Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian partnership act Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2013 Page 2 of about 13 results (0.047 seconds)

Jun 18 2013 (HC)

M/S.Centralroadlines Corporatio Vs. M/S.Steel Authority of Indialtd. a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-18-2013

..... ?. (8) whether the plaintiff is entitled to the interest prayed for ?. (9) to what relief ?. additional issue: whether the plaintiff is registered partnership firm and whether the person who is representing the plaintiff in the suit is a partner of the same?. the evidence was recorded with reference to o ..... 8) whether the plaintiff is entitled to the lien prayed for ?. (9) to what relief ?. additional issue: (1) whether the plaintiff is a registered partnership firm and whether the person who is representing the plaintiff in the suit is partner of the same ?. o.s.no.54 of 1995: (1) whether defendants ..... this suit is barred by order 2 rule 2 c.p.c.?. (10) to what relief ?. additional issues: (1) whether the plaintiff is a registered partnership firm and whether the person who is representing the plaintiff in the suit is partner of the same ?. o.s.no.36 of 1995: (1) whether ..... of 1995 filed by the appellant, for recovery of damages, by invoking section 9 of the act, is not maintainable, since there was no compliance of section 10 of the act. she placed reliance upon m/s.indian drugs and pharmaceuticals ltd., hyderabad, versus m/s.savani transport p. ltd., hyderabad3. it ..... company. naturally, this process involved a considerable expenditure. there was no specific order, as such, passed by the appellant terminating the contract, alleging the acts of negligence on the part of the 1st respondent. even the 1st respondent did not object for transporting the goods through other mode. as a matter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2013 (HC)

Smt. Monangi Lakshmi and OThe Vs. Sri Andhravarapu Gowrishankara Rao a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-31-2013

..... of the deceased besides proved from ex.a.5 partnership deed, ex.a.4 proceedings of the excise superintendent referred in ex.a.2 and ex.a.8 also and even in the cross-examination of the p.w.1 ..... . pan card showing date of birth 16.11.1962), which occurrence is covered by ex.a.1 first information report in cr.no.36 of 2000 under section 304-a ipc, and also proved from ex.a.3 m.v. report and evidence of p.w.1 with reference to it and of the eye witness p.w.2. the avocation ..... and nagappa v. gurudayal singh7 that compensation which appears to it to be just, has to be assessed and awarded by the tribunal set up under section 166 of the act. the expression 'just compensation' has been explained in sarla verma`s case (cited supra) holding that the compensation awarded by the tribunal does not become just compensation merely because the ..... ., the rider, owner and insurer of the crime vehicle(scooter)for enhancement of compensation as prayed for in the claim petition under section 166 of the motor vehicle act,1988 (for short, 'the act').2. heard sri venkateswara rao gudipati, the learned counsel for the appellants, sri b.somashekharan, the learned standing counsel the 3rd respondent-national insurance company limited and sri .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 2013 (HC)

Sri Venkata Ramana Arcade, Nellore,being Vs. Y.Vijaya Lakshmamma (Died ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-02-2013

..... taxes, electricity charges and municipal tap charges for the entire building, including the e.p.schedule property. the petitioner firm had entered into a partnership agreement in respect of the business with r.vijaya varma and his associate, alluri atchuta rama raju, on 22.07.2004 itself and was running ..... and that the petitioner firm was in possession and enjoyment of the said property on behalf of and through r.vijaya varma owing to the partnership agreement which existed between them. the third respondent herein filed a counter to this e.a.contending that the same was not permissible in law ..... property to r.vijaya varma and his associate, alluri atchuta rama raju, on 22.07.2004. the petitioner firm claimed that it was in partnership with the said r.vijaya varma and his associate, alluri atchuta rama raju, and was carrying on business in home appliances under the name and ..... 5 scc117the hon'ble sr.justice sanjay kumar civil revision petition nos.4257 of2012and1646of2013c o m m o n order sr.venkata ramana arcade, nellore, a partnership firm, is the petitioner in these two civil revision petitions. the genesis of this lis can be traced to o.s.no.138 of 1994 instituted ..... purpose of allowing the amendment, per the court, should be to minimize litigation. in revajeetu builders v/s. narayanaswamy6 on an analysis of english and indian case law, the supreme court carved out the following principles which should weigh with the court while dealing with an application for amendment: (1) whether .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //