Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: patna Page 1 of about 1,016 results (0.026 seconds)

Sep 17 2009 (HC)

Sudhanshu Mauli Tripathi Son of Sri Umakant Tripathi Vs. Meena Kumari ...

Court : Patna

Reported in : 2010(58)BLJR195

..... about a reconciliation between the contesting parties, this court had tried to bring about a reconciliation between the parties and had expressed desire to refer the matter for mediation to the patna high court mediation centre at the choice of the respondent/wife. the relevant extract of the order dated 20.3.2009, is reproduced herein below:by order dated 22.05 ..... proposed mediation if the respondent-wife opts for the same.put up this case under the same heading after one week.12.1 on the next date i.e. 15.4.2009, ..... mediation, this court would like to refer this matter for mediation to the patna high court mediation centre even if learned counsel for the appellant chooses not to appear. if required, notices may have to be sent to the appellant for the ..... last 17 years.in the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it appears in the interest of justice that an opportunity may be given to the parties for settling their dispute through mediation provided they are agreeable. learned counsel for the respondent wife prays for one week's time. if the respondent-wife opts for .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2012 (HC)

Shankar Jha Vs. Smt. Mala Jha

Court : Patna

..... that mediation shall be completed and a report shall be submitted to this court by the second week of march 2012. both the parties shall make available copies of ..... the facts of the case the matter deserves to be given a chance for reconciliation through mediation. accordingly, the matter is referred to patna high court mediation centre so that trained mediator may take up the case for mediation for which both the parties should appear before the mediation committee with or without their counsels on 3 rd february, 2012. 2 let a copy of ..... this order be communicated to the patna high court mediation centre for taking necessary steps. it is expected ..... relevant papers to the learned mediator. list this matter in the third week of march under the same heading. (shiva kirti singh, j.) (aditya kumar trivedi .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2012 (HC)

Shyamnath Rai Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.15817 of 2011 ====================================================== shyamnath rai .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ===================================================== 13. 01-2012 the petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a compliant case in which cognizance has been taken under section 498a of the indian penal code and section 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act. with the agreement of both sides, the matter was referred to mediation centre of the patna high court on 26.09.2011. the report of the mediation centre, at flag-a, reflects that no acceptable settlement could be reached between the parties. both sides agree for mutual parting ways on payment of one time alimony. learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time to seek instruction with regard to the payment of one time alimony. put up this case on 13th of february, 2012 at 2.10 pm in chambers. let the interim order dated 20.05.2011 be continued. (dinesh kumar singh, j) amrendra kumar/-

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 2012 (HC)

Prabhakar Kumar Kushwaha Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... of 2010, pending in the court of j.m.f.c., patna shall remain stayed. however, the matter may be referred to the high court legal services committee, patna for mediation of the matter. (shivaji pandey, j.) vinay/-

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 2012 (HC)

inderjeet Kumar Roy @ Sonu Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... in a case registered under section 498a/34 of the indian penal code and sections 3/4 of dowry prohibition act. the matter was referred to the patna high court mediation and conciliation centre but unfortunately the matter could not be sorted between the parties. the grievance of the informant is that she is not being paid the amount of rs .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 2012 (HC)

Nand Kishore Rai @ Pappu Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under sections 341, 323, 498a and 494/34 of the indian penal code. the matter was referred to the patna high court mediation and conciliation centre but unfortunately the matter could not be sorted out between the spouses but by way of an interim arrangement the petitioner is agreeable to pay a sum .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 2012 (HC)

Md. Mozammil HussaIn Vs. the State of Bihar and anr

Court : Patna

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.24758 of 2011 md. mozammil hussain versus the state of bihar & anr ---------------------------------- 3. 19.1.2012 the matter was referred to the patna high court, mediation/conciliation centre and the report of the centre is that now the matter has been sorted out between the parties. in view of such, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today in connection with complaint case no.514 of 2010 on furnishing bail bonds of rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of smt. rashmi, j.m. 1st class, gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the code of criminal procedure as also conditions (i) that one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. the bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. narendra/ ( anjana prakash, j.)

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2012 (HC)

Rohit Mahto @ Nanu Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.205 of 2012 rohit mahto @ nanu versus the state of bihar 2. 13.01.2012. heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is languishing in custody since 01.07.2011 in a case registered for the offence under section 302 of the indian penal code. it is alleged that the victim was called by the mother of this petitioner for mediation of fight which was going on in between the petitioner and his wife when it is alleged that the petitioner fell down the victim on the ground and pressed the neck of the victim some abrasion injury has been found on the neck and fracture on the ribs of the victim. it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the injury might have been caused by falling of the victim on the ground but assuming the accusation, the case does not fall within the parameter of section 302 of the i.p.c. which is convinced by submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned c.j.m. kishanganj in connection with pothia p.s. case no. 69 of 2011. u. k. ( dinesh kumar singh, j)

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2012 (HC)

Raju Saw Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... the named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant opposite party no. 2 with various allegation. submission is that dispute between the parties has been resolved in mediation centre of this court and they have entered into certain agreements on 22.12.2011, which indicates dissolution of their marital knot with mutual consent and payment of one time .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2007 (HC)

Veveka Nand Mehta @ Viveka Nand Mehta and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... for the occurrence was alleged enmity between accused appellant shiv narain mehta and the deceased for the reason that son of shiv narain mehta was married at purnea due to mediation and efforts of deceased ganesh mehta but the daughter-in-law of shiv narain mehta had been left by her husband leading to a litigation in which the deceased had .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //