Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian partnership act Page 4 of about 36,504 results (0.101 seconds)

Dec 19 1969 (HC)

Seth Sobhag Mal Lodha and ors. Vs. Edward Mills Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [1972]42CompCas1(Raj); 1969()WLN498

..... on behalf of the firm. there was, therefore, no question of realising the property of a dissolved firm. after the partition suit the firm began to be governed by the indian partnership act. in this view of the matter, subsection (3) of section 69 will not apply to this case to enable the plaintiffs to file a suit without the registration of the ..... the necessary incidence and the resolution on the demises of the partners, if it could be deemed to have continued after their deaths, stood dissolved under section 42 of the indian partnership act on defendant no. 2's adjudication as insolvent3. that the provisions in the memorandum of association and the articles of association of the company relating to the management are merely ..... the filing of the partition suit, the status of the joint family underwent a change and the business became a partnership business. under section 69 of the indian partnership act, 1932, no suit could have been instituted unless the partnership was registered. section 69 of the indian partnership act, 1932, runs as follows :' (1) no suit to enforce a right arising from a contract or conferred by ..... joint family, even if it was joint, was changed and thereafter as the business was carried on jointly, the firm became an ordinary partnership concern subject to the indian partnership act. as the firm was not registered, section 69 of the partnership act stood in the way of filing the suit without the registration of the firm.8. that in the balance-sheet a sum of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 1996 (HC)

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hassan Chand and Sons

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [1997]224ITR244(Raj)

..... and to pay to the guardian of his estate an equal share in the profits of the new firm in accordance with the provisions contained in section 37 of the indian partnership act, 1932. the guardian was not to bear the losses which were to be shared equally by the two remaining partners who were to carry on the business. shri abdul razaq ..... invalid merely because the continuing partners and the guardian of the heirs of the deceased noor mohammed, made efforts to give effect to the provisions of section 37 of the indian partnership act.13. regarding the question as to whether payments made to the guardian of the heirs of the deceased shri noor mohammed were deductible as a charge in arriving at the ..... . he held the view that the guardian of the heirs of the deceased partner constituted the third partner in the firm and, therefore, the provisions of section 37 of the indian partnership act, 1932, did not apply to the case.10. having lost its case before the income-tax officer and the appellate assistant commissioner for both the years, the assessee-firm approached ..... december 31, 1958, no profits were attributable to the use of his share in the properties of the firm so as to attract the provisions of section 57 of the indian partnership act, 1932, to the facts of the present case. the income-tax officer, therefore, held that neither the application was signed by all the partners nor were the profits and losses .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 1964 (HC)

N.Sp.N. Nagappa Chettiar Firm, Madurai Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1965Mad424; [1965]56ITR569(Mad)

..... the previous year; and (2), before the end of the previous year in any other case; (b) where the firm is registered under the indian partnership act, 1932, or where the deed of partnership is registered under the indian registration act, 1908 before the end of the previous year of that firm; and (c) where the application is for renewal of registration under rule 6, ..... year of assessment subsequent thereto be made......... (a) where the firm is not registered under the indian partnership act, 1932, or where the deed of partnership is not registered under the indian registration act, 1908 and the application for registration is being made for the first time under the act, (1) within a period of six months of the constitution of the firm or before the ..... assessee could make the application before the end of the previous year. in the other class of cases where the firm is registered under the partnership act or where the deed of partnership is registered under the indian registration act, the application should be made before the end of the previous year.looking at the rule closely, it is seen that there are only ..... really two classes. where the firm had been already in existence in the past, whether it was registered under the partnership act or the deed of partnership had been registered .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 25 1968 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Janab N. Hyath Batcha Sahib

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1969]72ITR528(Mad)

..... does not appear to cloud or destroy the identity of the partners whose rights and liabilities vis-a-vis each other are governed by the terms of the partnership and the provisions of the indian partnership act. the members of a firm, from a certain point of view, therefore, remain as co-owners in a limited sense and subject to the terms of the ..... the property, though it is true b, by reason of the transaction, becomes entitled to certain rights which are regulated by the terms of the agreement of partnership, as well as the provisions of the indian partnership act. where the making over of tangible assets, movable or immovable, is by a certain set of persons to an incorporated company in which the same set ..... conclusion on this reasoning. apart from the foregoing, there are other weighty reasons for concurring with the view of the tribunal. section 14 of the indian partnership act shows the different process or methods by which a firm of partnership may come to possess property. the section says ' the property of the firm includes all property and rights and interests in property originally brought ..... in which two or more persons combine their efforts and conjointly apply the same to a commercial or business activity with a view to make profit. section 4 of the indian partnership act makes this explicit and says that a ' partnership ' is the relation between persons who have agreed to share the profits of a business carried on by all or any of them .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 1969 (HC)

Pl. Rm. Arunachalam Chettiar Vs. Controller of Estate Duty

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1970]75ITR28(Mad)

..... in the instant reference.3. the law seems to be so well settled now that it is impossible to accept mr. thyagarajan's proposition mentioned above. section 29 of the indian partnership act, 1932, which deals with the rights of transfer of a partner's interest, lays down by its second sub-section that, if a firm were dissolved the transferee from an ..... is nothing on record to show that there was anything like an administration of the firm's assets and liabilities involving the various steps contemplated by section 48 of the indian partnership act, 1932, before the residue was divided between the sharers, and from this standpoint too, the deceased's interest in his one-fourth share in the firm's assets was ..... of each partner is, in the words of lindley : 'his proportion of the partnership assets after they have been all realised and converted into money, and all the ..... and particularly the following passage in it:'it is abvious that the act contemplates complete liquidation of the assets of the partnership as a preliminary to the settlement of accounts between partners upon dissolution of the firm and it will, therefore, be correct to say that, for the purposes of the indian partnership act, and irrespective of any mutual agreement between the partners, the share .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1960 (HC)

Kajaria Traders (India) Ltd. Vs. Foreign Import and Export Association

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1961Bom65; (1960)62BOMLR753

..... come up before me under clause 36 of the letters patent for the determination of the questions following:--'whether in view of the provisions contained in section 69 of the indian partnership act, 1932, the present petition is maintainable and what provisions should be made for the costs of the parties to the petition.'there has been a difference of opinion between mr ..... ' used in section 69(3) cannot be construed so as to embrace an application made under section 8 of the indian arbitration act, 1940.17a. in the result, the question whether in view of the provisions contained in section 69 of the indian partnership act, 1932, the present petition is maintainable, is answered in' the affirmative.18. as regards costs, there is no reason to ..... appointed by consent of all the parties. in my view, the right to make an application under section 8 of the arbitration act is not a right arising from a contract within the meaning of section 69 of the indian partnership act, 1932.6. the next point to be considered is whether an application under section 8 is covered by the words 'other proceeding ..... 8 provided there was no other impediment in doing so. mr. justice mudholkar considered that section 69 of the indian partnership act, 1932, constituted such an impediment. mr. justice naik was of the contrary opinion. sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 69 of the indian partnership act, 1932, provide as follows:--'69(1). no suit to enforce a right arising from a contract or conferred .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 24 1953 (HC)

Ganeshnarayan Jagdamba Prasad Vs. Indian Textile Syndicate

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1954Bom91; (1953)55BOMLR857; ILR1954Bom304

..... once he has obtained a decree against a firm, there is an obligation under the partnership law upon each partner to discharge the partnership debt. he says that even in the case of a dissolved partnership under section 49, indian partnership act the obligation of the erstwhile partners to discharge the partnership debt continues, and therefore if a creditor of a firm calls upon the firm to ..... discharge its debt, the liability to discharge that debt is upon each and every partner and the failure to discharge that debt constitutes an act of insolvency on the ..... part of each partner. there is no dispute as to the substantive law embodied in the partnership act and nobody suggests that there is no obligation upon a partner even of a dissolved partnership to discharge the debts of the partnership in the winding up. but what is overlooked by mr. purshottam is that what we have to consider in this ..... it says is that 'any two or more persons being partners or any person carrying on business under a partnership name, may take proceedings or be proceeded against under this act in the name of the firm.'therefore, it is open under the indian law to a creditor to adjudicate a firm insolvent. instead of proceeding against two or three partners individually, he .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 16 1998 (HC)

Varadachary and Company, Hyderabad Vs. Superiniteding Engineer (Operat ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(3)ALD599; 1999(3)ALT431

..... of the earlier partnership deeds. one such partnership is dated 29-9-1990. under the clause (v) of the said partnership, it is stated that the partnership shall be at will. the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the said partnership being a partnership at will under section 43 of the indian partnership act, the same ..... may be dissolved by any partner by giving notice in writing to all the partners of his intention to dissolve the firm. the respondent counsel has brought to my notice, a notice issued by one of the partners dated 5-7-1996 intimating the board that the partnership ..... the firm by that notice w.e.f. 5-7-1996.6. having regard to these circumstances, the legal position would be that the partnership that entered into agreement stood dissolved with effect from 5-7-1996. as i have already noted above, a separate suit is also filed ..... consequence, as long as the petitioner-firm is ready to execute the work, in terms of thecontract of the year 1987 and the said partnership is not dissolved and it is still continuing by reconstitution from time to time. he further urged that at any rate the said contract ..... by the concerned person for rendition of the accounts. in these circumstances, it cannot be said that the partnership that entered into an agreement with the board still existed as on today.7. now the other short point for my consideration would be, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2005 (HC)

Sudex, Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Gift-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (2007)210CTR(AP)529; [2007]290ITR511(AP)

..... transfer much less gift in the said transaction.4. the learned commissioner (cgt) being of the view that under the partnership act, minors cannot be taken as partners, examined the matter in the light of sections 30 and 32 of the indian partnership act, 1932, and held that the case law applicable to the retirement of partners is not applicable to the minor withdrawing from ..... make certain observations on the basis of the well-settled position in law with regard to the partnership firm and the rights of the partners with respect to the assets of the firm.12. it is by now well-settled that the partnership firm under the indian partnership act, 1932, is not a distinct legal entity apart from the partners constituting it. a firm has ..... no separate rights of its own in the partnership assets. in law, any reference to the firm's property or firm's assets is in ..... to partners is not applicable to the case of a minor withdrawing from the benefits of partnership. let us, therefore, consider the correctness of the said conclusions. section 30 of the indian partnership act, 1932, to the extent relevant, is extracted hereunder:30. minors admitted to the benefits of partnership.--(1) a person who is a minor according to the law to which he is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1977 (SC)

Vasantrao Alias Baburao and anr. Vs. Shyamrao and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1977SC2021; [1977]47CompCas666(SC); (1977)4SCC9; [1978]1SCR218; 1977(9)LC499(SC)

..... can only wound up by the court. admittedly this is not a case of volume winding up or winding up subject to the supervision of the chapter vi of the indian partnership act, 1932 also contains persons for the dissolution of a firm and its winding up on dissolution the argument for the appellants is that the special provisions of x of the ..... not relevant for the present purpose. it is clear that provisions for winding up of the affairs of a firm which vi of the indian partnership act contains besides provision-, dissolution of partnership are left untouched by section 59 companies a the cases cited in support of the respective contentions of the parties are not really on the point under consideration except the ..... to entertain some of the claims made in the suit, because section 590 of the companies act makes it clear that part x of the does not affect the operation of the indian partnership act. s 590 states:5. saving and construction of enactments conferring power to w partnership, association or company in certain cases.nothing in this part shall affect the operation of ar ..... . enactment which provides for any partnership, associatic or company being wound up, or being wound up as a cor .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //