Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka value added tax act section 15 Page 7 of about 92,703 results (1.932 seconds)

Feb 17 1989 (HC)

Basava Reddy D. Sunkapur Vs. Shri Jagadguru Murugarajendra Vidhyapeeth

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1989KAR1668; 1989(3)KarLJ59

..... and that it had claimed a declaration and, therefore, the plaintiff is bound to pay court fee under section 24(a) & (b) of the karnataka court fees and suits valuation act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), these are the only averments to be found in the written statement filed by defendant-1.4. it ..... want of jurisdiction whether pecuniary or territorial. by disposing of the objection raised by the court-fee examiner by adopting the procedure prescribed under section 17 of the act, the court would be discharging its duty and function only in regard to the objection raised by the court-fee examiner, but it certainly ..... by courts, on questions relating to valuation of subject-matter and sufficiency of fee in respect of proceedings in such courts. according to section 17(2) of the act, on an objection being raised by the court-fee examiner in the report submitted by him in relation to any suit or appeal or ..... the defendant before the trial-court had filed a written statement in the suit urging that the subject-matter of the suit had not been properly valued for the purpose of jurisdiction and court-fee and thereafter an issue was cast in that behalf. the petitioner filed i.a-vii asking the ..... trial-court to hear all questions arising on such pleas and render decision before evidence is recorded affecting the defendant on the merits of the claim.15. it is in the above context that this court held:'when the special statute has made it incumbent on the trial court to decide such a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1999 (HC)

M/S. Kabini Papers Limited (In Liquidation), Bangalore Vs. M.D. Shivan ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1999]98CompCas675(Kar); 1999(3)KarLJ378

..... misfeasance proceedings against the directors of a limited company that is in liquidation.2. the case involves an interesting issues concerning the interpretation of two of the sections of the companies act, viz., section 458a and section 543(2); both of which revolve around the question as to what precisely is the period of limitation within which the official liquidator is permitted to ..... this ground alone.5. on behalf of the official liquidator, an entirely different argument has been presented. it is contended that there is a general provision in the companies act viz., section 458a which prescribes that the whole of the period consumed in the winding up of proceedings, plus a period of one year shall be excluded while computing limitation. according ..... official liquidator was appointed as liquidator. having regard to the provisions of [section 449] of the companies act, these two dates coincide. the only question is as to whether the one year exclusion period provided under section 448-a is required to be added on to the five year period prescribed under section 543(2). in my considered view, there is absolutely no warrant for ..... the period of one year ten months by reading two sections in conjunction, then the present application would be within time and would still be maintainable.6. in response to the further submission, the respondent's learned counsel have relied on a full bench decision of this court in m/s. karnataka steel and wire products limited (in liquidation) v m/ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 1994 (HC)

C. Muniyappa Vs. Assistant Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1994KAR3652; 1994(5)KarLJ169

bharuka, j1. the petitioner assails the order dated 15.4.1993 passed by the first respondent-assistant commissioner in r.a.no.101/1989-90 ,(annexure-l) on the ground that on the facts, the appeal was not maintainable under the provisions of section 136(2) of the karnataka revenue act, 1964 (for short, the act).2. the foundational facts leading to the controversy may ..... appeal preferred against annexure-k was very much maintainable before the assistant commissioner because section 136(2) of the act on its very language permits preferring of an appeal against certification of entries under section 129(6) of the act. .4. chapter xi of the act read with chapter ix of the karnataka land revenue rules, 1966 deals with the record of rights. under the ..... scheme of the act, any information received by the prescribed authorities either from the persons interested or the statutory ..... authorities as envisaged under section 128 of the act, with regard to the acquisition of any .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 25 1998 (HC)

Muneer Ahmed Vs. V.K. Babu and Another

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1998(4)KarLJ485

..... deposit of rent by tenant where the landlord refused to accept any rent lawfully paid. there is no such provision in the karnataka act. section 19 of the karnataka act, specifies only two circumstances in which rent can be permitted to be deposited and no other.6. the case of the petitioner does not ..... regularly paid to the credit of the landlord. if the landlord refuses under these circumstances, then the court deposit will be the remedy'.4. section 19 of the act provides that where the address of the landlord or his authorised agent is not known to the tenant or where the landlord refuses to accept the ..... by the tenant in paying the rent, such tender will not be sufficient for making an order under section 19 of the act. either of the two requirements mentioned in section 19 should be fulfilled before an application under section 19 can be allowed. the first is where the tenant pleads that he does not know the ..... order1. the petitioner who is a tenant filed an application under section 19 of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 ('act' for short) in hrc no. 243 of 1987 on the file of the additional judge, court of small causes, bangalore, seeking permission to deposit ..... fulfil either of the two conditions. hence even if petitioner had tendered the rent by banker's cheque that will not entitle him to file a petition under section 19 of the act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 1998 (HC)

M/S. Vyalikaval House Building Co-operative Society, Bangalore Vs. Smt ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(4)KarLJ143

..... this court considered the report of the joint registrar of co-operative societies in the case of narayana reddy and another v state of karnataka and others. afterconsideration of the aforesaid report and various decisions with reference to each of the case, this court concluded in that case as ..... and to the knowledge of the petitioners no awards have been passed and the petitioners or the predecessors in title have received sections 9 and 10 notices nor section 12 notices with regard to acquisition of their lands. the petitioners were served with a notice issued by the city civil court ..... relevant facts. the irresistable inference flowing from the facts and circumstances of these cases is, whereas the power conferred under the land acquisition act is for acquiring lands for carrying out housing scheme by a housing society, in each of the cases the acquisition of lands is not ..... the expense of the writ petitioners and others similarly situated. the lands, the subject-matter of the present litigation, had been acquired under the act vide final notification issued on 21st of february, 1986. such an acquisition was challenged in various writ petitions including w.p. nos. 17775 and ..... . 8194 of 1987.the writ petitioner in that case had challenged the acquisition made by the state government under the land acquisition act, 1894 (for short the 'act') insofar as it related to her property. similarly, in other writ petitions the respondents herein had challenged the acquisition with respect to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 2002 (HC)

Subashchand JaIn Vs. Ganapathi and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2003ACJ1005; ILR2002KAR3355; 2002(4)KarLJ433

..... it requires enhancement.7. per contra sri hegde mulkhand, learned counsel for the insurance company submits that the tribunal has awarded a sum of rs. 47,000/-towards injuries and adding a further sum of rs. 20,000/- for pain and sufferings and on this count itself the tribunal has awarded a sum of rs. 67,000/- and as such no ..... nature of injuries sustained by the claimant, the period of hospitalisation, medical expenses incurred etc., awarded compensation as under:towards injuries ... ... rs. 47,000/-(comprising of rs. 15,000/- for fracture of femur, rs. 15,000-for fracture of mandible, rs. 7,000/- for fracture of nasal bone, rs. 7,000/- for fracture of noso eluamoidal and rs. 3,000/- for two .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 13 2008 (HC)

Shivanna Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009CriLJ215; 2008(5)KarLJ551

..... that arises for our consideration is:whether there is any illegality in the judgment and order of the trial court in convicting the accused for the offence under sections 498-a, 307 and 302 of the ipc?5. it is the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that except the interested version of ..... led any defence evidence. the trial court on appreciation of the material on record convicted the appellant for the offence under sections 498-a, 307 and 302 of the ipc and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and also further sentenced for other offences and ordered to pay the ..... and the deceased submitted his written complaint (ex. p. 12). as mahadeva was dead by that time p.w. 15 returned to the police station and registered crime no. 108 of 2000 for the offence under sections 498-a, 302 and 307 of the indian penal code, 1860 and sent the complaint (ex. p. 12) and ..... on 4-6-2000 he arrested the accused and as his clothes were blood-stained, he seized the clothes (m.os 8 and 9) under mahazar (ex. p. 15). on interrogation, the accused volunteered to produce the weapon. he recorded the statement of the accused (ex. p. 16) who led the police and the attesting witnesses ..... the accused.during the trial, the prosecution led the evidence by examining p.ws. 1 to 15 and got marked exs. p. 1 to 16 and m.os. 1 to 9. the statement of the accused was recorded under section 313 of the criminal procedure code, 1973. he has taken defence of total denial and has not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 1953 (HC)

Papiahachary Vs. Gurusamappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1954Kant149; AIR1954Mys149; (1955)33MysLJ58

..... the plaintiff in o. s. no. 224 of 43-44 and that payment must be deemed to be the payment on behalf of the judgment-debtor for purposes of section 20, limitation act. in the first place this point has not been relied upon in the execution application and in the second place it cannot be said under any circumstances that the ..... as an application for a revival of the previous execution case dismissed for statistical purposes and not as a fresh execution application for purposes of articles 181 and 182, limitation act. we need refer only to -- 'venkate gowda v. mudli setty', 19 mys lj 82 (a) and the case law referred to in it.3. it is contended that since execution .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 1955 (HC)

Bangalore City Municipality Vs. Managing Agents, N. Sirur and Co. Ltd. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1955Kant147; AIR1955Mys147

..... page 245 quotes from a decision the passage: 'every bye-law is a law, and is obligatory to all persons bound by it, that is within its jurisdiction as any act of parliament, only with this difference, that a bye-law is liable to have its validity brought in question'. in -- 'white v. morley', (1899) 2 qb 34 (a) at p ..... not be repugnant to the law and the bye-law should not be repugnant to the rule or the law. the rule cannot be attacked as being repugnant to the act or as being in excess of the power of the government to make it but the bye-law provides for what is beyond the limits laid down by the rule ..... for any purpose' in the bye-law after the word 'power' is not found in the rule. it was notified in ex. a dated 15-1-1940 that the bye-laws would come into force from 15-2-1940. long prior to this date, the defendants started the mills; and had electric installation provided for working the mills. the question therefore is ..... 'instal' anything means establishing it and has reference to the stage or times when it comes into existence, to the initial act and not continuance of what is done previously. the same word in a similar provision of the madras municipalities act has been interpreted to relate to what is done at the inception. see -- 'muthu balu chettiar v. chairman madura municipality .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 1959 (HC)

Rudrappa Fakirappa Sankannavar Vs. Mallangouda and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1960Kant227; AIR1960Mys227; ILR1960KAR336

..... at any rate it became an excess payment on that day and the suit having been instituted on 16-2-1950 the same is within time. article 82 of the 'act' reads as follows:'by a surety against a co-surety three years. when the surety pays anything in excess of his own share.' according to sri malimath, the payment made ..... . the present suit was filed on 16-2-1950.(3) the courts below have held that the suit is barred by limitation. they have held that article 82 of the 'act' governs the facts of the case. this conclusion is not open to challenge. but the point in controversy is, whether the cause of action arose on 22-11-1946 when ..... (1) the scope of article 82 of the indian limitation act (which shall be hereinafter called the 'act') comes up for consideration in this appeal.(2) the facts proved are: the second defendant borrowed in 1926 a sum of rs. 2,000/- from the gajanan urban co-operative .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //