Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Jan-10-2018
..... complainant and his wife in absence of any document /written evidence in terms of section 91 of the evidence act as the complainant had failed to produce proof of any of the partnership deed though as per his own admission, all the original partners were alive and available. the element of ..... learned trial court proceeded to analyze the material evidence on record in order to come to a finding, whether the ingredients of the section 420 of the indian penal code are made out beyond the shadow of the reasonable doubts. the ingredients of section 420 requires: (i) dishonest deception by the accused. ..... in furtherance of their common intention cheated the complainant by forging documents. the learned trial court proceeded to frame the charges u/s 420 of the indian penal code on 02.04.2009 against the sole accused, who pleaded not guilty on being explained. after closure of the prosecution evidence, the statement ..... filed by the petitioner/complainant after holding inquiry under section 202 of the criminal procedure code in terms of section 420/409/467/468/471 of the indian penal code against the accused. the complainant alleged that he along with accused and others were partner of m/s jhanda singh and company ..... in complaint case no. 96/2007 whereunder the sole accused/opposite party no. 2 has been acquitted of the charges under section 420 of the indian penal code is suffering from a delay of 69 days. however, we have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length on the grounds of .....Tag this Judgment!