Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: karnataka Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 76 results (0.010 seconds)

Apr 19 2012 (HC)

Smt. Rachamma, Wife of Late Chikkaiah. Vs. M.P. Lakshmaiah, Son of Lat ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-19-2012

..... .03.2012. learned advocates appearing for the parties identify their respective clients, who admit their signatures as appearing on the memorandum of agreement dated 30.03.2012, drawn in the mediation centre, bangalore.6. sri g.b. nandish gowda, learned advocate appearing for the respondents delivered a pay order bearing no.827082 dated 05.04.2012 for zl,00,100/-, payable ..... into an agreement under s.89 of cpc read with rules 24 and 25 of karnataka civil procedure (mediation) rules, 2005. the bmc has forwarded the said agreement along with enclosures.4. learned advocates appearing for the parties submitted that the agreement reached between the parties in the bmc ..... .p3 and the sale deed at ex.p5?"3. learned advocates on both sides having submitted that there are elements of settlement and the matter may be referred to bangalore mediation centre, to explore the possibility of settlement, the matter was referred to bmc. the parties having appeared before the bmc, they have arrived at an amicable settlement and have entered ..... dated 30.03.2012.7. the compromise entered into by the parties is lawful and can be accepted. hence, the memorandum of agreement dated 30.03.2012 drawn at the mediation centre, bangalore is placed on record. the appeal stands dismissed in terms of the said agreement.draw decree accordingly.parties to bear their respective costs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 2012 (HC)

Sri Vikastaneja Son of Rajkumar TanejA. Vs. State of KarnatakA.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-02-2012

..... act, 1961.2. complainant in the wife of the petitioner. it appears that there is already a dispute between the plaintiff and this accused matter had gone to the mediation for settlement in crlmibc.no.24/2010. before the mediation, it appear that there was some settlement. though settlement was arrived, but later on it has been withdrawn and again referred to ..... mediation. at this stage, complaint has been filed.3. considering the dispute between the parties being existed from 2010 and the complaint being filed subsequently, i find that the petitioner could .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 2012 (HC)

Prakash MartIn Tegur Vs. Smt. Joyce Samuel

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-04-2012

..... of the special marriage act, was not applicable to the parties. therefore, any order passed by the family court is held to be nullity and void ab-initio. unfortunately, the mediators and the family court have not noticed the defect in the petition. 6. in the circumstances, the appeal is allowed and the order of the court below is set aside ..... settlement arrived at before the mediation centre was accepted by the court below dissolving the marriage solemnized between the parties on 31.12.2007 as per the provisions of the indian christian marriage act 1872. the ..... . unfortunately, a joint petition was filed by the parties u/s 28 of the special marriage act 1954. the matter was referred to the mediation centre. the parties have settled their dispute before the mediation centre. the mediation centre has also accepted the terms of settlement and a memorandum of agreement as required u/s 89a of cpc came into existence. thereafter, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 2012 (HC)

Madhuri Murthy. Vs. Mr.Shivakumar ChallA.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-30-2012

..... appointed by the state under the act. nevertheless, the learned family judge observed that if both the parties consent that the matter should be referred to mediation, the question of referring it to an expert mediator does not arise. hence, this order is subject matter of the present writ petition.it is noticed that this petition was dismissed on the ground that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2012 (HC)

M/S. Balaji Silk House Represented by Its Proprietor K.C.S. Setty and ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-31-2012

..... that would fall within the purview of art. 301. the argument that all taxes should be governed by art. 301 whether or not their impact on trade is immediate or mediate, direct or remote, adopts, in our opinion, an extreme approach which cannot be upheld. if the said argument is accepted it would mean, for instance, that even a legislative enactment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2012 (HC)

M/S. Silver Springs Vs. M/S. Canara Housing Development Company and Ot ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-01-2012

..... acres 22 guntas which is distinct from the b schedule property measuring 10 acres 2 guntas and the plots are indicated in c schedule. the first plaintiff was only a mediator for arranging sale of plots to its alleged members and as such, when the agreement is not in force and the members are not before the court, the relief sought .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2012 (HC)

H.B. Karibasamma Vs. Union of India by Ministry of Parliamentary Affai ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-26-2012

..... the outer fibrous ring of the spine tears, allowing the soft, central portion to bulge out. the tear in the disc ring may result in the release of inflammatory chemical mediators which directly causes severe pain. the petitioner has been suffering from this aliment for the last 10-11 years. the petitioner is also a diabetic. the copies of the medical .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2012 (HC)

M. M. Narayana and ors. Vs. the Management of Ksrtc and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-13-2012

..... , may make a complaint in writing, in the prescribed manner -(a) to such conciliation officer or board, and the conciliation officer or board shall take such compliant into account in mediating in, and promoting the settlement of, such industrial dispute; and(b) to such arbitrator, labour court, tribunal or national tribunal and on receipt of such complaint, the arbitrator, labour court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2012 (HC)

Vishnu Vs. Abdulgani

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Aug-03-2012

..... denied his signature on this agreement of sale. p.w.1 has examined himself and also the scribe of the document as p.w.2. p.w.3 is the mediator, who brought about the sale transaction. all of them have spoken about the execution of the agreement of sale and signing of the said document by the defendant. the plaintiff .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2012 (HC)

Ashok Vs. Pandurang and Others

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Aug-21-2012

dr. k. bhakthavatsala, j. 1. in view of the order dated 31.5.2012 made in w pno.67926/2011 by learned single judge, honble chief justice by his special order dated 21.6.2012, has referred the following question to answer by this larger bench: ??whether orders made under section 136(2) of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (in short, ??the land revenue act) by the assistant commissioner in appeals preferred against the orders made under sub-section (4) or entry certified under sub-section (6) of section 129 of the land revenue act, are subject to revision by deputy commissioner under sub-section(3) of section 136 of the land revenue act? ? 2. brief facts leading to the reference may be stated as under: petitioner filed the above writ petition under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india against the respondents, for quashing the order in no.rts/ap/109/09-10 dated 23.5.2011 at annexure-c on the file of respondent no.3/assistant commissioner, chikodi, and order passed in no.rb/rta/113/2011-12 dated 12.10.2011 at annexure-e on the file of respondent no.4/deputy commissioner, belgaum. it is the case of the petitioner that the land measuring 6 acres 22 guntas in sy. no.191/3a situated at manjare village, chikodi taluk, belgaum district, was granted in favour of his father-venkaji kulkarni by the tahsildar of chikodi, under section 4(1) of bombay paragena and kulkarni watans (abolition) act, 1950. again, as per re-grant order no.rb/wrg/sr.461 dated 2.3.1958, the land in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //