Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian partnership act Court: rajasthan jodhpur Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.017 seconds)

Jul 25 2013 (HC)

Kana Ram Burdak Vs. State (Chief Secretary) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-25-2013

..... the respondent rakesh dhariwal made an abortive attempt to unsettle and dwindle the same and in his that pursuit laid an application under section 64 of the indian partnership act 1932 (for brevity, hereinafter referred to as act of 1932) before the registrar of firms on 20th of september 2010. taking cognizance of the said application of the respondent, the registrar served notice ..... spurious signatures and preparation of fabricated documents are serious in nature on which a thorough enquiry is required. depriving an individual from his right and interest in a [16] partnership firm by practicing alleged fraud is an issue of great significance which requires thorough probe. despite availability of umpteen materials including the rfsl report supporting the cause of the ..... aukna, bhanwarlal choudhary, rakesh kumar dhariwal and kana ram burdak (petitioner in s.b. civil writ petition no. 9873 of 2011) started business of marble mining and trading. the partnership deed was duly registered with the registrar of firms on 17th of november 2008. as transpired from the averments in the petition, uptil march 2009 the firm continued its pursuit ..... at the instance of one of the partners of the firm who is alleged to have retired after reconstitution of the partnership. the court further proceeded to make following observations to circumscribe the provisions contained under section 64 of the act of 1932 in para 24 of the order:24. as noticed above, the registrar had simply no jurisdiction whatsoever .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2013 (HC)

M/S. Balaji Marble Mines, Makrana Vs. State (Chief Secretary) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-25-2013

..... the respondent rakesh dhariwal made an abortive attempt to unsettle and dwindle the same and in his that pursuit laid an application under section 64 of the indian partnership act 1932 (for brevity, hereinafter referred to as act of 1932) before the registrar of firms on 20th of september 2010. taking cognizance of the said application of the respondent, the registrar served notice ..... spurious signatures and preparation of fabricated documents are serious in nature on which a thorough enquiry is required. depriving an individual from his right and interest in a [16] partnership firm by practicing alleged fraud is an issue of great significance which requires thorough probe. despite availability of umpteen materials including the rfsl report supporting the cause of the ..... aukna, bhanwarlal choudhary, rakesh kumar dhariwal and kana ram burdak (petitioner in s.b. civil writ petition no. 9873 of 2011) started business of marble mining and trading. the partnership deed was duly registered with the registrar of firms on 17th of november 2008. as transpired from the averments in the petition, uptil march 2009 the firm continued its pursuit ..... at the instance of one of the partners of the firm who is alleged to have retired after reconstitution of the partnership. the court further proceeded to make following observations to circumscribe the provisions contained under section 64 of the act of 1932 in para 24 of the order:24. as noticed above, the registrar had simply no jurisdiction whatsoever .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2013 (HC)

Kalani Industries Pvt. Ltd Vs. State of Raj. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Aug-06-2013

..... contention raised on behalf of power producers, the apex court further held that once the parties entered into a contract or ppa(s) (public partnership agreement), they cannot refuse to adhere to the terms of the contract merely because a term of contract later on is not found to be ..... prices fixed by the central government for sale of rice are seasonable prices not being based upon any cogent material.18. in the case indian aluminum company (supra), where the petitioner-company challenged the issuance of the notification by the kerala state electricity board enhancing the tariff rate for ..... agreement also had renewal clause empowering transco/aptransco/ board to revise the tariff. thus, the documents executed by these parties and their conduct of acting upon such agreements over a long period bind them to the rights and obligations stated in the contract. the parties can hardly deny the facts ..... signed by the parties at different stages. it is also not posible to accept the view of the tribunal that the regulatory commission has acted in contradiction or conflict with the state policy. the state was not intending to provide incentive and concessions with assurance of buy-back to ..... , misrepresentation, undue influence etc.) in such violation of the regulations, in which event cancellation of the transfer is inevitable. if the transferee had acted bona fide and was blameless, it may be possible to save the transfer but that again would depend upon the answer to the further question .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 2013 (HC)

C.i.T., Bikaner Vs. Poonam Chand Surana

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Nov-09-2013

..... he filed the returns at chennai for the reasons best known to him. other facts have also been referred to suggest that the assessee entered into partnership business of m/s vardhman industry at suratgarh and, in the application submitted to the commercial taxes department, declared his d.b.income tax appeal no ..... .k.mathur mr.k.k.bissa, for the appellant. by the court: by way of this appeal under section 260-a of the income tax act, 1961 [ the act ]., the revenue seeks to question the order dated 17.05.2013 passed by the income tax appellate tribunal, jodhpur bench, jodhpur [ itat ].in ..... on 06.04.2004, which were subsequently dropped on 18.10.2005. thereafter, on 03.04.2006, the proceedings under section 147/148 of the act were initiated but then, a proposal for transfer of jurisdiction from chennai to suratgarh was made only on 24.07.2007, which ultimately materialized on 21. ..... re-assessment proceedings, the ito, suratgarh started the proceedings under section 127 of the act for transfer of the respondent s case from chennai to suratgarh. meanwhile, the respondent-assessee filed a writ petition in this court against initiation of re ..... and reiterated the request for transfer of the records to chennai. the respondent- assessee objected to the initiation of proceedings under section 147 of the act but the objections were rejected by the ito by his order dated 05.07.2007. it is borne out that about 15 months after initiation of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //