Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1977 Page 1 of about 15 results (0.192 seconds)

Apr 22 1977 (HC)

Sri Brindavan Hotel, Hyderabad Vs. the Conciliation Officer, Hyderabad ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-22-1977

Reported in : AIR1977AP386; [1977(35)FLR381]; (1978)IILLJ287AP

..... the other hand it is the duty of the conciliation officer to hold conciliation proceedings. sub-section (4) and (5) of section 12 provide that the conciliation officer after having mediated in the dispute between an employer and his workmen shall, in case of failure of conciliation proceedings, submit a report to the appropriate government and that, if the appropriate government ..... or terms of employment or with the conditions of labour. when such a dispute arises the conciliation officer appointed under section 4 of the industrial disputes act has duty to mediate in and promote the settlement of industrial dispute. if he fails in his efforts, resort can be had to section 10 for having reference made by the appropriate government of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 1977 (HC)

Avvaru Burraiah Choultry Vs. the Assistant Collector, Tenali and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-18-1977

Reported in : AIR1978AP313

..... year. they paid the makta for the year 1969-70 and 1970-71 and obtained receipts from the petitioner, but failed to pay in spite of demands personally and through mediators for the years 1971-72 and became defaulters. 10. the petition was resisted by respondents 3 and 4 stating among other things that the annual makta for the schedule lands ..... them to cultivate the schedule lands on the same terms and conditions as before. the petitioner demanded forty bags of maktha for the entire extent. on the intervention of the mediators, it was settled at 34 bags. it was on oral agreement of lease for three years from 1969-70 to 1971-72. respondents 3 and 4 agreed to pay the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 1977 (HC)

K. Venkaiah and ors. Vs. K. Venkateswara Rao and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-01-1977

Reported in : AIR1978AP166

..... ; it has acquired the meaning of the place where justice is administered and, further, has come to mean the persons who exercise judicial functions under authority derived either immediately or mediately from the sovereign. all tribunals, however, are not courts, in the sense in which the term is here employed, namely, to denote such tribunals as exercise jurisdiction over persons by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1977 (HC)

Gollamudi Siva Kumari and ors. Vs. Indian Overseas Bank, Guntur and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-31-1977

Reported in : AIR1978AP37

jayachandra reddy, j.1. defendants 1, 2 and 6 in o. s. no. 150/1970 on the file of the subordinate judge's court, guntur, are the appellants in this appeal. the plaintiff-1st respondent, indian overseas bank, laid the suit for recovery of rs. 70,046-70 ps. due under a mortgage.2. the case of the plaintiff is as follows: the 1st defendant is the wife of one late gollamudi madana mohana rao, and 2nd defendant is the son, the 6th defendant is the daughter, the 3rd defendant is the mother and the 4th defendant is his brother. madana mohana rao approached the plaintiff-bank for a cash credit facility of rs. 65,000/- for making additions and improvements to his hotel building 'durga bhavan' situated in the 3rd line, brodipet, guntur-2. the loan was sanctioned on 8-10-1969 and the same was repayable in monthly instalments of rs. 1,500/-, commencing from the month of march, 1970. defendants 4 and 5 stood as sureties. madana mohana rao executed promissory notes on 8-10-1969 for a sum of rs. 65,000/- with interest thereon at the rate of 91/2% and defendants 4 and 5 signed the guarantee on the same day jointly and severally guaranteeing the payment of debt. on the same day madana mohana rao and his brother the 4th defendant deposited the title deeds creating a security for the money advances made or to be made to the debtor, thereby constituting an equitable mortgage, madana mohana rao opened an acount and withdrew the money from time to time. unfortunately he died in an accident in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 1977 (HC)

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. G.M. Omarkhan

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-27-1977

Reported in : [1979]116ITR950(AP)

obul reddy, c.j. 1. the facts relevant for the purpose of answering the reference are these: the assessee, g.m. omar khan, was the owner of the property known as 'khadar bagh' in hyderabad. it comprises of buildings and lands measuring about 45 acres and 10 gunthas. out of this total extent, an extent of 36 acres and 22 gunthas was acquired by the government under the requisitioning and acquisition of immovable propertyact, 1952. that was in the year 1970. the collector of hyderabadordered an 'on account' payment of rs. 14,05,536 as there was likelihoodof some delay in assessing the compensation in respect of the acquired land.the assessee claimed a total compensation of rs. 1,15,86,500 with a solatiumof 15 per cent. for the acquired property. the ito issued a notice under section 148 of the act to the assessee on the ground that the acquisition tookplace on march 12, 1970, and the property acquired is non-agriculturalland and the assessee defaulted in filing voluntary return of the capitalgain earned by him which was assessable for the assessment year 1970-71.the assessee, in response to the notice, filed a return with a covering letterclaiming that he was not liable to tax on capital gain. the ito rejectedthis contention of the assessee, holding that the transfer of the property inquestion took place only on march 12, 1970, the date on which the acquiredproperty vested in the government. he also held that the property wassituated within the municipal limits of hyderabad and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 1977 (HC)

Panyam Cements and Mineral Industries Ltd. Vs. Addl. Commissioner of I ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-15-1977

Reported in : [1979]117ITR770(AP)

amareswari, j.1. in this case, the following three questions of law have been referred by the income-tax appellate tribunal under section 256(1) of the i.t. act to the high court for its opinion :'(1) whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the appellate tribunal is justified in holding that the amount of rs. 1,54,561 and rs. 51,821 received from the government of andhra pradesh as power subsidy in the assessment years 1966-67 and 1967-68, respectively, are taxable under the income-tax act, 1961 ? (2) whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the appellate tribunal was justified in law in deleting rs. 66,684 from the total income of the assessee for the assessment year 1966-67 ? (3) whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the appellate tribunal was justified in law in directing the income-tax officer to grant depreciation allowance on the roads and bridges ?' 2. the first question was referred at the instance of the assessee and the other two questions were referred at the instance of the revenue.3. in order to decide these three questions of law we may briefly refer to the facts of the case.4. by g.o. ms. no. 678 dated april 27, 1961, the industries department of the government of andhra pradesh passed an order after considering the large number of representations received by the government on the adverse effects of existing power rates upon the competitive capacity of the local manufacturers and the growth and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 1977 (HC)

Misrilal Mangilal Maternity and Child Welfare Centre Construction Comm ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-23-1977

Reported in : 1978CriLJ1360

ordermadhusudan rao, j.1. this revision is directed against the order passed by the learned xth metropolitan magistrate, secunderabad, in crl. m. p. no. 970 of 1977 on the file of his court. the petitioner is misrilal mangilal maternity and child welfare centre construction committee, represented by its chairman thakur v, hariprasad. the petitioner filed a comalaint before the xth metropolitan magistrate under sections 420 and 403 read with 120-b i.p.c. against the three respondents. the magistrate dismissed the complaint observing as follows:it is seen from the petition that the complainant thakur v. hari prasad has filed this petition in his representative capacity as chairman of the mangilal maternity and child welfare centre construction committee. it is admitted by the counsel for the complainant that it is not a registered body. i am of the opinion that in the eye of law and being an unregistered body, it has no legal existence and is not capable of holding or disposing of any property. the committee therefore cannot sue or be sued.2. an examination of the contents of the petition filed by the petitioner before the magistrate against the three respondents shows that it is a complaint within the meaning of section 2(d) of the cr. p.c. it contains clear allegations against the three respondents and a request to the magistrate that action may be taken against the respondents under the cr. p.c. of the two offences, sections 420, i.p.c. and 403 read with section 120-b, i.p.c .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 1977 (HC)

Siri Pharma and anr. Vs. Superintendent of Central Excise, M.O.R.i. an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-22-1977

Reported in : 1978(2)ELT21(AP)

b.j. divan, c.j. 1. this matter is placed before us on a reference made by our learned brother, madlusndan rao j. he has referred the matter to a division bench because he felt that the question whether the essence of chicken is liable to excise duty under entry 1-b of the first schedule to the central excises and salt act, 1944 was of considerable importance and he deemed it desirable that the case should be decided by a bench of two judges. 2. the petitioners herein are manufacturers of essence of chicken. the first petitioner is a registered partnership firm carrying on the business of pharmaceutical works of manufacture and production of patented and proprietary medicines. the first pettioner firm is the lessee of the second petitioner, and the buiness premises are owned by the second petitioner company. the essence of chicken is produced or manufactured by the first petitioner besides other medicinal goods. the first petitioner is paying excise duties to the authorities under the central excises and salt act. declaration of particulars of goods produced or manufactured and intended to be removed by the first petitioner with full particulars of the goods with drug schedule was submitted by the first petitioner to the central excise authority at vijayawada and the same was verified and found correct by the inspector on november 30, 1971. item 5 of the said declaration contained goods of 30 kinds of medicinal preparation of which item 12 was essence of chicken. at one stage .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 1977 (HC)

Seethapathi Nageswara Rao and ors. Vs. the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-07-1977

Reported in : AIR1978AP121

s. obul reddi, c.j.1. in this batch of writ petitions, the constitutional validity of s. 15-a of the andhra pradesh co-operative societies act, as inserted by act 6 of 1977, is questioned on the ground that the said section is ultra vires arts. 14, 19 and 31 of the constitution of india. as the question involved is common to all the petitions, we may refer to the facts stated by the petitioners in w. p. nos. 1892, 1929, 1732, 2025 and 2316 of 1977.2. in w. p. no. 1892 of 1977, the petitioner is sri chodeswaraswami co-operative credit society, sanipalli lanka in amalapuram taluk, east godavari district, represented by its president, bobba janakiramiah. the respondents are (1) government of andhra paradesh, represented by its secretary, food and agriculture department (2) the district collector, east godavari district and (3) the divisional co-operative officer, amalapuram, east godavari district. the petitioner-society was registered in the year 1946 and the area of operation of the society is sanapalli lanka village and its hamlet moolapalem. the population of the said village is about 6,500. the ayacut of the village is about 2,096 acres. the society consists of 250 members. the sanctioned limit of the credit which the society can disburse to its members is rs. 2,22,708. by the end of june, 1977, the society was in a position to extend credit facilities, to its members in about rs. 1,24,000. the credit facilities provided by the society to its members so far came to rs. 1,00 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 1977 (HC)

V.V.V.R.K. Yachandra Bahadur Varu Vs. the Andhra Pradesh Wakf Board, H ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-15-1977

Reported in : AIR1978AP156

order1. the simple question that is raised in this writ petition is whether the petitioner, a non-muslim, is 'a person interested in a wakf', within the meaning of s. 3 of the wakf act, hereinafter referred to as 'the act'.2. to answer this question it is enough if the undisputed facts are referred to. the petitioner is a non-muslim, and he is the owner of a premises known as bada ashurkhana, bandar khana, alawa site comprising an extent of about 60 ankanams and buildings in venkatagiri town, nellore district. the ancestors of the petitioner constructed the bada ashurkhana. it is also called nagari peerla chavidi. the ancestors of the petitioner encouraged religious activities of all religions. they were using the above site and building for performing moharam festival in which the family members and the servants of the estate used to participate for the last 100 years. the petitioner's family got peerlu made of silver and gold and they have been celebrating moharam festival from times immemorial. after the festival they used to bring back the peerlu from the ashurkhana to a safe place and used to let out the premises on monthly rent to various persons. while so, the 1st respondent wakf board initiated action for registration of the said property under s. 25 of the act. a notice was attached to the building on 3-9-1975 calling for objections. the petitioner sent a reply on 8-9-1975 claiming title to the property. but the 1st respondent passed orders on 19-12-1975 registering .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //