Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: jharkhand Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 31 results (0.004 seconds)

Dec 19 2014 (HC)

Kurban Ansari Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-19-2014

..... a forged and fabricated document and it would be evident from the order-sheets, (annexure b), wherein in the order dated 23.02.2010 it is stated that the conciliation/ mediation was taken up accordingly, on subsequent dates, i.e., 23.04.2010 and 15.06.2010, the case was fixed for amicable settlement of the dispute. it is submitted that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2014 (HC)

Aruna Rani Prajapati Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-11-2014

..... complainant. it means that the brother of the complainant has also stated before court that the house of said bal mukund/mediator was not there, at the in law's house of the complainant. moreover, his status has come as mediator, only. furthermore, the allegation against the elder brother of the husband i.e. yamuna prasad is that he had supported the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2014 (HC)

Binod Singh Vs. Raghunath Tiwari and Others

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jan-23-2014

1. this review petition has been filed for review of orderdated 18.7.2007 passed in w.p. (pil) no. 3621 of 2007. 2. the case as made out by the writ petitioner in the public interest litigation? being w.p. (pil) no. 3621 of 2007 is as under: the land appertaining to khata no. 334 plot nos. 1445 and 1446 is a property of central government as it is recorded as keshr-e-hind? in the last cadastral survey completed prior to 1910. the writ petitioner/first respondent came to know that the then circle officer illegally issued rent receipts in favour of one shiv narayan jaiswal and jagat narayan jaiswal by settling the same in their names and the said shiv narayan jaiswal and jagat narayan jaiswal have got no piece of land within the bagodar circle and at no point of time they were resident of bagodar police station. it is further submitted that the keshar-e-hind? land cannot be settled with anybody who were not resident of the area. while so, shiv narayan jaiswal and others filed an application to the secretary, deputy commissioner, hazaribagh and got an officer gyapank no. 10-1/2004-1786/revenue and inspite of the fact that the halka karamchari submitted report that the land is keshar-e-hind, the c.o., bagodar passed mutation order. one hemlal prasad, khiru mahto, rajesh kumar rai and mahendra mahto are claiming to have purchased the property falling under plot nos. 1445 and 1446 and have started construction of building. one binod singh (review applicant) m.l.a of bagodar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 2014 (HC)

Smt Shakuntala Patodia Vs. State of Jharkhand and Others

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-01-2014

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(c) no. 6878 of 2012 smt. shakuntala patodia ... petitioner versus 1. state of jharkhand 2. the deputy commissioner, ranchi 3. the sub divisional officer, sadar, ranchi 4. the deputy collector land revenue, ranchi 5. circle officer, namkum, ranchi ... respondents coram: hon'ble mr. justice shree chandrashekhar for the petitioner : mr. p.p.n. roy, sr. advocate mrs. pragati prasad, advocate for the state : mr. ashutosh kr. singh, j.c. to s.c. (mines) 07/01.12.2014 seeking quashing of order dated 04.11.2011 in misc. appeal no. 135 r 15/2002 03 and quashing of order dated 26.05.1998/28.05.1998 in case no. 3 r 8/1996 97, the petitioner has approached this court. 2. the brief facts of the case are that, by a registered deed of sale dated 16.01.1982, the petitioner purchased land comprised in revisional survey plot no. 2196 appertaining to khata no. 162 in khewat no. 5 admeasuring an area of 1 acre situated at village arra, p.s. namkum, district ranchi. vide mutation case no. 91 r 27/1981 82, after due verification and enquiry, the name of the petitioner was mutated and correction slip was issued. thereafter, rent receipt acknowledging payment of rent by the petitioner was also issued. on 16.10.2002, the petitioner came to know that on the recommendation of the land reforms deputy collector vide order dated 26.05.1998/28.05.1998, the jamabandi standing in the name of the petitioner has been cancelled by the sub divisional officer, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2014 (HC)

Krishna Kanahiya Rajhans Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-20-2014

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi. cr. m. p. no. 772 of 2008 krishna kanhaiya rajhans petitioner -v e r s u s- 1. the state of jharkhand 2. vijay kumar singh @ bijay bhusan singh 3. manohar kumar singh 4. gyan prakash khakha opposite parties. coram: - hon ble mr. justice p.p. bhatt. for the petitioner : - mr. s.p. roy, advocate mr. suresh kumar, advocate mr. ranjit kumar, advocate, advocate. for the state :- a.p.p. for the opposite parties : - mr. dilip kr. prasad, advocate 07/20.11.2014 the present application has been filed u/s 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973, for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding of complaint case being complaint case no. 72/06 including order taking cognizance dated 27.02.2008 passed by learned s.d.j.m., gumla for the alleged offence punishable u/s 119, 217, 218, 120(b) of the indian penal code.2. the brief facts of the complaint case are as under that the complainant had purchased land pertaining to khata no. 4, plot no. - 890 area 1.30 and 1.40 in total area 2.70 acres of mauza-gumla p.s. gumla vide sale deed no. 889/53 dated 30.05.1953 and vide sale deed no. 1295 of 1953 dated 24.09.1953 from one jageshwar prasad singh s/o anant rai singh. after purchasing the said property he remained in possession and mutation case no. 78r27/68-69 was filed and the same was allowed by the anchal office, gumla. it is the case of the complainant that rent receipts were jointly issued for this land along with the other land in the name of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2014 (HC)

Pushpa Singh and Others Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Cbi and Another

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-14-2014

1. initially this application had been filed for quashing of the first information report of r.c. case no. 6(s)/2010a. h.d.r, registered under section 120b read with sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the indian penal code, against the petitioners. subsequently, on submission of the charge sheet, when cognizance of the offences, as aforesaid, was taken against the petitioners vide order dated 01/02/2011, the said order has been challenged. 2. the case of the c.b.i. is that one written complaint was filed by one farukh rashid bokhari, the then senior manager, allahabad bank, zonal office, ranchi, alleging therein that petitioner no. 1 smt. pushpa singh, the managing director as well as the directors namely, saket kumar singh (petitioner no. 2) and abhijit kanti dam (petitioner no. 3) of m/s sai healthways (incorporation) private limited, entered into a conspiracy among themselves and with other persons and in furtherance of the said conspiracy they, on the basis of the forged and fabricated collateral security, induced officers of katrasgarh branch of allahabad bank to sanction term loan of rs. 1,80,00,000/with cash credit limit of rs. 15,00,000/. the loan was sanctioned for the purpose of purchasing hospital equipments and other allied assets. further it has been alleged that the managing director and both the directors got the title deeds of guarantors / mortgagors submitted to the bank for getting the loan sanctioned. after the loan was sanctioned, the borrower company never .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2014 (HC)

Smt. Kamla Devi and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-22-2014

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr. revision. no.216 of 2002 1. smt. kamla devi, w/o satyendra kumar 2. satyendra kumar, s/o deo raj prasad, resident of munsiff road, mohall jailhata, p.o. daltonganj, district palamau 3. smt. satyawanti devi, w/o rabindra prasad singh 4. rabindra prasad singh, s/o kamla prasad singh, resident of muhalla jailhata (back road of mohan cinema), p.s. daltonganj, palamau . petitioners versus 1. the state of jharkhand 2. smt. kalyani devi, w/o sri vedbrat prasad 3. vedbrat prasad, w/o late chandrika prasad verma, resident of muhalla - hamidganj, p.s. - daltonganj, palamau .... opposite parties --------- coram: hon'ble mr. justice amitav k. gupta --------- for the petitioners : mr. pankaj kumar, advocate for the state : a.p.p for the opp. parties : mr. b. p. jaiswal, advocate --------- nd 08/dated:22. december , 2014 this revision is directed against the order dated 22.02.2002 passed by the executive magistrate, daltonganj in miscellaneous case no.446 of 1997 in a proceeding under section 145 of the cr.p.c whereby the possession of o.p. no.2/ first party was declared over the land in question.2. the brief facts of the case is that the proceeding under section 145 of cr.p.c was initiated on 22.07.1997 with respect to the land of khata no.1, plot no.303 having an area of 13 decimals of village nimia, p.s. daltonganj; that notices were issued whereupon the parties appeared and opposite party/ first party filed his written statement on 11.09. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2014 (HC)

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State of Jharkhand and Others

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jan-31-2014

1. this public interest litigation was initially filed by one ashim kumar samanta, who was made a party- respondent in the present proceeding by order dated 06.02.2013, seeking a direction upon the central bureau of investigation to investigate the alleged bungling committed in the jharkhand combined entrance competitive examination conducted in the year, 2011 for admission in the medical colleges of the state of jharkhand. 2. the allegations made by the impleaded respondent no.15 in the writ petition were found frivolous and it was observed by this court that the respondent no.15 has been set up at the behest of the respondent no.16, narayan hansda. the order dated 06.02.2013 reads as under: learned counsel for the respondent no. 11 has serious allegation with respect to bonafide of the petitioner as well as reason for filing the petition in the name of p.i.l. in violation to the jharkhand high court (public interest litigation) rules, 2010. respondent's allegations against the petitioner are of very serious nature. respondent no. 11 also has placed on record several documents along with his counter affidavit. according to the learned counsel for the respondent no. 11, respondent no. 11 took the admission in the rims and he was the bonafide candidate and therefore, he was given admission in the rims. in the rims, there is one person narayan hansda who according to the respondent no. 11 is the 'boss' and is known to every person in the rims. the respondent no. 11 submitted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2014 (HC)

Madan Mohan Gond Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Its Secretary and Othe ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jan-23-2014

aparesh kumar singh, j. 1. the writ petitioner is in appeal against the judgment dated 29thaugust 2013 passed in wpc no. 6140/2012 by the learned single judge refusing to entertain his writ application. the appellant being aggrieved by the order dated 14thseptember 2012 passed by the sub divisional officer, pakur cancelling his election as mukhiya of shaharkol panchayat, had preferred the writ application seeking quashing of the same. 2. the appellant had contested the election for the post of mukhiya of the said panchayat falling within the district of pakur claiming himself to be a member of the scheduled tribe on the basis of a caste certificate issued by the sub divisional magistrate. the appellant was declared elected for the said post. the respondent no. 4 challenged his election before the sub divisional magistrate, pakur on the ground that he does not belong to the scheduled tribes category and was not eligible to contest the election as a scheduled tribe candidate for the post of mukhiya of shaharkol panchayat. 3. according to the respondent no. 4, the petitioner belongs to the caste 'gode' and not 'gond'. sub divisional officer, pakur after hearing the appellant and the respondent no. 4 and after going through the inquiry report prepared at the direction of the deputy commissioner, pakur came to the conclusion that the petitioner has been elected on the post of mukhiya on false representation of being a scheduled tribe candidate for the reserved seat of shaharkol .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2014 (HC)

Kunal Anand Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-21-2014

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p. (c) no. 4513 of 2011 excel venture construction co. (p) ltd., through one of its director, sanjeet ... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through the secretary, housing department, govt. of jharkhand, ranchi and others respondents with w.p.(c) no.4443 of 2011 niraj kumar bhattacharya ... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through the secretary, housing department, govt. of jharkhand, ranchi & others. respondents with w.p.(c) no.4444 of 2011 kunal anand ... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through the secretary, housing department, govt. of jharkhand, ranchi & others. ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 4618 of 2011 modi projects limited, through one of its directors navin modi petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through the secretary, housing department,govt. of jharkhand, ranchi & others. respondents with w.p.(c) no. 4660 of 2011 modi projects limited, through one of its directors navin modi petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through the secretary, housing department,govt. of jharkhand, ranchi & others. respondents with w.p.(c) no. 4682 of 2011 2 modi projects limited, through one of its directors navin modi ... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through the secretary, housing department, govt. of jharkhand, ranchi & others. ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 4683 of 2011 excel venture construction co. (p) ltd. through one of its director, sanjeet ... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //