Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: income tax act Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai goa Year: 2012 Page 2 of about 14 results (0.057 seconds)

Jun 25 2012 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. the Bardez Bazar Consumer Co-op. So ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Jun-25-2012

..... 2000-2001. for the assessment year 1997-1998, the assessee had filed return of income on 15/10/1997 which was processed under section 143(1) of the income tax act, 1961( i.t. act, for short) and proposal under section 151(2) of i.t. act 1961 was sent by the assessing officer to the office of j.c.i.t ..... ., range- 2, panaji for approval to issue notice under section 148 of the i.t. act. accordingly, notice under the said ..... i.t.(a), on the ground that the principle of mutuality does apply and the income earned from members is liable to be exempted from tax. the tax appeal no. 13 of 2007 has been filed under section 260-a of the i.t. act against the said order dated 06/09/2006 passed by the i.t.a.t. ..... no. 92/pnj/2007, thereby holding that the principle of mutuality applies and that the income earned from members is liable to be exempted from tax. 2. the respondent is the assessee, which is a co-operative society registered under the co-operative societies act, engaged in trading in consumer goods to its members as well as non-members. ..... no. 18 of 2007 has been filed under section 260-a of the i.t. act. 5. the relevant facts in tax appeal no. 36 of 208 are as follows: for the assessment year 2004-2005, the assessee had filed return of income on 05/10/2004 which return was processed under section 143(1) of i.t .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 13 2012 (HC)

Shri Jitendra Raghuraj Deshprabhu and Others Vs. Shri Vasudeo Rajendra ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Jun-13-2012

..... union of india and another; (2004)3 bcr 450. (iv) unreported judgment in the case of m/s.shivsagar veg. restaurant vs. assistant commissioner of income tax dated 14/11/2008 delivered by the division bench of this court. 11. per contra, mr. lotlikar fairly conceded that the judgment delivered by the tribunal is ..... the absence of any prejudice having been pointed out, the petitioners are not entitled to any relief sought in the present petition. the tribunal having acted in breach of principles of natural justice, the judgment and order which affects the rights of the petitioners, is liable to be quashed and set ..... it was observed that the ballot boxes would be opened at the appropriate time at different stages as required by the tribunal. thus, the tribunal acted clearly in breach of the principles of natural justice by opening the ballot boxes, in the absence of the parties. thus, the procedure followed by ..... the judgment delivered by the learned single judge in the case of pradeep sangodker (supra) is clearly binding on the tribunal and the tribunal has acted in clear breach of the directions given by the learned single judge of this court. mrs. agni further submitted that this is a case of willful ..... and nullities of the election, appeal may be filed to the administrative, fiscal and audit tribunal within the time limit of 10 days from the act of election 7. it is further the case of the petitioners that article 30 of the devasthan regulations does not lay down any procedure nor any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 12 2012 (HC)

M/S. Tulip Diagnostics Pvt. Ltd. Represented by Its Managing Director, ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Jun-12-2012

..... application under order 41 rule 27 of the civil procedure code for leave to produce the auditor's report, bank pay slip and copy of the income tax returns of the concerned director. the learned counsel has taken me through the income tax returns of aw1 shri v.k. naik and pointed out that the salary shown to have been received by the said director is .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 08 2012 (HC)

Miss Kumud Pagi Vs. Gurudas Shet Gaonkar and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : May-08-2012

..... sometime in may of the year 2006. according to the learned counsel, therefore, since the accident had occurred in the year 2003, the actual loss of income should have been calculated for three years. it is also his submission that on account of permanent disability sustained by her, there is loss of amenities ..... the claimant was earning rs. 200/- to rs.250/- per day. the tribunal has held that it has no other option than to consider the notional income of the claimant as rs.1250/- per month. it can be understood that the claimant has been held to be simply a housewife and, therefore, the ..... earning about rs. 200/- to rs. 250/- per day and she has deposed to this effect. according to him, the tribunal has wrongly held that notional income of the claimant should be considered as rs.1250/- per month. he has relied upon nagarajappav. divisional manager, oriental insurance co. ltd.(air 2011 s.c. ..... amount was adjusted from the final compensation. the claimant has thus been awarded additional compensation of rs.92,800/- under section 166 of the m.v. act along with simple interest thereon at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition i.e. from 19.11.2003 ..... whereby the said claim petition has been partly allowed. 2. the appellant had filed the said claim petition under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (m.v. act, for short) thereby claiming total compensation of rs.12.00,000/- on account of injuries sustained by her in a motor vehicular accident, which injuries .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //