Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian partnership act Year: 2017 Page 7 of about 179 results (0.060 seconds)

Nov 18 2017 (HC)

Pande Ratneshwari Prasad Vs. State Through Superintendent of Police Ce ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-18-2017

..... title deeds in the presence of the branch manager/divisional manager and two other employees of the bank. (b) where the property belongs to a partnership firm, all the partners must call at the branch for the purpose. however, if any one or more of the partners cannot call at the ..... upon to do so. it requires to be stamped under article 6 of schedule 1 of the indian stamp 5 act or the corresponding article of the state stamp (amendment) act, and must be registered under the indian registration act. iv. 3.4.6 while creating an equitable mortgage by deposit of title deeds, the following ..... tiwari, learned special judge, cbi cases, ranchi, on 17.05.2016 has taken cognizance of the offence under the aforesaid sections of the ipc and p.c. act.7. on the other hand, learned counsel for the cbi appeared in this case and he has filed counter-affidavit and during course of arguments ..... above panel advocates including the petitioner. on the basis of the aforesaid allegations, the instant fir has been lodged under the aforesaid sections of the indian penal code.4. counsel for the petitioner while pressing bail application, submitted that the only allegation levelled as against the petitioner is that he has ..... fir no.rc0932014s0012 (dated 28.07.2014) of cbi, eow, ranchi, initially registered under sections 120b read with sections 420, 468 and 471 of the indian penal code lodged on the basis of one complaint filed by shri neeraj raja singh, chief manager, state bank of india, sme branch, city centre, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2017 (HC)

Pande Ratneshwari Prasad Vs. State Through Cbi

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-18-2017

..... deeds in the presence of 5 the branch manager/divisional manager and two other employees of the bank. (ii) where the property belongs to a partnership firm, all the partners must call at the branch for the purpose. however, if any one or more of the partners cannot call at the ..... called upon to do so. it requires to be stamped under article 6 of schedule 1 of the indian stamp act or the corresponding article of the state stamp (amendment) act, and must be registered under the indian registration act. iv. 3.4.6 while creating an equitable mortgage by deposit of title deeds, the following ..... k. tiwari, learned special judge, cbi cases, ranchi, on 17.05.2016 has taken cognizance of the offence under the aforesaid sections of the ipc and p.c. act.7. he submits that as the trial will take some time, the petitioner be enlarged on anticipatory bail.8. on the other hand, learned ..... above panel advocates including the petitioner. on the basis of the aforesaid allegations, the instant fir has been lodged under the aforesaid sections of the indian penal code. 3 4. counsel for the petitioner while pressing bail application, submitted that the only allegation levelled as against the petitioner is that he ..... fir no.rc0932014s0011 (dated 28.07.2014) of cbi, eow, ranchi, initially registered under sections 120b read with sections 420, 468 and 471 of the indian penal code lodged on the basis of one complaint filed by neeraj raja singh, chief manager, state bank of india, sme branch, city centre, sector-iv .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2017 (HC)

Sushil Arora vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-08-2017

..... even know the number of the premises where he was carrying on his business in deputy ganj; the date, month or year of its partnership; the mobile number of his partner or his wife; the real or complete names of the nephew i.e. son of his sister who ..... act 120b ipc ipc rajesh pandey sections 302/307/120b/34 ipc & sections arms act sections 302/307/34/ 120b ipc sectionsr/w 34 ipc hemant garg sections 302/307/120b/34 ipc & sections arms act sections 302/307/34/ 120b ipc sectionsr/w 34 ipc vishnu sections 302/307/120b/34 ipc & sections arms act sections 302/307/34/ 120b ipc and sections 27 arms act sectionsr/w 34 ipc ..... not know the driving and therefore he has obtained the necessary information through rti and the same is required to be proved as per indian evidence act for the just and proper adjudication of the present case. iii. clerk/record keeper from the office of d.c.p., new ..... court has dealt with the aspect of admissibility in evidence of conduct of the accused under section 8 as well as section 27 of the indian evidence act and considered the distinction between the two in para 12, which reads thus : 12. sarkar on law of evidence, 16th edition, 2007 ..... sonveer sections 302/307/120b/34 ipc & sections arms act sections 302/307/34/ 120b ipc and sections 27 arms act sectionsr/w 34 ipc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2017 (HC)

Deepali Designs & Exhibits Private Ltd vs.pico Deepali Overlays Conso ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-18-2017

..... herein. it is the case of the plaintiff that defendant no.1 was not incorporated as a company but was in the nature of an unregistered partnership firm with plaintiff, defendant no.2 and defendant no.3 as its partner for sharing the profit and loss in the ratio as mentioned above. ..... incorporated under the laws of hong kong having its registered office at hong kong whereas the defendant no.3 is a company incorporated under provisions of the indian companies act, 1956 and is a subsidiary of pico india exhibits contractor pvt. ltd. (in short piec ) which is a singapore based company.5. a consortium ..... is inadmissible in evidence in view of the bar under section 23 of the indian evidence act, 1826.15. in the above noted application, in paras 13 and 14 the plaintiff/applicant has relied upon the email dated 10th march, 2011 ..... for the reason that it is a correspondence exchanged by the parties during settlement and is a confidential document thus barred by section 23 of the indian evidence act, 1826.14. thus sending of the email dated 10th march, 2011, has not been denied and only a plea has been taken that it ..... defendant nos. 1 to 3 are jointly and severely liable to rendition of accounts, mandatory injunction and recovery.3. plaintiff is a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 having its registered office at 9, 1st floor, printing press area, wazirpur, delhi. defendant no.1 pico deepali overlays consortium (in short pdoc ) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2017 (HC)

Gmr Energy Limited vs.doosan Power Systems India Private Limited & Or ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-14-2017

..... in harold holdsworth & co. (wakefield) ltd. v. caddies [(1955) 1 all er725. so here. this group is virtually the same as a partnership in which all the three companies are partners. they should not be treated separately so as to be defeated on a technical point. they should not be ..... the appellant as disclosed from the plaint is that article x section 10.2 is inconsistent with some provisions of the indian contract act, 1872, and hit by section 23 of the indian contract act (as being contrary to public policy). it is a submission regarding the legality of the substantive contract. even if ..... the remedy available to them under the ordinary law of india should be held to be opposed to public policy. under section 23 of the indian contract act the consideration or object of an agreement is unlawful if it is opposed to public policy. section 28 and exception 1 to it, ( ..... the impugned conduct, the involvement of the element of the public interest, the effect on parties who may be affected. after referring to several english and indian cases, this court observed that ever since a. salomon & co. ltd. case [1897 ac22 a company has a legal independent existence distinct from individual ..... gmr energy submits that the three epc agreements and the corporate guarantee agreement before this court all prescribe; (1) the law governing the contract shall be indian law (2) the arbitration shall be conducted in singapore and (3) that the arbitration shall be as per siac rules . since the relationship between .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2017 (SC)

Formula One World Championship Ltd Vs. Commissioer of Income Tax, Inte ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-24-2017

..... the bundesfinanzhof held that a uk hotel management company had a pe in germany when it entered into a 20 year contract with a limited partnership which owned a hotel. the agreement required the uk company to supply a general manager: the general manager s office constituted the pe ..... the argument of the revenue holding that the consideration received by fowc amounted to royalty and was to be, accordingly, taxed under the indian income act. however, this view is reversed by the high court by the impugned judgment after detailed discussion on this issue and in the opinion ..... or receivable by fowc from jaypee outside india was subject to tax at source under section 195 of the indian income tax act, 1961 (hereinafter after referred to as the 'act'). aar answered the first question holding that the consideration paid or payable by jaypee to fowc amounted to royalty ..... conduit for south asia and south africa. in recent years, india has been the beneficiary of significant foreign funds through the mauritius conduit . although indian economic reforms since 1991 permitted such capital transfers, the amount would have been much lower without the india-mauritius tax treaty 135. overall, countries ..... type and extent of control necessary for the specific business activity which the taxpayer wants to exercise in the source state, the canadian and indian decisions advocate for stricter standards for the control threshold. the oecd mc shows a paramount tendency (though no strict rule) that pes should .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 2017 (SC)

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-15-2017

..... /xiv 331 50, whereas the governor uttar pradesh, is of the opinion that the making of enquiry and record contemplated under sub section(3) of section 29 of the indian forest act 1927(act no.xvi of 027), will occupy such length of time as in the meantime to endanger the rights of the state government, now therefore, in exercise of the powers ..... transit fee for boulders, sand and bajri, further not to enforce 1978 rules as amended by the state of u.p. vide amendment rules 2004. 14. writ petitioner, a registered partnership firm was engaged in the business of purchase & sale of natural stones, boulders, sand & bajri and supplying the same to the various government departments including pwd. writ petitioner purchased boulders ..... . transit (forest produce) rules, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'rules, 2000'). writ petitioners have also prayed for declaring section 2 (4)(b)(iv) and section 41 of indian forest act, 1927(hereinafter referred to as 'act, 1927') as unconstitutional and ultra vires to the extent they relate to minerals. rule 5 of rules, 2000 as well as notification dated 28.05.2001 was ..... public 19 limited co./private lt. co./proprietor firm manufacturers and traders of goods made of forest produce, the miners, as transporters of forest produce who challenged the applicability of indian forest act, 1927 on mines and minerals and other forest produce. the validity of fourth and fifth amendment rules by which transit fee was increased was also challenged. both the above .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2017 (HC)

M/S. Dimpi S. Creations & Ors. Vs.bank of Baroda

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-03-2017

..... dated 15.09.2014 passed by debts recovery appellate tribunal (hereinafter referred to as drat?).2.... petitioner no.1 m/s. dimpy creations is a partnership concern of petitioner no.2 and petitioner no.3. the petitioners are said to have had dealings with benaras state bank limited. the said bank ..... petitioners as it is the case of the petitioners that they have delivered these bills to the respondent. in view of section 106 of the indian evidence act, being a fact especially within the knowledge of the petitioners, the burden of proving that fact was on the petitioners. it also noted that ..... those facts to exist. similarly, under section 106 of the indian evidence act when any fact is especially within the knowledge of any person the burden of proving such fact is upon him. merely claiming that on account ..... bills were drawn, their amounts or dates, etc. or any details are forthcoming. only bald averments are made.22. under section 101 of the indian evidence act, whoever desires any court to give a judgment as to any legal right or liability depending on existence of facts which he asserts, must prove ..... to the petitioners.6. the petitioners moved an application before drt under section 22 of the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act, 1993 seeking the relief that the respondent be directed to produce the record of the foreign bills submitted by the petitioners to benaras state bank .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 2017 (HC)

National Marble & Sanitary Store v.v. Vs.m/s. Shalimar Paints Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-25-2017

..... (cid:173)1 in his testimony has relied upon the documents i.e., copy of form a and b issued by registrar of firms and societies and partnership deeds dated 25/04/2006 and 21/12/2006 ex. pw(cid:173)1/1(colly.), statements of account issued by canara bank and punjab national bank ..... plaintiff has made the excess payment to the defendant and plaintiff is entitled to recover the excess amount from the defendant. according to section 101 of the indian evidence act, whoever desires any court to give judgment as to any legal right or liability dependent on the existence of the facts, which he asserts, must prove ..... by any law that the proof of that fact shall lie on any particular person. according to section 72 of the indian contract act, 1872, a person to whom money has been paid or anything delivered, by mistake or under coercion, must repay or return it. for the purpose of ..... according to section 103 of the indian evidence act, the burden of proof as to any particular fact lies on that person who wishes the court to believe in its existence, unless it is provided ..... that those facts exist and the burden of proof lies on that person. according to section 102 of the indian evidence act, the burden of proof in a suit or proceedings lies on that person, who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2017 (HC)

Gmr Sports Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Excise, Entt and Luxury Tax an ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-22-2017

..... of, the management thereof; (iv) having licence to provide direct-to-home (dth) service, by the central government under section 4 of the indian telegraph act, 1885 (13 of 1885), and the indian wireless telegraphy act, 1933 (17 of 1933) and also include service provider of cable television signals and value added services, registered or licensed under the cable television ..... bodies, forecasting and development of new trends and setting industry standards and norms). by providing a platform to up and coming fashion designers, fdci assists the promotion of indian fashion worldwide and promotes fashion trade in the domestic and international markets.3. further to its objectives, fdci, as a trade promotion council organises fashion weeks or fashion ..... india (hereafter fdci ) is a registered society created for the purpose w.p.(c)2563/2013 and connected matters page 4 of 143 of promoting and developing the indian fashion industry especially in the areas of manufacturing, design, marketing and distribution. for these underlying purposes, fdci, a non-profit organization, also receives support through grants from ..... are potential domestic and international buyers and the media who are given invitations solely for promoting and marketing indian fashion who do not buy tickets for admission. however, as organizing such events require funds, the petitioner enters into sponsorship/ partnership agreements with various parties. the amounts received are then disbursed for organizing the events and w.p.( .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //