tax act. it was contended, however, that, the petitioner's personal balance sheet was not audited and was, therefore, not acceptable as per clause 2.3.5. the admission and ..... then be utilized by them for more important investigational aspects of a case. audit would help in the proper presentation of accounts before the assessing officers. ultimately, section 44ab was introduced in the income tax act only with effect from 1-4-1985 providing for compulsory audit in the no corporate sector.22. while stating in detail the need for mandatory audit, the committee ..... the business shall, if the profits and gains from the business are deemed to be the profits and gains of such person under section 44ad or section 44ae or section 44af, as the case may be, and he has claimed his income to be lower than the profits or gains so, deemed to be the profits and gains of his business, as the case may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2006 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Thirumalai Fertiliser and Co.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2007]288ITR517(Mad); (2006)4MLJ1179

..... p.p.s. janarthana raja, j.1. the present appeal is filed under section 260a of the income tax act, 1961 by the revenue against the order passed in i.t.a. no. 864/mds/2000 by the income tax appellate tribunal, madras, 'a' bench. on 21.10.2003, this court admitted the appeal and formulated the following question of law. 1. whether ..... section 143(2) of the income tax act (hereinafter referred to as the 'act'), was served directing the assessee to furnish details. after the details were furnished by the assessee, the income tax officer completed the assessment under section 143(3) of the act, accepting the total loss return by the assessee. further, he made addition by estimating the business income from 2 lorries under section 44ae ..... at rs. 48,000/- and declared the assessment as 'n.a.'. later, the income tax officer was of the view that there ..... also to purchase peace with the department. the assessing officer trying to make assessment under section 44ae by invoking the rectification proceeding under section 154 of the act, is not justified. it amounts to reassessing the income, which is not permissible under section 154 of the act. section 154 is meant for carrying out rectification of mistake which is apparent on the face of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 1996 (HC)

Sethi Transport and ors. Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : [1997]226ITR274(Orissa)

..... to the petitioners under section 194c of the act. since the facts and points of law involved in all the cases are similar, they were ..... 299), dated march 8, 1994, issued by the central board of direct taxes (for short, 'the board'), ministry of finance, government of india, opposite party no. 1, is ultra vires articles 14 and 265 of the constitution of india and sections 44ae, 119 and 194c of the income-tax act, 1961 (for short 'the act'), and for a direction not to make any deduction from the amount due ..... in associated cement co.'s case : [1993]201itr435(sc) and held that the supreme court has in no way extended or amplified the scope of section 194c of the income-tax act, 1961- it merely held that the said section is not confined to works contracts but also applies to labour contracts. the supreme court in that case was required to consider the question of applicability ..... of section 194c to labour contracts because the contention of the assessee was that the said section was applicable only to works contracts. it was this contention that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 2015 (HC)

Jasvinder Singh Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Kolkata

..... to the assessment year 2000-2001 was admitted on the following substantial question of law : whether the petitioner is entitled to get the benefit under the provisions of section 44ae(1) and 44ae(2) of the income tax act, 1961 ?. heard mr.prithu dhudhoria, learned advocate for the appellant and mr.m.p.agarwal, learned advocate for the respondent/revenue. it appears that the assessment was ..... completed under section 143(3) of the income tax act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said act ).during assessment it was found that the appellant derived higher income of rs.12,35,529/- from ..... that the assessee in his books of account had disclosed a sum of rs.6,41,211 as his income from the vehicle on hire and had capitalized the same and as there is no provision under the act, particularly under section 44ae, to tax at a lower amount or to restrict the taxability of rs.1,08,000/- and to exempt the ..... simultaneously claiming higher profit from the business of playing heavy vehicles and paying taxes on lower amount of tax on estimated income u/s.44ae of the i.t.act. the tribunal, after considering the submissions made by the learned advocates for the parties and interpreting section 44ae, allowed the appeal of the revenue by holding, inter alia, as under : we have considered the rival .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //