Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian partnership act 1932 preamble 1 the indian partnership act 1932 Page 1 of about 4,671 results (0.284 seconds)

Apr 22 1996 (HC)

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hassan Chand and Sons

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [1997]224ITR244(Raj)

..... subsequent thereto, be made - (a) where the firm is not registered under the indian partnership act, 1932 (ix of 1932), or where the deed of partnership is not registered under the indian registration act, 1908 (xvi of 1908), and the application for registration is being made for the first time under the act, (i) within a period of six months of the constitution of the firm or before the ..... in that previous year, (ii) before the end of the previous year in any other caseaa (b) where the firm is registered under the indian partnership act, 1932 (ix of 1932), or where the deed of partnership is registered under the indian registration act, 1908 (xvi of 1908), before the end of the previous year of the firm, and (c) where the application is for renewal of ..... he held the view that the guardian of the heirs of the deceased partner constituted the third partner in the firm and, therefore, the provisions of section 37 of the indian partnership act, 1932, did not apply to the case.10. having lost its case before the income-tax officer and the appellate assistant commissioner for both the years, the assessee-firm approached ..... tribunal, this position continued right up to the assessment year 1959-60. it was on january 1, 1959, that the instrument of partnership which is in question, was executed between shri abdul razaq and hamid hussain, i.e., the remaining two partners. in the preamble of this partnership deed, it was mentioned that it had been decided and agreed upon between the two continuing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 1996 (HC)

Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Hassan Chand and Sons.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1996)133CTR(Raj)284

..... assessment subsequent thereto, be made) -(a) where the firm is not registered under the indian partnership act, 1932 (ix of 1932) or where the deed of partnership is not registered under the indian registration act, 1908 (xvi of 1908) and the application for registration is being made for the first time under the act,(i) within a period of six months of the constitution of the firm or before the ..... in that previous year,(ii) before the end of the previous year in any other case;(b) where the firm is registered under the indian partnership act, 1932 (ix of 1932) or where the deed of partnership is registered under the indian registration act, 1908 (xvi of 1908) before the end of the previous year of the firm, and(c) where the application is for renewal of registration ..... 31st dec., 1958 no profits were attributable to the use of his share in the properties of the firm so as to attract the provisions of s. 37 of the indian partnership act, 1932 to the facts of the present case. the ito, therefore, held that neither the application was signed by all the partners nor were the profits and losses distributed amongst the ..... , this position continued right upto asst. yr. 1959-60. it was on 1st jan., 1959 that the instrument of partnership which is in question, was executed between shri abdul razaq and hamid hussain, i.e., the remaining two partners. in the preamble of this partnership deed it was mentioned that it had been decided and agreed upon between the two continuing living partners to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 2013 (HC)

Yousuf Andcompany, Rep. by Its Partner Vs. the Government Ofandhra Pra ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... for carrying on any activity whatsoever on the demised plot, then notwithstanding anything in the indian partnership act, 1932, it shall also be deemed to be a violation of the conditions of the lease. (2) lessees of plots whose leases shall not be cancelled under clause (b) of sub-section (1) shall be entitled to a grant of fresh lease with effect from the appointed ..... 1992 was amended. it came into force from 17.02.2000 when it was published in the gazette.41. section 2 of act 1 of 2000 amended the preamble to act 15 of 1992 and substituted for the last paragraph of its preamble the following : "2. ... ... ... and whereas it is necessary to give effect to the directive principles of state policy as contained in clauses ..... ground of violation of art.14 of constitution of india and even if it did, such a challenge is impermissible in view of art.31-c as preamble to act 15 of 1992 (as amended by act 1 of 2000) states that it is intended to give effect to the directive principles of state policy as contained in clauses (b) and (c) of art ..... of leases) (amendment) act 2000 (for short, 'act 1 of 2000') amending act 15 of 1992. it amended the preamble to the 1992 act and also directed substitution of sections 3 and 4 of 1992 act as under : "3. for sections 3 and 4 of the principal act, the following shall be substituted, namely: - "termination of leases:3. (1)(a) notwithstanding anything contained in the indian contract act, 1872, the transfer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2005 (HC)

Ranjana Anil Ringay and ors. Vs. Government of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR400; 2006(1)BomCR909

..... on any account or gratuity. section 3(2) is relevant. we may reproduce the same.3(2). every person excluding firms whether registered under the indian partnership act, 1932, or not and hindu undivided family engaged actively or otherwise in any profession, trade callings or employment and falling under one of the other of ..... , callings and employment. presently the amount cannot be more than rs. 2,500/- per annum. pursuant to this power, the act has been enacted in 1975 and its preamble states that it is being enacted for the benefit of the state for raising additional resources needed for implementing the employment guarantee scheme ..... accepted is clearly without the authority of law. the reminder of the amount has been deducted by respondent no. 4 and received by respondent no. 1 without the authority of law.10. on behalf of the respondent no. 4 their learned counsel points out that the entire amount deducted has been ..... otherwise in any profession, trade callings or employment and falling under one or the other of the classes mentioned in the second column of schedule 1 shall be liable to pay to the state government the tax at the rate mentioned in the third column of the schedule. a careful reading, ..... the classes mentioned in the second column of schedule 1 shall be liable to pay to the state government the tax at the rate mentioned against the class of such persons in the third column .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2012 (HC)

M/S. Radiant Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Insurance Regulatory and Developme ...

Court : Delhi

..... received. 16. though section 2(8) of insurance act while defining an "insurance company", defines the same as a company, association or partnership which may be wound up under the companies act, 1956 or to which the indian partnership act, 1932 applies, implying thereby reference to indian companies / firms only and section 2(7a) while defining "indian insurance company" includes within its ambit insurance companies in ..... it is to be thus seen on an analysis of the provisions of the insurance act and the irda act, whether any intention of the legislature to apply insurance laws extra territorially can be found. 14. the preamble to the insurance act describes the same as an act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the business of insurance as distinct from ..... respondents also do not controvert that without the foreign insurance companies being registered, the appellant cannot be registered as their agent. 10. the counsel for the respondent no.1 irda has with reference to the various clauses of the agreements entered into by the appellant with the foreign insurance companies contended that the same are in fact of appointment ..... the business of insurance in india, though the applicability of the act under section 1 (2) is pan india. section 2c and section 3 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 2000 (TRI)

Smt. Aruna A. Brat Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in : (2002)75TTJ(Pune.)675

..... this regard on the basis o mere agreement to purchase the property in joint names. reference can b made to the provisions of section 6 of indian partnership act, 1932 which are set out as under : in determining whether a group of persons is or is not a firm, or whether a person is ..... executed admitting two sons of shri c.v. shah as partners. thereafter, the assessee and her daughter retired from the said partnership by executing a deed of retirement dated 25-1-1994 (appearing on page 158 of the paper book). on retirement, each of them received a sum of rs. 62.50 ..... 8-1988." the perusal of the above clause, nowhere shows that assessee became the partner with shri shah. it is also interesting to note that the preamble of the agreement as well as clause 2 described the assessee as well as her children viz., miss gauree v. bhat, miss supriya a. bhat ..... order, it has been held that arrangement between the parties, by execution of the agreement dated 20-11-1993, partnership deeds dated 15-12-1999 and 19-1-1994, and retirement deed, dated 25-1-1994 was within legal framework and, therefore, the commissioner (appeals) was not justified in holding that such arrangement ..... (appeals) refused to look into the evidence on the ground that it was fresh evidence and without giving any further opportunity enhanced the income by rs. 1,00,000.shri inamdar, the learned counsel for the assessee, submitted that surprisingly when the commissioner (appeals) issued notice of enhancement, the assessee produced the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 1961 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay South Vs. Md. Khalid Faquih and Co.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1963]47ITR383(Bom)

..... would be shared only by the adult partners. there being these two factors and there being no express term in any of the deeds contravening the provisions of section 30 of the partnership act, ..... minor is to share in the profits of the firm. in other words, the minor has been admitted to the benefits of the partnership. it is true that in the preamble the minor has been mentioned as a partner of the firm. but mere description in the deed would not make the minor a ..... of partnership is not conclusive in the matter of construction of the deed. the preamble itself has made its clear that some of the partners are minors. the deed further provides that the losses ..... firm. it is his contention that there is not clause in both these deeds which has expressly contravened section 30 of the partnership act in any of the aforesaid manner. the preamble to these deeds no doubts describes the minors as partner in the firm. but a description of a party in the instrument ..... (1) of section 66 of the indian income-tax act and the question referred to us is in the following terms : 'whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the assessee firm was rightly registration under section 26a of the act of the assessment years 1955-56 and 1956-57 ?' 2. the assessee is partnership firm .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1968 (HC)

National Trading Company Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal I ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1969]71ITR513(Cal)

..... . - this reference, under section 66(1) of the indian income-tax act, 1922, has been made in the circumstances hereinafter related.the year of assessment, with which we are concerned, is 1958-59, the corresponding accounting year being the calendar year ending with december 31, 1957.the assessee is a firm of 11 partners, constituted by a deed of partnership, dated may 14, 1956 ..... in equal shares by the major partners of the 1st and 3rd part. but apart from this privilege the minors have been treated as fullfledged partners in the deed. the preamble to the deed mentions the names of all the eleven parties and then recites that the said eleven parties hereto agree between themselves to become partners and to carry on ..... that the parties, including the minors, agreed between themselves to become partners and to carry on the business of partnership. this ground, in our opinion, should not be over-emphasised, because in the deed of partnership in shah jethaji phulchand case the preamble recited :'3. whereas the above 5 parties have agreed to do business of cotton and kapas, purchases and sales and ..... areas under the name and style jethaji phulchand.'the 'five' mentioned in the preamble included the minors. in spite of this preamble the supreme court was pleased to hold that the partnership deserved registration.the next ground relied on by the tribunal was that by clause 4 of the deed of partnership all the partners were required to contribute capital. this ground, in our .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 2004 (HC)

Cit Vs. Badri Nath Ganga Ram

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2005)194CTR(All)347

..... for the loss to the extent to his share according to section 30 of the indian partnership act.'in the preamble to the partnership deed it is mentioned that lakhan lal, the minor son of sri badri prasad, shall continue to get the benefits of partnership according to section 30 of the indian partnership act. learned counsel for the department has placed reliance upon the following cases in support ..... the present case the minor has also been made liable to share the losses to the extent of his share, according to section 30 of the indian partnership act, the firm is not entitled for grant of registration.(1) cit v. oriental t. maritime : [1997]227itr244(ap) (2) addl. cit v. uttam kumar pramod kumar : [1978]115itr796(all) ;(3) cit v. dwarkadas khetan and ..... sub-section in our opinion, has nothing to do with sub-section (1) of section 30 of the indian partnership act, which provides that a minor can be admitted to the benefits of partnership. section 2(a) of the partnership act defines an 'act of a firm' means any act or omission by all the partners, or by any partner or agent of the firm, which gives rise to ..... will not include sharing of losses by a partner or minor.the appellate commissioner while allowing the appeal lost sight of the fact that sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 30 of the indian partnership act operates in different fields.in view of the above discussions, we are of the opinion that the order of the tribunal granting registration to the assessee-firm .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 1987 (TRI)

income-tax Officer Vs. N.P. Radhakrishna

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in : (1987)21ITD334(Hyd.)

..... by it....in our opinion, there is no change in the constitution of the firm and the firm is entitled to renewal of registration.9. section 30(5) of the indian partnership act, 1932, reads as follows : at any time within six months of his attaining majority, or of his obtaining knowledge that he had been admitted to the benefits of ..... .the scope of this section is explained in the case of bhogilal laherchand v. cit air 1956 bom. 41.1. according to this decision, under section 30 of the indian partnership act, if a minor on attaining majority elects to continue as a partner, the partnership does not come to an -end. it continues and the minor, having become a partner, is entitled to his ..... to which a minor is admitted consists of three partners in the eye of the i.t. act. when a minor attains majority and opts to remain in, he becomes a full-fledged partner under the indian partnership act, but since he was already a partner within the meaning of i.t. act, there is no change in the number of partners or in their identity. the ..... with the position as to in what proportion the loss would be distributed, i.e., to say whether the loss would also be borne by a minor immediately on attaining majority in any year.the partnership consists of 15 partners some of whom were minors. there is a preamble to the partnership deed. clause (wiz) thereof is as follows : whereas the party of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //