Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: madhya pradesh Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 128 results (0.064 seconds)

Jan 10 2014 (HC)

Munna Alias Ramsevak Kumahar Vs. Smt.Anusuiya Kol Judgement Given B ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-10-2014

..... .a.no.1875/2008 munna @ ramsevak kumhar versus smt. anusuiya kol & ors.settlement arrived at between the parties, bearing signature of the parties and authentication of the mediator are available. keeping in view the aforesaid, no further adjudication is required in the matter. the appeal is allowed and disposed of in the terms of the settlement entered into ..... appeal. 3. no further litigation shall be made by appellant and respondent in future 4. both the parties have undertaken to remain by the terms and conditions of settlement. the mediator has submitted a detailed report indicating that the parties have resolved all the disputes in the manner as indicated hereinabove and along with the same, the copies of the m ..... smt. anusuiya kol, one of the respondents and after mediation, the dispute involved in this appeal was resolved in the following manner : 1. appellant has agreed to pay sum of rs.1,00000/- only (one lac rupees only) as compensation ..... under section 30(1)(aa) of the workmen's compensation act, 1923. this court has referred the matter for mediation on 12.9.2012. a report has been received from the mediator, which goes to show that the parties have appeared before the mediator on 15.3.2013. the appellant munna @ ramsevak kumhar was present in person and the respondents were represented by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2014 (HC)

Rajesh Shivhare Vs. Archana Shivhare

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-05-2014

..... for such long period. there is no attraction between the two. love is lost and emotions are dried up. the efforts by this court for reconciliation between the two through mediation has also failed. 10. in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, in the opinion of this court, no useful purpose would be served by dismissing this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 2014 (HC)

Seema Vs. Rajesh Dua

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-28-2014

..... , passed a decree of divorce. in this manner, this appeal has been preferred by the appellant/wife before this court. 6. it was submitted on behalf of the parties that mediation/ conciliation proceedings took place but were not successful in this appeal also. 7. the contention of the learned senior counsel shri bhardwaj for appellant is that the factum of cruelty .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 2014 (HC)

Yogesh Sunare and Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-10-2014

..... lodged during the lifetime of deceased kanchan. no panchayat was called for redressal of the dispute. the witnesses have accepted that one mahadev was mediator for arrangement of the marriage, but no complaint was made to the mediator in those three years about the dowry demand and harassment. it was alleged that one almirah was demanded within 15 days of her marriage .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2014 (HC)

Dr. Vinod Bhandari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-16-2014

..... . in the present case, only evidence against the applicant till now is the statements of two accused recorded under section 27 of the evidence act. neither any student nor any mediator nor any official have stated that the applicant played any role in taking and transferring the amount from the candidates to the officials of the 5 professional examination board. only .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 2014 (HC)

Smt. Varsha Singh Tomar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement G ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-13-2014

..... c.d. was prepared and same was received from such laboratory. from such c.d. various informations regarding serial numbers, role numbers, names, remarks of concerning candidate and name of mediator, through whom the aforesaid result of the examination was got changed by practicing fraud and committing forgery were revealed. out of such information, investigation agency came to know that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2014 (HC)

Smt. Shri Prabha Kushwaha Vs. Shyamlal Kushwaha Judgement Given By: ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-04-2014

..... not have any child, then she should have visited the house of her brother for so many times with the complaint about that fact and her brother shivnandan would have mediated between them but, shivnandan has accepted in the cross examination that he visited the house of the applicant for two times in the year. he had no personal knowledge about .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 2014 (HC)

S.M. Shrikhande Vs. The Managing Director, State Bank of India and Oth ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-10-2014

..... the supply was considered necessary from a place far away from saugor and situated in maharashtra state. (iii) was there a renowned cattle market at dondaicha? if so why this mediator was necessary? (iv) on the same lines why the order for diesel, pumpsets was placed to him ? when various other dealers, including shakti agencies of saugor (who reportedly supplied the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2014 (HC)

Sunil Rajak Vs. Manisha Rajak and Another

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-29-2014

..... mentioned in the fir, ex.d/1 or a second fir would have been lodged on the basis of that fact. 12. kancheedi lal, uncle of the applicant was the mediator of the concerned marriage and he has accepted that he was not residing in the village of the applicant. when he was called, he participated in their family functions and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2014 (HC)

Lalita Bai and Others Vs. Ajay Pal Singh and Another

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-14-2014

1. heard on admission. the appellants have preferred this second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 23.10.2008 passed by the additional district judge, maihar district satna in civil appeal no.85-a/1998 whereby the judgment and decree dated 30.9.1998 passed by the civil judge class-i, maihar in civil suit no.56-a/1991 was reversed. the trial court has decreed the suit filed by plaintiff babulal that the land bearing survey no.339/2 area 0.73 acres situated at village naktara was of deceased plaintiff babulal and the sale deed executed by the defendant no.1 bhurelal in favour of the respondent no.1 ajay pal singh was not binding upon the deceased babulal and the appellants, legal representatives of babulal. 2. during the pendency of the first appeal, the defendant bhurelal had expired and his name was deleted. similarly, plaintiff babulal had also expired, and therefore his legal representatives (present appellants) were brought on record. 3. brief facts of the case are that deceased babulal had filed a civil suit before the trial court that on 22.1.1981 he had purchased three pieces of land from defendant no.1 bhurelal by a registered sale deed. there was no dispute relating to remaining two pieces of land, but he had also purchased the land bearing survey no.339/2 area seven biswa. on 28.4.1981 a mutation was done in favour of the plaintiff. however, due to mistake of patwari, the name of plaintiff was not mutated on the land bearing survey no.339/2, but it was .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //