Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian partnership act Sorted by: old Year: 1828 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.060 seconds)

1828

Karthaus Vs. Yllas Y Ferrer

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1828

..... in difference of which express notice was given to the arbitrators and that they neglected to determine them. one partner, during the continuance of the partnership, cannot bind the other partner to a submission of the interests of both, to arbitration, but he might bind himself so as to submit ..... page 26 u. s. 229 so in this case, although the submission speaks in general terms of disputes, differences, and controversies with charles w. karthaus, acting for his late house of c. w. karthaus & co. and for himself, it shall not be intended there were any controversies with c. w. ..... hands and seals, in the following words, to-wit: "we, the undersigned, henry child and lewis brantz, as arbitrators, and michael mcblair, as umpire, acting in virtue of the annexed bond, or instrument of writing, do hereby award and adjudge, that the late firm of c. w. karthaus & co. pay ..... condition of the bond, after reciting, that certain disputes, differences, and controversies have arisen, and are still depending between the above bound charles w. karthaus, acting for his late house of charles w. karthaus & co., and for himself and the above named francisco yllas y ferrer and josef antonio yllas, &c.;, ..... it was set forth that "whereas certain disputes, differences, and controversies, have arisen and are still depending between the above bounden charles w. karthaus, acting for the late house of charles w. karthaus & co. and himself, and the above named francisco yllas y ferrer and josef antonio yllas, for the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //