Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian partnership act Court: madhya pradesh Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.133 seconds)

Apr 09 2013 (HC)

Kirti R Trivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-09-2013

..... , whereas, the complainant could not participate in the partnership since the year 1996 because of ailment of his : 4 : criminal revision no ..... commenced in the year 1997. it is apparent that no registration of partnership firm was done, as required by the provisions of the indian partnership act and therefore, the partnership did not commence. secondly, the partnership was to be commenced in the year 1997 ..... drilling company was shown to be a proprietary concern. if the fir and agreement of partnership is perused then, it was clearly mentioned in the agreement that it shall commence from the year 1997 and if the agreement is silent on any point then, the provisions of indian partnership act shall be applicable. the agreement was executed in the year 1996 and it was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 2013 (HC)

Peekay Enterprises Vs. Northern Coalfields Ltd

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-13-2013

..... certified copy of the registration annexure-a-8c, and, therefore, prima-facie it is seen that the firm is registered in accordance to the requirement of section 59 of the indian partnership act. a.c.no.23/2010 peekay enterprises versus northern coalfields lmt. & ors.so far as delay in raising claim is concerned, the same warrants enquiry into factual aspect of the ..... . it is further clarified that all the objections raised by respondent no.1 with regard to delay in raising the claim and the question of registration or otherwise of the partnership firm is to be decided by the arbitrator, after hearing all concerned in accordance with law. with the aforesaid, the application is allowed and disposed of. (rajendra menon) judge nd ..... smt. amrit ruprah, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri greeshm jain, learned counsel for the respondents. this is an application filed under section 11 (6) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitral tribunal for adjudication of the dispute that has risen between the parties. an agreement annexure-a1 was entered into between the parties on 22 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 2013 (HC)

Dharmendra Bhura Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

..... no.20325/08 whereby in a private complaint filed by him against the respondents for his prosecution of the offence punishable under section 420 of ipc, his documents i.e. the alleged partnership deed and the agreement for partnership in the lack of proper stamp duty, on the same were held to be inadmissible documents with some direction to impound and get validated ..... .9.2010, (ann. r-1) was also passed in this regard, according to which it was held that the aforesaid agreement for partnership and deed of partnership, (annexure p-2) being not properly stamped in accordance with the stamp act, are not admissible documents and such order was never challenged by the applicant herein before any of the superior court and the same ..... orders alongwith the order dated 27.9.2010.5. it is undisputed on record that the aforesaid agreement of partnership and deed of partnership, (annexure p-2, collectively) were not made and prepared on a requisite stamp duty as per requirement of stamp act and its schedule. i am of the considered view that in the civil matters or matters relating to the ..... instrument chargeable with duty shall be admitted in evidence for any purpose by any person having by law or consent of parties authority to receive evidence, or 6 shall be acted upon, registered or authenticated by any such person or by any public officer unless such instrument is duly stamped :- provided that- (a) .. (b)..................... (c)..................... (d) nothing herein contained shall prevent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2013 (HC)

M/S Kutch Brine Chem Industries Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-22-2013

..... p. state civil supply corporation on 20 th april, 2013, petitioner has filed this writ petition.2. petitioner claims to be a duly registered partnership firm engaged in the business of processing , manufacturing, sale and supply of refined iodized salt (herein after referred as "ris"). it is said ..... gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner at length read the conditions of the tender and referred to the provisions of the bureau of indian standards act, 1986. the definition of indian standard, license 5 specification and standard mark as stipulated therein in section 2 (g), (j), (s) and (t), took ..... can be easily identified and it can be put to such a testing and processing of inspection as contemplated under the bureau of indian standards act, 1986 and rules of 1987 and regulations of 1988 framed thereunder so that the quality of the product being supplied can be maintained ..... arbitrary condition. it is said that the petitioner possesses the requisite statutory isi grade and standard notified by the bureau of indian standard in accordance to the act of 1986, the rules and regulations framed therein and once the petitioner is a requisite license holder, licensed under the ..... regulations of 1988") is available i.e. a supplier or manufacturer like the petitioner, merely because the manufacturer or supplier is not using the indian standard certification mark on the product namely "the isi mark", it is said that prohibiting such a manufacturer amounts to discrimination and is unsustainable. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 2013 (HC)

Bank of Baroda Vs. Reliable Construction Company

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-10-2013

..... adjudication. appeal stands allowed."(emphasis supplied) 4. shri mehndiratta, learned counsel for the petitioners took us through the provision of section 13 of the act and argued that every measure initiated under section 13 is an independent action and when against every measure an appeal could be filed under section ..... to the respondent company to take recourse to the alternate remedy available under the act. the company again filed a writ appeal before this court being w.a. no.218/2009 3 and in the writ appeal also certain ..... .2009 annexure p/2 a single bench of this court found that efficacious remedy is available under section 17 of the debts recovery tribunal act by way of an appeal to the tribunal, therefore, certain protection was given to the respondent company and the petition disposed of with liberty ..... original application and writ petitions before this court and the debts recovery tribunal. finally, when certain proceedings were held under section 13 of the sarfaesi act, 2002 and notices for auctioning was published. the respondent company approached this court by filing a writ petition no.2318/2009. vide order dated ..... (hereinafter referred to as "sarfaesi act of 2002"), this writ petition has been filed by the bank in question. 2 2. facts in brief go to show that the respondent company namely m/s reliable construction company is a partnership firm having its registered office in madan mahal, jabalpur. it .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //