Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Jun-22-2004
Reported in : AIR2004Jhar143; [2004(4)JCR626(Jhr)]
..... evidence oral and documentary on the record the following facts are admitted facts :--plaintiff no. 1 m/s. makhan lal har narayan @ hari narayan is a partnership firm registered under the indian partnership act and it carried the business as bankers, general merchants and commission agents having its office at jharia in the district of dhanbad and it also stands registered under ..... 3. the case of the plaintiffs-appellant (hereinafter referred to as the 'plaintiffs'), in brief is that the plaintiffs are a partnership firm registered under the indian partnership act and also registered under the provisions of section 4 of the bihar moneylenders act, 1938 and they carry on business as bankers, general merchants and commission agents. it is alleged that defendant-respondent no. ..... the provisions of section 4 of bihar moneylenders act, 1938. ext. 1 and ext. 2 are referred to in respect thereof. defendant no. 1 m/s. karamchand ..... thapar and brothers (p) limited is a company duly incorporated under the indian companies act and its registered office is at calcutta and its central office is at bhowra, jharia in the district of dhanbad. defendant no. 1 was the managing agent/secretaries and treasurers .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Sep-09-2004
Reported in : [2004(4)JCR188(Jhr)]
..... lakhs by way of working capital. the respondent nos. 1 and 2 had obtained registration certificate under the bihar sales tax act and the outlet was operated by the said partnership firm from 19.1.1997 to 30.6.1997. during the said period the business of the firm flourished and registered a ..... and practice as to receivers, 16th edition, learned counsel urged that the court will not, as the matter of course, appoint a receiver of the partnership assets, even where a case for dissolution is made. the court will not appoint a receiver, unless some special ground for its interference is established and ..... registered as misc. case no. 21 of 2004. it was contended that the petrol pump belonged to the petitioner-company and there cannot be any partnership agreement between the respondent nos. 1 and 2 in respect of the same. the petitioner-company has only given licence to the award debtor to operate ..... respondent no. 1 and to freeze the bank account which was being operated jointly by the respondent nos. 1 and 2 under an agreement of partnership. thereafter respondent no. 2 submitted an affidavit confirming that the same will not be repeated in future. the company had then given further opportunity to ..... of scheduled tribe. however, dispute arose between the respondent nos. 1 and 2 in respect of the said partnership which led to a reference petition under section 11 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 before the patna high court, which was registered as request case no. 2 of 1998. in the .....Tag this Judgment!