Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian partnership act Court: jharkhand Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 7 results (0.016 seconds)

Apr 23 2016 (HC)

Shri Ramesh Prasad Sao Vs. Union of India Through Secretary Ministry o ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-23-2016

..... the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(c) no. 2722 of 2015 with w.p.(c) no. 3921 of 2015 m/s thakur prasad sao, a partnership firm registered under the indian partnership act, chaibasa, through one of its partners, sri sandeep sao, chaibasa, singhbhum west .. petitioners (in both cases) versus the union of india through the ministry of mines, new delhi ..... . learned counsel for the petitioners have jointly and fairly stated that this court is not required to make any comment upon the inter-se dispute between the parties relating to partnership firm. it is the lessee, who is required to obtain statutory clearances. learned counsel for the petitioner have therefore prayed for reasonable time of 6 months for obtaining statutory clearances ..... at the instance of the petitioner should not be construed as an expression of opinion by this court on the claim of the petitioner as a partner in the reconstituted partnership firm namely, m/s thakur prasad sao. mr. k. venugopal, the learned senior counsel for the respondent nos. 3 -3- to 6 at this stage submits that the petitioner should ..... not obtained the statutory clearances like environment and forest clearances, revised approved plan by the indian bureau of mines, consent to operate by the state pollution control board and certificate of the competent authority under the scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006. lessee is also required to satisfy the terms and conditions of the lease .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 2016 (HC)

Ms Thakur Prasad Sao Through One of Its Partners Sri Sandeep Sao Vs. T ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-23-2016

..... the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(c) no. 2722 of 2015 with w.p.(c) no. 3921 of 2015 m/s thakur prasad sao, a partnership firm registered under the indian partnership act, chaibasa, through one of its partners, sri sandeep sao, chaibasa, singhbhum west .. petitioners (in both cases) versus the union of india through the ministry of mines, new delhi ..... . learned counsel for the petitioners have jointly and fairly stated that this court is not required to make any comment upon the inter-se dispute between the parties relating to partnership firm. it is the lessee, who is required to obtain statutory clearances. learned counsel for the petitioner have therefore prayed for reasonable time of 6 months for obtaining statutory clearances ..... at the instance of the petitioner should not be construed as an expression of opinion by this court on the claim of the petitioner as a partner in the reconstituted partnership firm namely, m/s thakur prasad sao. mr. k. venugopal, the learned senior counsel for the respondent nos. 3 -3- to 6 at this stage submits that the petitioner should ..... not obtained the statutory clearances like environment and forest clearances, revised approved plan by the indian bureau of mines, consent to operate by the state pollution control board and certificate of the competent authority under the scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006. lessee is also required to satisfy the terms and conditions of the lease .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 2016 (HC)

Mahali Sahu and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-05-2016

..... had allowed the parties to compound the offences. it is true that the provision of schedule caste and schedule tribes (prevention of atrocities) act is not compoundable but as it is dependent on other provisions of indian penal code, same can also be compounded in view of the ratio decided in gian singh vs. state of punjab (supra). the respondent ..... permission of the court. in respect of serious offences like murder, rape, dacoity, etc., or other offences of mental depravity under ipc or offences of moral turpitude under special statutes, like the prevention of corruption act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity, the settlement between the offender and the victim can have no ..... , cannot be construed to be personal in nature as the same affects public peace and tranquility.12. the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989 is a special act enacted with an object to prevent the commission of offences of atrocities against the members of the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes, to provide for special courts ..... legal sanction at all. however, certain offences which overwhelmingly and predominantly bear civil flavour having arisen out of civil, mercantile, commercial, financial, partnership or such like transactions or the offences .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2016 (HC)

Arun Kumar Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-10-2016

..... so far as the prayer with respect to quashing of the entire criminal proceedings is concerned, although the dispute was initiated -3- with respect to the partnership business being carried on by the accused nos. 1 and 2 with the complainant but subsequently when the complainant had approached the petitioner, the petitioner and the ..... with accused no.3. it has been submitted that the entire dispute is between the complainant and accused no. 1 and 2 with respect to the partnership business and the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. learned counsel while assailing the order dated 25.01.2012 by which the bail bond ..... the complainant subsequently and considering the said fact cognizance was taken for the offences punishable under sections 323 and 504 of the indian penal code and under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act. thus, a prima facie case is made out against the accused persons and, therefore, no illegality has been committed by ..... as accused no.4. it has been alleged that the accused no. 1 and 2 had entered into a deed of partnership for carrying a business of manufacturing and selling of cement and the deed of partnership was executed by the accused nos. 1 and 2 with the complainant on 03.12.2013. subsequently the ..... partnership business failed and accused nos. 1 and 2 had given two cheques which were presented in the bhurkunda branch wherein both the cheques .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2016 (HC)

Goyal Salt Pvt Limited Through Its Director Sri Parmesh Goyal Vs. The ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-18-2016

..... confusion in the mind of the public. it has been stated that the trade mark idea has been registered in a different classes by a number of individual proprietorship concern, partnership concern, private limited companies and other manufacturers who manufacture several kinds of goods/commodities and which has no concern with each other and have been permitted to register their good ..... . it has also been submitted that since no ingredients of cheating has been made out in terms of the allegations and since the offences with respect to trade marks act as well as indian penal code are interlinked and interwoven the first information report instituted against the petitioner deserves to be quashed. in this context, learned counsel has also referred to the ..... interlined with each other and since it has been held that no criminal prosecution can be allowed to be continued for the offences under the trade marks act, the continuation of the proceedings under the indian penal code also becomes a nullity. moreover, the essence of cheating having not been made out in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner ..... of idea salt was recovered which is a direct infringement on the trade mark of idea cellular company and, therefore, the provisions of the trade marks act as well as section 420/34 of the indian penal code having been attracted, the present application is liable to be dismissed. the arguments which have been advanced by the learned counsel for the parties .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 2016 (HC)

Praveen Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Sep-05-2016

..... of high court as decided earlier in b.s. joshi (supra) and held that offences which overwhelmingly and predominantly bear civil flavour having arisen out of civil, mercantile, commercial, financial, partnership or like such transactions or the offences arising out of matrimony particularly relating to dowry etc. or the family disputes and the parties have settled all the disputes amicably irrespective ..... .2013 passed by learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, hazaribagh in complaint case no.595 of 2011 whereby after taking cognizance of the offence under sections 498a and 323 of the indian penal code against the petitioner and other accused persons, direction has been given to file requisites for appearance of the accused persons.2. bereft of the unnecessary details, the facts ..... the ends of justice would prevent women from settling earlier. that is not the object of chapter xx-a of the indian penal code. section 320 of the code sets out the details of offences in different tables, which are compoundable by the parties and those, which are compoundable with leave of ..... husband and his relatives who harass or torture the wife to coerce her or her relatives to satisfy unlawful demands of dowry. the hypertechnical view would be counterproductive and would act against interests of women and against the object for which this provision was added. there is every likelihood that non exercise of inherent power to quash the proceedings to meet .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2016 (HC)

Ms Uday Prasad Through Its Partner Uday Prasad Vs. Rural Works Departm ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-13-2016

..... the petitioner. the divisional forest officer, wild life division, hazaribag has also informed respondent no.6 that petitioner along with him would be liable for contravening provisions of indian wild life (protection) act, 1972 and face penal action as no approval from the wild life board has been obtained. no work can be initiated without the statutory environmental clearance and permission from ..... in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p. (c) no. 3303 of 2015 m/s uday prasad, a registered partnership firm having its office at radha gopal gali, chatra through its partner uday prasad .... petitioner vrs.1. the state of jharkhand through its principal secretary, rural work department cum chief .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //