Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: income tax act Sorted by: recent Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.045 seconds)

Mar 17 1999 (TRI)

All India Esi Corporation Vs. Director General, Esi

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-17-1999

..... like cbi. central administrative tribunal, border security ordnance factory board employees, crime-assistants in cbi and assistants in the subordinate offices of directorate general of income tax (inv): offices of the cbtd, ministry of finance.12. before we part with the case, we would also like to mention that after amendment ..... in section 17(2)(b) of the esi act in 1989, the pay, allowances and other service conditions of the esi employees are required to be determined in accordance with the rules and orders ..... to deny applicants claim on the basis of classification cannot be supported in law.7. reliance was placed on section 17(2)(b) of the esi act, which according to respondents, is a bar to grant parity in the pay scale with the central government. the argument is fallacious, since there ..... claims/demands of the assistants in esic in regard to pay scale of rs. 1640-2900 being admissible to them but have rejected the same acting on the advice of the ministry of finance, despite a favourable recommendation for pay parity given by staff college, hyderabad. it is, therefore, ..... d. categories of esic have been enjoying parity with the employees working in central government in corresponding pay scale in accordance with the mandatory provisions of esi act namely 17(2)(a). the age old parity has since been disturbed by the three orders now under challenge. (c) in support of their contentions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1999 (TRI)

Praveen Kumar Bansal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-20-1999

..... if it is to be said that the instructions contained in the om dated 14.5.87 are discretionary and not mandatory, such discretion is coupled with the duty to act in a manner which will promote the object for which the power is conferred and also satisfy the mandatory requirement of the statute. it was not therefore open to the ..... 136 decided on 16.11.99. the apex court in this case found that the appellant had all the requisite qualifications and had applied for the post of member, sales tax appellate tribunal (stat for short) under the govt. of nct of delhi. the post advertised in november, 1996 was for one only. the selection committee recommended a panel of two ..... 1. the applicant, a member (accounts) of income tax appellate tribunal (itat for short), is aggrieved by a-1 order dated 30.9.1998 by which respondent no. 1 has terminated his services exclusively on account of having "been .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //