Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian partnership act Year: 2013 Page 7 of about 660 results (0.065 seconds)

Oct 09 2013 (HC)

Leading Loans Vs. D.L.Walton

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-09-2013

..... and order of acquittal, which is in favour of a5, challenged in this appeal.2. the case of the appellant/complainant is that, the complainant is a partnership firm dealing with stock and shares of various companies, and a1 is a company engaged in the business of purchase and sale of stock and share of various ..... this the 09th day of october, 2013 judgment the appellant is the complainant in a prosecution for the offence punishable under section 138 of the ni act and section 420 r/w 34 of ipc. the learned magistrate by his judgment dated 19.6.2002 in c.c.no.225 of 1994 has found that out of the eight ..... is correct and legal in his finding that the complainant has failed to prove that a5 has committed the offences punishable under section 138 of the ni act or section 420 r/w 34 of ipc.8. in a recent decision reported in state of rajasthan v. darshan singh @ darshan lal (2012 (4) supreme 72), the apex court ..... the trial court has finally found that the complainant has failed to prove that a5 has committed the offence punishable under section 138 of the ni act or under section 420 r/w 34 of ipc. accordingly, a5 is acquitted for the said offences. while a7 is acquitted for the offence crl.a.no.246 of 2008 :-3-: ..... was sent, the amount was not paid and thus the accused 8 in numbers have committed the offence punishable under section 138 of the ni act and under section 420 r/w 34 of ipc. during the trial of the case pws.1 and 2 were examined and exts.p1 to p14 were marked. during the trial, only .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 2013 (HC)

Bloomberg Finance Lp Vs. Prafull Saklecha and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-11-2013

..... is stated that in india, bloomberg utv was launched in 2008 as a 24-hour english language business and financial broadcast news outlet by utv software communications in strategic partnership with bloomberg television. it is stated that the mark bloomberg is globally recognized and it is exclusively associated and identified with the plaintiff and its products and services. ..... before the 1st additional chief metropolitan magistrate, bangalore, under the provisions of sections 65, 66 and 66-c of the information technology act, 2005 ( it act ) read with section 120(b), 511 and 411 of the indian penal code ( ipc ) alleging stolen information and illegal hacking . in two petitions filed by the plaintiff seeking quashing of the criminal case, the karnataka ..... the defendant no.4, bloomberg realty (india) private limited, was carrying on business from indore, madhya pradesh; that defendant nos. 1 and 2 had formed the other indian bloomberg companies and had changed the name of another company, smart developers private limited, to bloomberg developers private limited. the plaintiff states that all the above steps were taken ..... private limited, defendant no.4 is bloomberg realty (india) private limited and defendant no.5 is bloomberg entertainment private limited. defendant nos. 6 to 23 are other indian companies whose names incorporate bloomberg as a prominent feature of the corporate name. defendant no.24 is bloomberg airways private limited and defendant no.25 is bloomberg green ventures .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2013 (SC)

Balmer Lawrie and Co. Ltd. and Others Vs. Partha Sarathi Sen Roy and O ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-20-2013

..... constitution), and is thus, amenable to writ jurisdiction.2. facts and circumstances giving rise to these appeals are:a. the appellant is a public limited company incorporated under the indian companies act, 1956. the shares of the appellant company were originally held by indo-burma petroleum co. ltd., life insurance corporation, unit trust of india, general insurance corporation and its ..... the ministry of petroleum and natural gas. the ministry of petroleum and natural gas exercises administrative control over the appellant company. the appellant company started its business as a partnership firm in 1867 and subsequently, the same was converted into a private limited company in 1924, and then eventually, into a public limited company in 1936.its past ..... age of equity holdingbalmerlawrie investment ltd.61.80%mutual fund and uti5.08%financial institutions and banks12.85%foreign national2.97%up state government0.05%private/corporate bodies6.14%indian public11.10%directors and their relatives0.01%23. there is nothing on record to show that the central government provides any financial or budgetary support to the appellant ..... ibp company limited, had a common chairman. the remuneration structure of the employees of the appellant company, is also in conformity with those which are applicable to the indian oil corporation and ibp, as has been fixed by the bureau of public enterprises, government of india. the reservation policy as enshrined in the directive principles of the constitution .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. K S Nalwa Advocate Vs. Amit Paul and Others ........ Peti ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-22-2013

..... (o&m) 2 that m/s alchem international limited (respondent herein) filed a complaint on the allegations that m/s g k enterprises, a partnership concern of amit paul and sumitra paul was appointed as super stockiest by the complainant company, vide agreement dated 14.09.2006. the complainant company supplied ..... s g.k.enterprises and others (annexure p11) under section 138 read with section 142 of the negotiable instruments act, 1881 (for short, the act ) read with section 420 of indian penal code (for short, ipc ) and summoning order dated 29.08.2009 (annexure p12).passed by the judicial magistrate ist class, faridabad and ..... . this apart, the need to hold an inquiry envisaged under section 202 of the code in a case under section 138 of the 1881 act, has been dealt in goenka tradelinks pvt.limited and apex health care private limited and others (supra).wherein, after reference to the decision of ..... of action to file a complaint, the court at faridabad does not have jurisdiction to entertain and try the offence under section 138 of the act. another submission made by counsel is that the judicial magistrate faridabad, did not conduct an inquiry in compliance with the provisions of section 202 ..... of the courts exercising jurisdiction in one of the five local areas can become the place of trial for the offence under section 138 of the act. however, hon ble the supreme court, in a later judgment in harman electronics private limited and another v. national panasonic india private limited, ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2013 (HC)

Babita Pathak and Others Vs. High Court of Delhi and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-22-2013

..... , flair in english, knowledge of objective type legal problems and their solutions covering constitution of india, code of civil procedure, code of criminal procedure, indian penal code, contract act, partnership act, principles governing arbitration law, evidence act, specific relief act and limitation act will be included. minimum qualifying marks in the preliminary examination shall be 60% for general and 55% for reserved categories i.e. ..... (dead) through lrs & others:2010. (1) scc 756.16. in national federation of blind (supra), a division bench of this court held as under:16. the disabilities act was enacted for protection of the rights of the disabled in various spheres like education, training, employment and to remove any discrimination against them in the sharing of development benefits ..... disabilities as also to ensure equal opportunities and protection of the rights of full participation of such persons. that being the case, it was submitted that the said act ought to be given a liberal, purposive and constructive interpretation in favour of the persons with disabilities. for this proposition, he placed reliance on bata india ltd v ..... up by the candidates of general category which would include the petitioners.11. mr datar, appearing on behalf of the high court of delhi, submitted that the said act being a beneficial / welfare legislation enacted to benefit the persons with disabilities had been enacted with the object and purpose of giving effect to the proclamation on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2013 (HC)

Deepti Vs. High Court of Delhi and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-22-2013

..... , flair in english, knowledge of objective type legal problems and their solutions covering constitution of india, code of civil procedure, code of criminal procedure, indian penal code, contract act, partnership act, principles governing arbitration law, evidence act, specific relief act and limitation act will be included. minimum qualifying marks in the preliminary examination shall be 60% for general and 55% for reserved categories i.e. ..... (dead) through lrs & others:2010. (1) scc 756.16. in national federation of blind (supra), a division bench of this court held as under:16. the disabilities act was enacted for protection of the rights of the disabled in various spheres like education, training, employment and to remove any discrimination against them in the sharing of development benefits ..... disabilities as also to ensure equal opportunities and protection of the rights of full participation of such persons. that being the case, it was submitted that the said act ought to be given a liberal, purposive and constructive interpretation in favour of the persons with disabilities. for this proposition, he placed reliance on bata india ltd v ..... up by the candidates of general category which would include the petitioners.11. mr datar, appearing on behalf of the high court of delhi, submitted that the said act being a beneficial / welfare legislation enacted to benefit the persons with disabilities had been enacted with the object and purpose of giving effect to the proclamation on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (TRI)

Gopinath Nagar ?a? Co-op. Hsg. Society Ltd. Vs. M/S. Nandan Builders a ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : Sep-25-2013

k.s. chaudhari, presiding member this revision petition has been filed by the petitioner/complainant against the order dated 28.07.2011 passed by the maharashtra state consumer disputes redressal commission, mumbai, (in short, the state commission) in appeal no. a/11/574 gopinath nagar vs. m/s. nandan builders and ors. by which, appeal filed by the complainant was dismissed at admission stage. 2. brief facts of the case are that complainant/petitioner filed complaint before district forum and prayed for direction to the op/respondent to execute deed of convenience in favour of the complainant no.1/society and further direction to ops to complete the incomplete work and further prayed for compensation along with interest. learned district forum partly allowed the complaint and directed op to execute conveyance deed, but did not grant other reliefs against which, appeal filed by the complainant/petitioner was not admitted against which, this revision petition has been filed along with application for condonation of delay. 3. heard learned counsel for the petitioner at admission stage and perused record. 4. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on account of financial crunch, revision petition could not be filed in time; hence, delay in filing revision petition be condoned. 5. in the application for condonation of delay, period of delay to be condoned has not been mentioned, but as per office report, there is delay of 372 days in filing revision petition. paragraph .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2013 (TRI)

M/S. Haldiram (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. the Registrar of Trade ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on : Apr-26-2013

..... to the linkage between the two companies. mr.prabhu shankar in the civil suit before the city civil court has stated that haldiram bhujiawala is a partnership firm. therefore, the invoices cannot be said to relate to the use of the registered joint proprietors. during the course of the arguments, the ..... user prior in point of time than the impugned user. (k)narayanappa v. krishtappa [(1966) 3 scr 400] ?? right of a partner in a partnership continues till the date of dissolution. on dissolution, whatever right the partner will have will be as on the date of dissolution and not afterwards. (l ..... bhujiawala/ haldiram bhujiawala ?? hrd logo in v-shape device. 8. in november, 1974, the partnership firm between mr.ganga bishan, mr.moolchand, mr.shiv kishan and mrs.kamala devi was dissolved. on dissolution, mr.moolchand acquired the exclusive right to use the ..... in kolkata. 7. the trademark haldiram bhujiawala as well as the ??v shape hrb logo was continuously used by mr.ganga bishan and then by the partnership firm haldiram bhujiawala also trading as m/s.chandmal ganga bishan since 1941. therefore, the firm is the prior adopter and user of the trademark haldiram ..... an instrument of fraud. (g)a.v.papayya sastry v. govt. of a.p.[(2007) 4 scc 221] ?? fraud - vitiates all judicial acts whether in rem or in personam. (h)indian bank v. m/s.satyam fibres (india) pvt. ltd. [air 1996 sc 2592] ?? the courts have inherent powers to set aside any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 2013 (HC)

Dharmendra Bhura Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

..... no.20325/08 whereby in a private complaint filed by him against the respondents for his prosecution of the offence punishable under section 420 of ipc, his documents i.e. the alleged partnership deed and the agreement for partnership in the lack of proper stamp duty, on the same were held to be inadmissible documents with some direction to impound and get validated ..... .9.2010, (ann. r-1) was also passed in this regard, according to which it was held that the aforesaid agreement for partnership and deed of partnership, (annexure p-2) being not properly stamped in accordance with the stamp act, are not admissible documents and such order was never challenged by the applicant herein before any of the superior court and the same ..... orders alongwith the order dated 27.9.2010.5. it is undisputed on record that the aforesaid agreement of partnership and deed of partnership, (annexure p-2, collectively) were not made and prepared on a requisite stamp duty as per requirement of stamp act and its schedule. i am of the considered view that in the civil matters or matters relating to the ..... instrument chargeable with duty shall be admitted in evidence for any purpose by any person having by law or consent of parties authority to receive evidence, or 6 shall be acted upon, registered or authenticated by any such person or by any public officer unless such instrument is duly stamped :- provided that- (a) .. (b)..................... (c)..................... (d) nothing herein contained shall prevent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Hemant Bassi Standing Counsel for Vs. Hemant Gautam and A ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-11-2013

..... case was registered. during the investigation, statements of devinder singh and charan singh were recorded, who had alleged that jaspreet kaur after entering into partnership with hemant gautam developed bad habits and had left her matrimonial home and though she was told to mend her ways, she did not agree. ..... deceased. statement of devinder singh, pw-4 is, however, exhaustive. he has stated that in july 2004 jaspreet kaur entered into a partnership with hemant gautam and a partnership deed was executed between them. according to him, after that relations between kuldeep singh and jaspreet kaur started deteriorating. he has stated ..... in this case. section 306 ipc requires some positive act on the part of the accused of having abetted suicide by the deceased. there is no such positive act in this case. it is a case where the wife for some reasons took up business in partnership with hemant gautam and despite the ..... her belongings. these things might have left the deceased depressed. however, this would not bring the case within the four corners of section 107 ipc, which defines abetment. in similar situation where the husband contracted a second marriage against the will of his firs.wife and his firs.wife ..... where he was found hanging to a ceiling fan on 02.06.2005. to prove the charge framed under section 306 read with section 34 ipc, the prosecution had examined nine witnesses. thereafter, accused were examined as provided under section 313 cr.p.c.wherein they have admitted that they .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //