Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian partnership act Sorted by: old Year: 1891 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.062 seconds)

Feb 02 1891 (FN)

Alexander Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-02-1891

..... a tendency to show an effort on his part to defraud his partner's estate and to make profit out of his death by appropriating to himself the partnership property, it did not necessarily have that tendency, and was clearly a privileged communication. if he consulted him in the capacity of an attorney, and the ..... district of arkansas imposing a sentence of death upon the plaintiff in error for the murder of david c. steadman "at the creek nation in the indian country." page 138 u. s. 354 the plaintiff in error relied upon the following grounds for reversal: 1. that the court erred in its selection of ..... res gestae. at the same time, we recognize a certain discretion on the part of the trial judge to rule out this entire testimony, both of the acts and the declarations of house, if, in his opinion, they were so remote or insignificant as to have no legitimate tendency to show that house could have ..... reason why house had armed himself and, with other parties, was scouring the country for steadman. their statements in that connection would be clearly illustrative of the act in question, and a part of the res gestae, within the rule laid down in lord george gordon's case, 1 greenl.ev. 108, and within ..... justice brown, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court. this was a writ of error sued out under the sixth section of the act of february 6, 1889, 25 stat. 655, 656, c. 113, 6, to review a judgment of the circuit court of the united states for the western .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1891 (FN)

Central Transp. Co. Vs. Pullman's Car Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-02-1891

..... and transfer to them, or any of them," of its "railway cars and other personal property." the plaintiff therefore was not an ordinary manufacturing corporation such as might, like a partnership, or an individual engaged in manufactures, sell or lease all its property to another corporation. ardesco oil co. v. north american oil co., 66 penn.st. 375; treadwell v. ..... the same justice, in delivering the opinion of the court, stated the reasons for the decision as follows: "the rights, duties, and obligations of the defendants are defined in the acts of the legislature of indiana under which they were organized, and reference must be had to these to ascertain the validity of their contracts. they empower the defendants, respectively, to ..... , made, acknowledged, recorded, and filed in the office of the secretary of the commonwealth, as required by the general laws of pennsylvania, which authorized companies to incorporate themselves, by voluntary act of the associates, "for the purpose of carrying on the manufacture of woolen, cotton, flax, or silk goods, or of iron, paper, lumber, or salt," or "for the manufacture ..... of hiring or letting the cars to railroad companies by written contracts, receiving a revenue from the sale of berths and accommodations to passengers. seven years afterwards, by a special act of the legislature of pennsylvania, the charter was extended for ninety-nine years, and the corporation was empowered to double its capital stock, and "to enter into contracts with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 1891 (FN)

Etheridge Vs. Sperry

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-23-1891

..... named douglas, and the first mortgage was for goods bought by that firm, and the second for goods bought by hamilton alone, after he had purchased douglas' interest in the partnership. it is contended that these mortgages should be considered as executed simultaneously, and parts of one transaction, and as equivalent to a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, and ..... suit prosecuted in the state courts to the highest court of such state against a marshal of the united states for trespass, who defends himself on the ground that the acts complained of were performed by him under a writ of attachment from the proper federal court, presents a case for a writ of error to this court when the final .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //