Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-17-1999
Reported in : ILR1999KAR193; 1999(6)KarLJ517
..... in the case of dry land one hectare and that the total extent of land after such grant does not exceed the ceiling area according to the karnataka land reforms act, 1961'.the petitioner now wants the said land by way of right. rule 4 does not confer on him a right. it gives a discretion to the authorities to grant ..... it will result in a situation where one who gets only a bit of land will become the owner of hundred of acres of land. this is not what the act contemplates. for enjoying a property measuring 2.17 acres, if a property measuring 1 acre 13 guntas is to be given, then there is no meaning for the word 'grant .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-28-1999
Reported in : 98CompCas312(Kar); 1999(6)KarLJ509
order1. this revision by defendant 1 is directed against the judgment and money decree dated 15-4-1995 of the court of the learned civil judge, small causes, koppal, passed in s.c. no. 3 of 1994 decreeing the suit of r-1 (hereinafter referred to as 'the plaintiff-bank') as prayed against petitioner ('d-1' for short) and r-2 ('d-2' for short).2. certain undisputed and admitted facts are as stated under:d-l was an 'a class contractor', who was undertaking contract work of public works department ('p.w.d.' for short) in koppal taluk of raichur district. he had dealings with the plaintiff-bank since 1983. at his request and on his application, the plaintiff-bank had issued ex. p. 1 bank guarantee dated 14-7-1988 for a sum of rs. 28,740.00 in favour of the executive engineer, p.w.d., raichur ('executive engineer' for short) in connection with the execution of certain contract work of the latter that was entrusted to d-l. initially, that bank guarantee was issued for a period of one year commencing from 14-7-1988 which stood extended from time to time at the instance of d-l upto 13-7-1991 as borne out by the deeds of extension of guarantee produced at ex. p. 5 and ex. p. 6. ex. p. 2 counter indemnity bond dated 14-7-1988 was also executed by d-1 in favour of the plaintiff-bank. d-2, as surety for the said bank guarantee facility made available to d-l by the plaintiff-bank, executed 'guarantor's agreement', ex. p. 4 dated 14-7-1988 in its favour.3. when ex. p. 1 bank guarantee was .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-10-1999
Reported in : [2000(84)FLR1014]; ILR2000KAR396; (2000)ILLJ1059Kant
..... leads to violation of principles of natural justice and consequently vitiates the proceedings before the tribunal under sub-section (3) of section 33 of the act and any decision given in these proceedings against the workman concerned.'10. the rationale followed by the apex court in the above decision in respect ..... domestic enquiry such a relief cannot be provided under section 33 of the act. the question is whether on such interpretation the workman could be denied the relief of subsistence allowance in a case where the labour court ..... concerned is not gainfully employed elsewhere, grant interim relief and in doing so, the quantum of subsistence allowance fixed in section 10-a of the act provides the guidelines.'9. thus, it has been held by this court that when a workman is entitled to relief of subsistence allowance pending a ..... pending before the labour court, rama jois, j, as he then was, held:'section 10-a, recently introduced into the industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1946, incorporates a uniform law governing the payment of subsistence allowance to a workman of an industry during the pendency of a domestic inquiry into complaints ..... .6. in order to arrive at an answer to question in issue it becomes necessary to (sic) excerpt section 33(3)(b) of the act to understand the scope and power of the labour court under the said provision. it reads:'33. conditions of service etc., to remain unchanged under .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-17-1999
Reported in : AIR1999SC1044; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)488; 1999CriLJ1623; 1999(1)Crimes104(SC); JT1999(1)SC486; 1999(1)KLT747(SC); 1999(1)SCALE505; (1999)2SCC651; 1SCR696
..... statement, a case was registered as crime no. 5/96 of vanitha police station, ernakulam. the case was registered under sections 366a, 372, 376 and 344 read with section 34 ipc. the police started investigating into the said allegations and in the course of investigation the victim girl was examined on 24.8.96 and on 25.8.96. these respondents ..... wholly unwarranted. it was further urged that the allegations made by the lady not only amounts to commission of offence of rape alone but also the offence under immoral traffic act and the high court never applied its mind to find out whether the allegations taken at their face value would constitute other offences for which the criminal case had been ..... otherwise of the allegations made in the f.i.r. or the complaint and that the extraordinary or inherent powers do not confer an arbitrary jurisdiction on the court to act according to its whim or caprice. it is too well settled that the first information report is only an initiation to move the machinery and to investigate into a cognizable ..... have scuttled investigation by quashing the f.i.r., particularly when the criminal case had been registered under several provisions of the penal code as well as under immoral traffic act. we also do not approve of the uncharitable comments made by the high court in paragraph (12) of the judgment against the woman who had given the f.i.r .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-04-1999
Reported in : AIR1999SC2181; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)874; 89(2000)CLT130(SC); 1999CriLJ3496; 1999(2)CTC263; JT1999(3)SC408; 1999(3)SCALE103; (1999)5SCC238; 2SCR1005; 1999(2)LC831(SC)
..... of the aforesaid legislative mandate, only the offences which are covered by table 1 or 2 as stated above can be compounded and the rest of the offences punishable under indian penal code could not be compounded.6. further, decision in ram pujan's case (supra) does not advance the contention raised by the appellants. in the said case, the court ..... mahesh chand (supra) was rendered perincuriam.5. in our view, submission of the learned counsel for the respondent requires to be accepted. for compounding of the offences punishable under the indian penal code, complete scheme is provided under section 320 of the crpc, 1973. sub-section (1) of section 320 provides that the offences mentioned in the table provided thereunder can ..... month's r.i and fine of rs.1,000 in default of payment of which to undergo r.i for further three months for the offence under section 326 ipc and no separate sentence was imposed on the other counts of offences. against that order, these appeals are filed by special leave.4. it is vehemently contended by the learned .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-16-1999
Reported in : AIR1999SC964; 88(1999)CLT60(SC); JT1999(1)SC509; (1999)IIMLJ121(SC); 1999(1)SCALE471; (1999)2SCC583; 1SCR635
..... persons from among the organisers of these festivals and pujas, formed into the durga puja samithee and registered it as a society on 21.1.1960 under the societies registration act 1860 (act 21 of 1860) with a memorandum of association which included cultural and other activities also besides religious activities. the society then applied to the government of orissa for grant ..... court in khaji mohammed hussain sahib v. masjiday mehmood jamait managing committee, puddupet air 1940 mad 167. a division bench consisting of wadsworth and venkataramana rao, jj. held that the act 21/1860 was passed in 1860 when, according to english law, a gift for the advancement of religion or promotion of religious worship was treated as a charitable purpose and ..... allahabad high court in anjuman islamia of muttra v. nasiruddin ilr (1906) all. 384. it was contended in that case that the registration of a society called 'anjuman islamia' under act 21 of 1860 was not permissible as the society was formed for 'religious purposes only' and not for charitable purposes. the allahabad high court rejected the said contention and held ..... , or the fine arts, or for the diffusion of useful knowledge, the diffusion of political education, or for charitable purposes, it is enacted as follows-again, section 1 of the act 21/1860 reads as follows:section 1--societies formed by memorandum of association and registration--any seven or more persons associated for any literary, scientific, or charitable purpose, or for .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Dec-18-1999
Reported in : 242ITR728(Ker)
..... march 31, 1984, and that of plant and machinery including electrical installations at rs. 13,66,200. the assessee, being a partner in the said partnership firm, the assessing officer computed the value of the assessee's share in the interest of the firm and consequently enhanced the returned figure of wealth ..... a citizen of india, was a resident of kuwait for a long time. he is a partner in haji m. k. abdul khader and co., a partnership firm, which runs a hotel called 'paramount tower' in calicut. the valuation officer determined the fair market value of the hotel building at rs. 86, ..... with two explanations, clarificatory notes on clauses show that under the pre-existing provisions, in the case of an assessee being a permanent person of indian origin or a citizen of india who has returned to india with the intention of permanently residing in india, the moneys and the value of assets ..... such assets shall not be included in the net wealth, of the assessee--. . . .(xxxiii) in the case of an assessee, being a person of indian origin who was ordinarily residing in a foreign country and who, on leaving such country, has returned to india with the intention of permanently residing therein, moneys ..... year 1977-78 and subsequent years.5. the assets, etc., brought into india, by persons of indian origin or by citizens of india--section 5(l)(xxxiii). section 5(l)(xxxiii), newly inserted by the finance act, 1976, with effect from april 1, 1977, grants exemption, for and from the assessment year 1977 .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on : Nov-08-1999
..... by the assessee against the order dt. 8th january, 1999 of cit(a), dehradun, pertains to the asst. yr.1995-96.2. the assessee is partnership firm consisting of boskalis international b.v. (bki) and holland annemingamatt shapig netherland incorporated on 24th november, 1993, in netherlands with limited liability.3. the ..... 271(1)(c) of the act for concealment of income and for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.8. the learned cit(a) disposed ..... s. 49e can be reconciled with ss. 228 and 229 by holding that s. 49e applies when insolvency rules do not apply." 29. in cit vs. indian molasses co. (p) ltd. (1989) 176 itr 473 (cal), it was held that when there is a general enactment as well as a special enactment ..... provision".28. similarly, in meteor satellite ltd. vs. ito (1979) 121 itr 311 (guj), this principle was followed. again, in union of india & anr. vs.indian fisheries (p) ltd. (1965) 57 itr 331 (sc) it was held at p. 334 : "the effect of these statutory provisions is, inter alia, that an unsecured ..... appellant maintained a pe in india in accordance with the provisions of the indian netherlands dtaa. (3) in applying the tax rate applicable to a foreign company to the appellant v.o.f. instead of the tax rate applicable to a partnership firm. (5) in initiating penalty proceedings against the appellant under s. .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-14-1999
Reported in : 1999(2)ALD110; 1999(1)ALT769
..... showing of the complainant himself, the petitioner herein is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence punishable under section 501 1pc as the petitioner is a partner of the partnership firm which runs daily newspaper called as 'deccan chronicle'. the learned counsel mr. mahmood' ali further submitted that the reporter, who wrote the article is primarily responsible for defamation if ..... this court as under: relying upon another ruling reported in state of maharashtra v. r.b. chowdhari, : 1968crilj95 , the learned single judge held that the complaint filed under section 501 ipc is not maintainable against the chairman who was publishing the newspaper.8. the learned counsel further relied upon a ailing reported in udayam telugu daily, 7/1 azamabad industrial area ..... mentioned by us. the law on the subject is absolutely clear and there are a number of decisions of this court which have interpreted the relevant sections of the press act.'7. the learned counsel further relied upon a ruling reported in dasari narayana rao v. r.d. bhagvandas and another, 1986 crl.lj 888, which is a ruling of the ..... code only the reporter, who wrote the article, is responsible whereas vicarious liability is fastened on the editor and the publisher under the press and registration of books act, 1867 (act 25 of 1867). but no penal law holds the owner of the press responsible for an action for defamation and therefore it was submitted by the learned counsel for the .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-04-1999
Reported in : 1999CriLJ1473
..... the complainant himself, the petitioner herein is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence punishable under section 501, i.p.c. as the petitioner is a partner of the partnership firm which runs daily newspaper called as 'deccan chronicle'. the learned counsel mr. mahmood ali further submitted that the reporter, who wrote the article primarily responsible for defamation if any ..... the complainant. the editor, who is supposed to edit the news, can be held responsible and the publisher can also be held responsible in a criminal case for defamation. under indian penal code only the reporter, who wrote the article, is responsible whereas vicarious liability is fastened on the editor and the publisher under the press and registration of books ..... act, 1867 (act 25 of 1867). but no penal laws holds the owner of the press responsible for an action for defamation and therefore it was submitted by the learned counsel for the ..... mentioned by us. the law on the subject is absolutely clear and there are a number of decisions of this court which have interpreted the relevant sections of the press act. 7. the learned counsel further relied upon a ruling reported in dasari narayana rao v. r.d. bhagvandas 1986 cri lj 888, which is a ruling of the learned single .....Tag this Judgment!