Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian partnership act Sorted by: old Year: 1880 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.056 seconds)

Jun 24 1880 (PC)

In Re: the Indian Companies' Act, 1866 and of the Calcutta Jute Mills ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-24-1880

Reported in : (1880)ILR5Cal888

..... . to give jurisdiction under this section the following conditions must be fulfilled:first, the company must be a company within the meaning of the section. in an indian act, of course, a company means an indian company, unless a contrary intention appears; and it was so held under this section on an appeal in this court--in re agra and masterinan's bank ..... not registered under this act, and hereinafter included under the term unregistered company, may be wound up under this ..... . coy. ex parte moss (19 l.j., ch., 474). lord romilly, m.r., under the present act, wound up a banking company formed and registered in india---re commercial bank of india (l.r., 6 eq., 517). and mr. justice lindley, in his work on partnership, vol. ii. p. 1233, 4th edn., says: 'it seems clear that companies formed here or abroad ..... . that is, the first section of part viii, the title of which is 'application of act to unregistered companies.' the section is, so far as it is material, as follows:subject as hereinafter mentioned, any partnership, association or company, except railway companies incorporated by act of parliament or act of the governor-general of india in council, consisting of more than seven members, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1880 (PC)

Bemola Dossee Vs. Mohun Dossee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-29-1880

Reported in : (1880)ILR5Cal792

..... circumstances.5. ramlochun soor was the father of obhoy churn, sree churn, and gour churn. during his lifetime ramlochum carried on business in calcutta in partnership with a third person, whom and whose representative we shall hereafter refer to as the independent partner. during ramlochun's life the properties to which ..... the same interest with the plaintiff. after the death of obhoy churn and sree churn, gour churn continued to manage the family share in the partnership and the joint family property, and he and his brother's widows continued to live as an undivided family, the profits of the family share ..... purchased in the names of ramlochun and the independent partner. ramlochun died more than fourteen years ago intestate, and his property and his share in the partnership business were inherited by his three sons, who conducted and managed the same. obhoy churn, the plaintiff's husband, died in 1868, intestate and ..... the decision at page 51, appendix i, of the first volume of the bombay high court reports (approved at page 471 of the first volume of indian law reports, calcutta series). in that case the following propositions were stated as law (pages 71 and 72): 'the power of a manager to carry ..... the protection which the hindu law generally extends to the interests of a minor should be so far trenched upon as to bind him by acts of the family manager necessary for the carrying on and consequent preservation of that family property; but that infringement is not to be carried beyond .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //