Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian partnership act Court: mumbai goa Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.036 seconds)

Apr 02 2014 (HC)

M/S Reshmi Constructions Vs. Laxman Vithal Chunekar and Another

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Apr-02-2014

..... had no other alternative but to deposit the same in his personal account. he read out the provisions of sections 4, 9, 10, 14, 15, 19 and 22 of indian partnership act, 1932 ('the act') and submitted that shri pandharinath chafadkar being the partner of the complainant was the agent of the said firm and hence, he was bound to transfer the said amount ..... , he did not need any power of attorney to file complaint or to depose on behalf of the complainant. 16. (a) section 4 of the act lays down as under: 4. definition of "partnership", "partner", firm" and "firm name"- "partnership" is the relation between persons who have agreed to share the profits of a business carried on by all or any of them ..... against the firm, (f) acquire immovable property on behalf of the firm, (g) transfer immovable property belonging to the firm, or (h) enter into partnership on behalf of the firm.? 17. from the above provisions of the act, it is clear that every partner is an agent of the firm and his other partners for the purpose of business of the firm ..... acting for all. persons who have entered into partnership with one another are called individually "partners" and collectively "a firm", and the name under which their business is carried on is called the "firm name".? (b) section 9 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 2014 (HC)

Kamrudin J. Mavany, Since deceased, through L.R.s. and Others Vs. Tajd ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Sep-01-2014

..... provisions of the said decree read with the provisions of portuguese commercial code, 1888, ??society per quotas ? cannot be equated with a partnership, under the indian partnership act, 1932 and that the same is nothing but a company and therefore, the finding of the learned single judge and the learned civil judge ..... senior division to the effect that ??society per quotas ? is a partnership is erroneous, since the above provisions have not been considered. he ..... 1986 afresh by considering the submissions now made in the present review application and to decide whether the said ??society per quotas ? is a partnership firm or a company and whether the provisions of article 1365 of the portuguese civil code are applicable to it or not. 8. in ..... the property 'udego' or 'mestabata' bearing registration no. 9795 was sold to partnership which consisted of the sons of the deceased and there was no dispute about this factual position. in paragraph 3 of the impugned order dated ..... civil judge senior division reveals that both the parties had made submissions by taking it for granted that said ??society per quotas ? is a partnership consisting of sons of the deceased. in paragraph 13 of the order dated 05.03.1992, the learned civil judge senior division has observed that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2014 (HC)

M/s Lithoferro, a partnership firm, Goa represented herein by its Part ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Aug-13-2014

..... renewal for 20 years, subject to satisfaction that the mining was in the interest of mining development. (f) the government of goa introduced the indian stamp act (goa amendment) act, 2012; (g) demand notices were issued to the petitioners individually, asking them to pay the enhanced stamp duty. the petitioners, accordingly, deposited ..... the petitioners whose leases were decided to be renewed, to pay the enhanced stamp duty in accordance with the amended provisions of the indian stamp act. the order discloses that the government, in principle, has agreed for renewal of the mining leases and the concerned leaseholders were directed ..... 24-a of the mc rules for a period of 20 years from 2007 to 2027. (iv) the state government, thereafter, introduced the indian stamp act (goa amendment) 2012, which came into effect from 14th november, 2012 and issued demand notices to the petitioners seeking payment of stamp duty ..... petitioners filed applications for renewal of the second renewal of the mining leases. (ii) mining plans for the second renewal were approved by the indian bureau of mines (ibm). the government of goa, thereafter, recommended the second renewals and sought report of the ibm. (iii) the ibm ..... -a. on 19th december, 1961, goa was liberated and became a part of indian union. on 1st october, 1963, the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (hereinafter, referred to as ??the mmdr act") was made applicable to the union territory of goa. prior to liberation of goa .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //