Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: mumbai aurangabad Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 44 results (0.005 seconds)

Oct 17 2012 (HC)

Vishwanath S/O Dohanya Pawara and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Oct-17-2012

..... penal code and sections 4, 6 and 7 of the child marriage restraint act, 1929 bearing r.c.c. no. 12 of 2009. during the pendency of the said proceeding, mediation took place between the parties and amicable settlement took place between them. 7] accordingly, parties preferred joint application in r.c.c. no. 12 of 2009 before the learned judicial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 2012 (HC)

Pratap S/O. Laxman Dhole Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Oct-05-2012

..... 1) has given evidence that about one month prior to the date of incident, when the deceased was living with him, the accused had come to house and due to mediation by one teacher, he had sent the deceased to matrimonial house. he has deposed that the deceased was reluctant to return to matrimonial house and the deceased was saying that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2012 (HC)

Vishwanath S/O Dohanya Pawara and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Oct-17-2012

..... penal code and sections 4, 6 and 7 of the child marriage restraint act, 1929 bearing r.c.c. no. 12 of 2009. during the pendency of the said proceeding, mediation took place between the parties and amicable settlement took place between them. 7] accordingly, parties preferred joint application in r.c.c. no. 12 of 2009 before the learned judicial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 2012 (HC)

Pratap S/O. Laxman Dhole Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Oct-05-2012

..... 1) has given evidence that about one month prior to the date of incident, when the deceased was living with him, the accused had come to house and due to mediation by one teacher, he had sent the deceased to matrimonial house. he has deposed that the deceased was reluctant to return to matrimonial house and the deceased was saying that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 25 2012 (HC)

Kakasaheb Haribhau Kamble Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Jun-25-2012

..... her parents to visit her matrimonial house and give understanding to pw4 and pw5. however, her parents could not visit her matrimonial house, but sent the appellant, who was the mediator in settling her marriage, to give understanding to her husband and mother in law. the appellant is the father in law of her real sister. the appellant had came to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2012 (HC)

Dr. SachIn S/O Manikrao Deshmukh Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Dec-10-2012

..... required u/sec. 20(1) and (2) of the p.c.p.n.d.t. act has not at all been followed by the authorities. the action taken was pre-mediated one. the registration of the petitioner's sonography centre was suspended vide order dated 05.06.2012, though the nomenclature was shown to be as show cause notice. the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2012 (HC)

Gangubai W/O Bhagwanrao Pawatekar and Others Vs. Kishanrao S/O Limbaji ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Jul-04-2012

1. this writ petition is filed challenging the judgment and order dated 24th october, 1991 passed by the learned member, maharashtra revenue tribunal, aurangabad in revision petition no. 101/b/90/beed declaring the respondent no. 1 kishanrao, i.e. petitioner in writ petition nos. 1822 of 1992 and 1035 of 1992, as tenant of the suit land. 2. the background facts for filing this writ petition as disclosed in the writ petition are as under : ". the petitioner herein is a daughter of late gangubai wife of bhagwanrao, who was the land owner of survey no. 122 and 142 to the extent of 3 acre and 5 gunthas, situated at village tarfa balgujzar, district beed. from the said land, one sahebrao ranuji was the protected tenant. . the mother of the petitioner gangubai did file an application under section 44 read with section 32 subsection (2) of the hyderabad tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1950 (for short, said act) on 7the january, 1961 in the office of tahsildar, beed alleging that the suit land is needed for personal cultivation of the petitioner since there is no source of income for the petitioner. accordingly, after hearing the respective parties, the tahsildar, beed ordered resumption of the suit land in favour of the petitioner herein (file no.196/tenancy/1959). . the mother of the petitioner gangubai submitted an application with prayer to put her in possession of the suit land, before the naib tahsildar (land reforms) beed. it is the case of the petitioner that, tahsildar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2012 (HC)

Gangubai W/O Bhagwanrao Pawatekar, (Deceased Through L.R.) and Others ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Jul-04-2012

this writ petition is filed challenging the judgment and order dated 24th october, 1991 passed by the learned member, maharashtra revenue tribunal, aurangabad in revision petition no. 101/b/90/beed declaring the respondent no. 1 kishanrao, i.e. petitioner in writ petition nos. 1822 of 1992 and 1035 of 1992, as tenant of the suit land. 2. the background facts for filing this writ petition as disclosed in the writ petition are as under: the petitioner herein is a daughter of late gangubai wife of bhagwanrao, who was the land owner of survey no. 122 and 142 to the extent of 3 acre and 5 gunthas, situated at village tarfa balgujzar, district beed. from the said land, one sahebrao ranuji was the protected tenant. the mother of the petitioner gangubai did file an application under section 44 read with section 32 subsection (2) of the hyderabad tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1950 (for short, said act) on 7the january, 1961 in the office of tahsildar, beed alleging that the suit land is needed for personal cultivation of the petitioner since there is no source of income for the petitioner. accordingly, after hearing the respective parties, the tahsildar, beed ordered resumption of the suit land in favour of the petitioner herein (file no.196/tenancy/1959). the mother of the petitioner gangubai submitted an application with prayer to put her in possession of the suit land, before the naib tahsildar (land reforms) beed. it is the case of the petitioner that, tahsildar (land .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2012 (HC)

Subhash S/O Pandurang Bagal Vs. Mohan S/O Vithoba Kanade

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Jun-15-2012

oral judgment: 1 this writ petition takes an exception to the judgment and order dated 15th october, 1991 passed by the learned member, maharashtra revenue tribunal, aurangabad in file bearing no. 75/b910. 2 background facts of the case for filing this writ petition are as follows: it is the case of the petitioner that one vithal s/o rangrao lomte was the original landlord bearing survey no.100/c and 104/c i.e. gat no.285 admeasuring 9 hectares, 71 ares situated at village hasegaon (shiradhon), taluka kallam, district osmanabad. said vithalrao has one daughter by name kondabai, who died prior to the death of said vithal lomte. said vithal lomte died on 11th december, 1966. the petitioner is the grand son of said vithalrao and son of kondabai i.e. daughter of vithalrao. the case of the petitioner is that the deceased vithalrao executed registered will-deed on 2nd december, 1966 in favour of the petitioner subhash. the revenue authority has mutated the name of the petitioner in revenue record by mutation entry no.27 in the year 1979. it is the case of the petitioner that, he is the only legal representative of the deceased vithalrao. 3 the petitioner filed an application under section 44(3) read with section 32 of the hyderabad tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1950 on 13th august, 1972 for personal cultivation before the tahsildar, kallam, contending therein that, after the death of said vithalrao, he is the only successor became owner of the suit land and also the will- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 2012 (HC)

Gautam S/O Kashiram Puri Vs. Shilabai @ Shivabai Vishwanath Banale and ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Oct-04-2012

oral judgment: 1] rule. rule is made returnable forthwith. by consent of parties, matter is heard finally. 2] the proceeding is filed u/s 482 of cr.p.c. for setting aside judgment and order of criminal revision application no.34/04 which was pending in the court of ad-hoc additional sessions judge, ambajogai, dist.beed. the revision application was filed to challenge the order of issue process made in private complaint filed by respondent no.1 shilabai for offence u/s 218, 465, 420 etc. of ipc. the process is issued against the petitioner and also respondent no.2. the revisional court has observed that present applicant who was working as circle officer made the mutation mischievously without following the due procedure and so the protection is not available to him of section 197 of cr.p.c. the app supported the judgment delivered by sessions court. 2] the copy of complaint is produced. the complaint shows that one mallikarjun was the owner of agricultural land bearing gat nos.756 and 757 situated at ghatnandur, tq. ambajogai, dist.beed. at the time of his death, land admeasuring 23 acres 19 gunthas was standing in his name. the complainant is sister of said mallikarjun and deceased has left behind 3 more sisters. deceased had left behind him one chandrakant as his son and respondent no.2 kusumbai is the widow of chandrakant. chandrakant has left behind some issues also. bhagirathibai was widow of mallikarjun and after her death application for mutation was made. 3] .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //