Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: mumbai Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 222 results (0.011 seconds)

Mar 12 2003 (HC)

One-up Shares and Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. R.R. Singh, Commissioner ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-12-2003

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR856; (2003)183CTR(Bom)254; [2003]262ITR275(Bom)

..... handed back to the mediators.'2. in view of the above statement of shri agarwal, the commissioner of income-tax, central-ii, new delhi, granted concurrence to the proposal made by the director-general of ..... not booked any sale or purchase of shares. i have never placed any orders of sale/purchase of shares. the simple modus operandi was that certain mediators had given to me, bogus profit entries. that the mediators used to approach me with cheques, drawn in favour of friends portfolio pvt. ltd. these cheques were deposited in the bank account and cash was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2003 (HC)

One-up Shares and Stock Brokers (P) Ltd. Vs. R.R. Singh, Cit

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-12-2003

Reported in : [2003]129TAXMAN687(Bom)

..... was handed back to the mediators.'in view of the above statement of shri agarwal, the commissioner central-ii, new delhi granted concurrence to the proposal made by the director general of income tax (investigations) for ..... not booked any sale or purchase of shares. i have never placed any orders of sale/purchase of shares. the simple modus operandi was that certain mediators had given tome, bogus profit entries. that the mediators used to approach me with cheques, drawn in favour of m/s. friends portfolio (p) ltd. these cheques were deposited in the bank account and cash .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2003 (TRI)

Paras Warehousing Corporation, Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-20-2003

Reported in : (2003)(156)ELT504Tri(Mum.)bai

..... was at the premises of paras warehousing corporation, appellant in appeal c/138/95. investigation also revealed that sale of some goods by the importer had been done through a mediator sunil j. shah, a broker (appeal c/130/95). the notice that was issued in july 1993 proposed confiscation of the seized quantities of titanium dioxide, demand for duty of ..... j. shah that it has not been shown that he was aware that the goods could not be sold for want of permission from the licensing authority, and therefore a mediator in their sale in good faith, is not successfully rebutted by the departmental representative. he only emphasises that the broker was concerned with the sale. the fact that he emphasises .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2003 (HC)

The Goa Mrf Employees Union, a Registered Trade Union, Represented by ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-02-2003

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ379Bom

..... , may make a complaint in writing, in the prescribed manner, - (a) to such conciliation officer or board, and the conciliation officer or board shall take such complaint into account in mediating in, and promoting the settlement of, such industrial dispute; and (b) to such arbitrator, labour court, tribunal or national tribunal and on receipt of such complaint, the arbitrator, labour court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 2003 (HC)

The Kolhapur District Central Cooperative Bank Limited Vs. Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-07-2003

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR1; 2003(4)BomCR582; (2003)IILLJ913Bom

..... and the state cooperative bank at the apex. the district central banks and state cooperative banks are federal institutions. the district banks function as a balancing centre and is a mediator in rural, agricultural lending through primary societies and sustains barely on negligibly slender margin of interest, received for the services rendered by it. the bank works not as a profit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2003 (HC)

Pride of Asia Films Vs. Essel Vision

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-15-2003

Reported in : 2004(3)ARBLR169(Bom); 2004(5)BomCR870

..... inter se, but not in a manner which creates a legally enforceable remedy. examples of such tribunals, are tribunals of local religious communities or persons privately appointed to act as mediators between two disputing persons or groups. the supreme court formulated the attributes which must be present in an arbitration agreement and these are as follows :'(1) the arbitration agreement must .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2003 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Walchandnagar Industries Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-06-2003

Reported in : [2003]262ITR212(Bom)

s.h. kapadia, j.1. the following questions of law have been referred to us for our opinion under section 256(1) by the tribunal at the behest of the department. the reference pertains to the assessment year 1978-79.'(i) whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 35b of the income-tax act, 1961, on the guarantee commission of charges of rs. 5,91,015 paid to e.c.g.c. on commission of rs. 8,37,862 paid to tata exports and on 75 per cent. of the proportionate administrative expenses of rs. 2,54,356 ?(ii) whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was right in law in deleting the addition of rs. 29,983 made under section 37(2a) of the income-tax act on account of entertainment expenditure incurred by the assessee ?(iii) whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was right in law in holding that the excess price of sugar collected over and above the control price fixed by the government for the assessment year 1978-79, was not taxable as income of the assessee for said assessment year ?'facts :2. the assessee is a public limited company engaged in the business of manufacture of industrial machinery required for manufacture of sugar. the assessee claimed weighted deduction under section 35b on three items, viz., guarantee commission paid to the export credit guarantee corporation amounting to rs. 5,91,015; rs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2003 (HC)

Shrikant R. Sankanwar and ors. Vs. Krishna Balu Naukudkar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-16-2003

Reported in : 2003(1)ALLMR1161; 2003(3)BomCR45; 2003(2)MhLj276

r.m.s. khandeparkar, j.1. heard the learned advocates for the parties. perused the records. rule. by consent, the rule made returnable forthwith.2. the petitioners challenge order dated 6-8-2002 passed by the additional commissioner, pune division, pune, allowing the revision application at the instance of the respondent against the order of additional collector kolhapur dated 24-8-2001. additional collector, kolhapur by the said order dated 24-8-2001 had set aside the order dated 19-2-2001 of the sub-divisional officer, gadhinglaj. the sub-divisional officer, gadhinglaj, in turn by his order dated 19-2-2002 while allowing the appeal of the respondent had set aside the order dated 15-12-1998 passed by the tahsildar, chandgad in rts no. 26 of 1998. the tahsildar of chandgad had allowed the application filed by the petitioners for necessary mutation of entry in favour of the petitioners claiming right of occupation to the suit premises based on the registered sale deed dated 15-7-1998. the said order was passed while exercising the powers under the provisions of law contained in section 149 read with section 150 of the maharashtra land revenue code, 1966 (hereinafter called 'the said code').3. though the impugned order is sought to be challenged on various grounds, it is not necessary to consider all those grounds and suffice to refer to the ground regarding the scope of powers of the revenue officers under section 149 read with section 150 of the said code and the contention .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 2003 (HC)

State of Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Maharashtra Land Development Corpora ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-31-2003

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR24

c.k. thakker, c.j.1. writ petition no. 1052 of 1998 is filed by the state of maharashtra against respondent no. 1 for an appropriate writ, direction or order quashing and setting aside the order passed by the maharashtra revenue tribunal in appeal forest-3 of 1997 wherein it was held that the land in question is neither 'forest' nor 'private forest' within the meaning of the maharashtra private forests (aquisition) act, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said act'). a prayer is also made to set aside the order passed by sub-divisional officer, bombay suburban district dated 23rd april, 1985 under section 6 of the said act. a declaration is sought to the effect that the land bearing survey no. 345-a situated at village dahisar is 'forest' and 'private forest' under the act and as such the land stands acquired and vested in the state of maharashtra.2. it is the case of the petitioner-state that the land in question was part of original survey no. 345. survey no. 345 was admeasuring about 650 acres. at all relevant times, it was shown as 'forest land' in the revenue records. in or about 1947 out of 650 acres, about 365 acres was acquired for the purpose of 'national park' at borivli. original survey no. 345 was divided into three survey numbers, being survey nos. 345-a, 345-b and 345-c. the land which was acquired was survey no. 345-b. from the remaining land, land admeasuring about 75 acres was given survey no. 345-c and the land in question admeasuring about 209 acres was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2003 (HC)

Marazban Jehangirji Patel Vs. the State of Maharashtra,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-02-2003

Reported in : 2004(4)ALLMR446; 2004(4)MhLj682

a.m. khanwilkar, j.1. this petition under article 227 of the constitution of india takes exception to the judgment and order dated may 10, 1989, passed by the then minister of state for revenue, government of maharashtra (respondent no. 2), in revision no. rts-2789/1/cr-39/l/6. the lands in question are survey nos. 62 and 66 respectively situated at village ashagad, taluka dahanu, district thane. the said lands being inam lands were governed by the bombay merged territories and area (jagir abolition) act. 1953, as well as the bombay merged territories miscellaneous alienations abolition act, 1955. the revenue record mentions that shri yeshwantrao mukne, the ex-ruler of the then jawhar state, was watandar in respect of the said lands. on october 8, 1976, an application was filed by the petitioner, which was jointly signed by the said watandar mukne, addressed to the tahsildar, dahanu, for recording the status of the petitioner as a tenant and also for granting permission to sell the said lands. the said application was obviously a composite application praying for recording the name of the petitioner in the revenue record as tenant and also for granting permission to sell the said lands in favour of the petitioner. as far as the former relief is concerned, the same is referable to the intimation sent by the parties within the meaning of section 149 of the maharashtra land revenue code, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said code'), which requires that any person acquiring .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //