Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian partnership act Court: jharkhand Year: 2017 Page 1 of about 11 results (0.015 seconds)

Nov 18 2017 (HC)

Pande Ratneshwari Prasad Vs. State Through Superintendent of Police Ce ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-18-2017

..... title deeds in the presence of the branch manager/divisional manager and two other employees of the bank. (b) where the property belongs to a partnership firm, all the partners must call at the branch for the purpose. however, if any one or more of the partners cannot call at the ..... upon to do so. it requires to be stamped under article 6 of schedule 1 of the indian stamp 5 act or the corresponding article of the state stamp (amendment) act, and must be registered under the indian registration act. iv. 3.4.6 while creating an equitable mortgage by deposit of title deeds, the following ..... tiwari, learned special judge, cbi cases, ranchi, on 17.05.2016 has taken cognizance of the offence under the aforesaid sections of the ipc and p.c. act.7. on the other hand, learned counsel for the cbi appeared in this case and he has filed counter-affidavit and during course of arguments ..... above panel advocates including the petitioner. on the basis of the aforesaid allegations, the instant fir has been lodged under the aforesaid sections of the indian penal code.4. counsel for the petitioner while pressing bail application, submitted that the only allegation levelled as against the petitioner is that he has ..... fir no.rc0932014s0012 (dated 28.07.2014) of cbi, eow, ranchi, initially registered under sections 120b read with sections 420, 468 and 471 of the indian penal code lodged on the basis of one complaint filed by shri neeraj raja singh, chief manager, state bank of india, sme branch, city centre, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2017 (HC)

Pande Ratneshwari Prasad Vs. State Through Cbi

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-18-2017

..... deeds in the presence of 5 the branch manager/divisional manager and two other employees of the bank. (ii) where the property belongs to a partnership firm, all the partners must call at the branch for the purpose. however, if any one or more of the partners cannot call at the ..... called upon to do so. it requires to be stamped under article 6 of schedule 1 of the indian stamp act or the corresponding article of the state stamp (amendment) act, and must be registered under the indian registration act. iv. 3.4.6 while creating an equitable mortgage by deposit of title deeds, the following ..... k. tiwari, learned special judge, cbi cases, ranchi, on 17.05.2016 has taken cognizance of the offence under the aforesaid sections of the ipc and p.c. act.7. he submits that as the trial will take some time, the petitioner be enlarged on anticipatory bail.8. on the other hand, learned ..... above panel advocates including the petitioner. on the basis of the aforesaid allegations, the instant fir has been lodged under the aforesaid sections of the indian penal code. 3 4. counsel for the petitioner while pressing bail application, submitted that the only allegation levelled as against the petitioner is that he ..... fir no.rc0932014s0011 (dated 28.07.2014) of cbi, eow, ranchi, initially registered under sections 120b read with sections 420, 468 and 471 of the indian penal code lodged on the basis of one complaint filed by neeraj raja singh, chief manager, state bank of india, sme branch, city centre, sector-iv .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2017 (HC)

Dinesh Kumar Nag Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through the Chief Secretar ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-21-2017

..... has been passed by the director general of police, jharkhand, ranchi. it is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner had a registered partnership firm namely m/s. dinesh kumar nag under class ii contractor in the road construction department, government of jharkhand. the petitioner had claimed to ..... sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 506, 379, 435, 427, 353, 307 of the indian penal code, section 27 of the arms act and section 17 of the criminal law amendment act in which the petitioner was arrested on 27.01.2017. the petitioner claims that on account of a clipping in ..... and to fill up the lacuna subsequently which is apparent in view of the first supplementary counter affidavit filed by the state, the state has acted thus and the same should be condemned. learned counsel further submits that on the face of second counter affidavit the order of the director ..... further pointed out that a designated authority is defined in section 2(e) of the act but concerned principal secretary being not designated by the state government he was not authorized to either confirm or revoke any order of attachment. pursuant ..... management, government of jharkhand, ranchi. it has been stated that the statutory period of sixty days in terms of section 25(3) of the act for either confirming or revoking the order of attachment was not passed and, therefore, the order of attachment itself has become redundant. learned counsel has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 09 2017 (HC)

Ms Industrial Associates Through Its Authorised Signatory Debasis Sark ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-09-2017

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi arbitration application no. 14 of 2016 m/s industrial associates, a registered partnership, registered under the partnership act, 1932, having its office at 238b, a.j.c. bose road, 2nd floor, kolkata-700020, through its authorised signatory debasis sarkar, son of shri kishori mohan sarkar, resident of 65, ..... road, p.o. & p.s. behala, circus avenue, district kolkata-700034 (wb) petitioner versus m/s hindustan copper limited, a company registered under the companies act, 1956, a government of india enterprise, having its registered office at indian copper complex , p.o. & p.s. ghatshila, district east singbhum ` ... ... respondent ------ coram: hon'ble mr. justice d.n. patel ----- for the petitioner: mrs. darshana ..... not appointed the learned arbitrator. now, after filing of this application under section 11(6) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, the respondents can not appoint arbitrator as held by hon'ble the supreme court in deep trading company versus indian oil corporation and others reported in (2013) 4 scc35 at paragraph no.s 19 and 22, which are quoted as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 2017 (HC)

Manoj Kumar Chandra Alias Manoj Kumar Agrawal Alias Manoj Kumar Vs. St ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-07-2017

..... fact that the parties in writing are calling it trust would not attract the offence of the criminal breach of trust.8. admittedly, after the partnership business between the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 failed, a loan was taken from the opposite party no. 2 which with interest had ..... case as well as the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the respective parties is that the entire dispute started after initiation of the partnership business between the petitioner and the opposite party no.2. agreements were executed between the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 and certain ..... that the opposite party no. 2 is basically an unlicensed money lender. it has been stated that the entire dispute is with respect to the partnership business and since there is no element of criminal breach of trust present in the allegations levelled in the complaint and the dispute being predominantly civil ..... law and younger brother of the petitioner of wholesale medicine. it has been stated that the opposite party no. 2 had resigned from the said partnership firm and had settled his accounts as per the deed of dissolution. learned senior counsel has submitted that the petitioner had taken a loan in ..... virtue of the deed of dissolution, the opposite party no. 2 opted out from the said partnership business after settlement of his account. in order to come to a conclusion as to whether the act of the petitioner would invite an offence of criminal breach of trust, it would be necessary to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 2017 (HC)

Rajesh Kumar Vs. The Central Bureau of Investigation a C B Through Sup ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-29-2017

..... of the petitiioner sadanand gupta has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. further, it has been submitted that the m/s sadanand gupta is a partnership frim and the petitioner is one of the partner of the said firm. further, it has been submitted that the c.b.i after completion of investigation, submitted charge sheet ..... fresh guideline and hike in the construction rate ie. 174 above of dsr 2007. it is submitted that as per the allegation made against the petitioner that due to the act of the petitioner, the central university of jharkhand has suffered wrongful loss of rs. 92,65,613/ but as a matter of fact the central university of jharkhand has retained ..... such no question of wrongful loss could arise from the part of the petitioner. it is submitted tht as per the allegation made against the petitioner that due to the act of the petitioner, the central university of jharkhand has suffered wrongful loss of rs. 57,66,991/ but as a matter of fact, the central university of jharkhand is a ..... connection with r.c 11(a)/2014 r for the offence registered under sections 120b, 420, 468 and 471 of the indian penal code and under section 13(2) read with section 13(1(d) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 pending in the court of shri b.k. tiwary, special judge, c.b. i(a.c.b), ranchi. the case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 2017 (HC)

Ms Singhbhum Mineral Company Represented Through One of Its Partner Sh ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-07-2017

..... 2509 of 2016 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p. (c) no. 2509 of 2016 ------- 1.m/s singhbhum mineral company, a partnership firm, having its office at station road, post box no. 24, chaibasa 833201, district west singhbhum, represented through one of its partner shri harilal varjang rathor ..... that before granting approval for second or subsequent renewal of a mining lease, the state government shall seek a report from the controller general, indian bureau of mines, as to whether it would be in the interest of mineral development to grant the renewal of the mining lease: provided further ..... was due and payable on the part of petitioner and noc was accorded by the d.c., chaibasa and further mining scheme was also approved by indian bureau of mines vide letter dated 03.05.2012 under rule 12 of mineral conservation and development rules, 1988. thereafter, in compliance of guidelines of ..... to the petitioner in the light of judgment delivered in the case of common cause (supra) in accordance with relevant provisions of mmdr act and mc act, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.19. ..... mining plan as per the provisions of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to mmdr act, 1957 for the sake of brevity) and mineral (conservation & development) rules and the said mining was duly approved by indian bureau of mines (ibm) vide letter dated 13.05.1998. it has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2017 (HC)

Suresh Pradhan and Anr Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-11-2017

..... prasad sinha were the partners of a partnership firm which was running in the name and style of shashank nidhi & associates and after following the legal formalities the said firm was converted into ..... magistrate, saraikella whereby and whereunder cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 504 and 506 of the indian penal code is, hereby, quashed and set aside. the opposite party no. 2 is always at liberty to approach the competent civil court for redressal ..... magistrate, saraikella whereby and whereunder cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 504 and 506 of the indian penal code. a first information report was instituted by the opposite party no. 2 in which it was alleged that the informant and one suresh ..... a.p.p. has further reiterated what has been stated by the learned for the opposite party no. 2 with respect to the previous criminal acts of the petitioners leading to institution of several criminal cases against him. a recital of the complaint case initially filed would reveal that the agreement ..... further submits that even in course of investigation no evidence has surfaced with respect to any criminal act on the part of the petitioners to constitute an offence under sections 420 and 406 of the indian penal code. it has also been stated that the agreement admittedly was entered in the year .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2017 (HC)

Birendra Kumar Alias Virender Kumar Vs. The Central Bureau of Investig ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-18-2017

..... 2011 with total loan amount amounting to rs. 2.59 crores plus accrued interest calculated till july, 2013. investigation revealed that m/s balaji food & masala co a notarized partnership firm of vivek pratap singh and birendra kumar was sanctioned cash credit of rs. 42 lakh, cash credit of rs. 20 lakh and term loan of rs. 13 lakh ..... said amount by cheque. investigation further revealed that the excess amount of rs. 1.5 lac which was returned to m/s balaji food & masala co by m/s dynamic indian packaging was deposited into the parallel account of m/s balaji food & masala co. (a/c no. 0193 n711080 060) maintained at indusind bank, hazaribagh and was being ..... charge sheet under sections 120b, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the i.p.c and under section 13(2) r/w section 13(1)(d) of the p.c act and cognizance has been taken under the same sections, trial will take some time. so, considering all these facts, the petitioner deserves privilege of anticipatory bail.7. on the ..... the accounts of the company having been declared n.p.a and having been transferred to samb, patna for hard recovery samb, patna proceeded further under the sarfaesi act, 2002 as under: balaji food & masala company present outstanding rs. 2.59 crores. 2 notice u/s 13(2) of the sarfaesi ..... act, 2002 was issued on 27.12.2011 and possession notice under section 13(4) was issued on 09.08.2012 and the sdame was challenged by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2017 (HC)

Ganeshwar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Central Bureau of Inves ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-19-2017

..... same time, but may be reached by successive actions evidencing their joining of the conspiracy.9. it has been said that a criminal conspiracy is a partnership in crime, and that there is in each conspiracy a joint or mutual agency for the prosecution of a common plan. thus, if two or ..... non complicity of the petitioner as angle of the conspiracy which has been alleged against the petitioner constituting an offence under section 120-b of the indian penal code has to be considered only at the appropriate stage. the main crux of argument of learned counsel for the petitioner seems to be ..... , c.b.i. ranchi, by which cognizance has been taken for the office punishable under sections 120b, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the indian penal code. it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the prosecution has not assigned any role whatsoever in the criminal conspiracy so ..... or by deed. however, criminal responsibility for a conspiracy requires more than a merely passive attitude towards an existing conspiracy. one who commits an overt act with knowledge of the conspiracy is guilty. and one who tacitly consents to the object of a conspiracy and goes along with other conspirators, actually ..... of the principles.1. under section 120-a ipc offence of criminal conspiracy is committed when two or more persons agree to do or cause to be done an illegal act or legal act by illegal means. when it is a legal act by illegal means overt act is necessary. offence of criminal conspiracy is an .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //