Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian partnership act Court: chhattisgarh Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.013 seconds)

Oct 31 2007 (HC)

V.G. Tamaskar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Oct-31-2007

Reported in : AIR2008Chh33

..... goods has a liabilty to pay tax impugned in the petition, each one has his own independent cause of action a firm as understood under the partnership act or a company as understood under the indian companies act, if it is entitled to commerce action either in the firm name or in the companys name, can do so by filing a petition for the ..... the petition is filed by/on behalf of a society/union then the following particulars have to be mentioned:that the society/union has been registered under the societies registration act and, if registered that the petition has been accompanied by certificate of registration, certified as true copy.that the society/union passed any resolution empowering the person through whom the ..... benefit of the company or the partnership and in such a case court fee would be payable depending upon the legal status of the petitioner. but it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2007 (HC)

Meva Devi and ors. Etc. Vs. Omprakash Jagannath Agrawal and ors. Etc.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Oct-03-2007

Reported in : AIR2008Chh13

..... that there was a partition of joint family business between father and his only son, however they continued the business in the name of partnership firm. the son formed a joint family with his own son. the father died intestate and the amount outstanding to the credit of deceased ..... partition and alleged acknowledgment given by ramkishan and baijnath has not been adduced in evidence and proved. the application under section 65 of the indian evidence act for permission to lead secondary evidence of memorandum of partition was allowed by the trial court however, the defendants moved a civil revision no. ..... on the issue in controvery. in those circumstances, the trial court ought to have drawn adverse inference against the plaintiffs under section 114 of the indian evidence act. reliance is placed on gopal krishnaji ketkar v. mohamed haji latif : [1968]3scr862 .d. referring to document of ex. d-3, it ..... destroyed or lost. the plaintiffs slp against the above order was also dismissed by the apex court. referring to section 91 of the indian evidence act, it is argued that the case of the plaintiff is based on memorandum of oral partition and acknowledgment of partition executed by the ..... of the property, except the document itself, or secondary evidence of its contents where secondary evidence is admissible.17. section 91 of the evidence act is reproduced hereinbelow:91. evidence of terms of contracts, grants and other dispositions of property reduced to form of document.- when the terms of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //