Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: punjab and haryana Page 100 of about 14,152 results (0.082 seconds)

Apr 22 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. G.S. Nagra Advocate Vs. Harnam Singh and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

cr no.2343 of 2014 -1- in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh cr no.2343 of 2014 date of decision: 22.04.2014 rulia singh ....petitioner versus harnam singh and others ..respondents coram:- hon'ble mr.justice rajiv narain raina present: mr.g.s.nagra, advocate, for the petitioner. 1. to be referred to the reporters or not?. 2. whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?. rajiv narain raina, j. this petition is directed against the order dated january 17, 2014 passed by the additional civil judge (senior division).guru har sahai declining the application of the petitioner for amendment of pleadings invoking order 6 rule 17, cpc. the application was filed on october 7, 2013. the issues were framed long ago on january 19, 2007. the suit was filed by rulia singh and smt. dhanno.isher singh was the grandfather of plaintiff no.1. plaintiff no.2 is the daughter of isher singh. there are 18 defendants in the original suit in which the plaintiff claims possession of land measuring 39 k and 8 m being one third share each of plaintiff nos.1 and 2 thereby totalling 1/3rd share out of total land measuring 118 k7m comprised in khewat, khatouni and killa numbers mentioned in the head note to the plaint falling in the revenue estate of village guru har sahai, tehsil and district ferozepur. the claim is based on title reflected in the jamabandi for the year 1998-99. mittal manju 2014.04.22 15:53 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh cr no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2014 (HC)

Present:- Mr. G.S.Nagra Advocate Vs. Sukhwinder Kaur and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

rs.no.2944 of 2013 (o&m) 1 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh rs.no.2944 of 2013 (o&m) date of decision:07.05.2014 ajaib singh ....appellant versus sukhwinder kaur and others ....respondents coram:- hon'ble mr.justice rakesh kumar garg1 whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?. 2. to be referred to reporters or not?. 3. whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?. present:- mr.g.s.nagra, advocate for the appellant. rakesh kumar garg, j this is plaintiff's second appeal challenging the judgments and decrees of the courts below whereby his suit, for declaration to the effect that he along with respondent no.3 were the absolute owners in possession of the suit land, with consequential relief of permanent injunction, as well as, appeal against the aforesaid judgment and decree of the trial court, were dismissed by the courts below respectively. in brief, case of the plaintiff-appellant was that the suit land was owned and possessed by mit singh, isher singh, harnam singh sons of labh singh to the extent of 3/4 share and dalip singh, inder singh, pritam singh, beant singh sons of isher singh to the kadian savita 2014.05.14 12:38 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh rs.no.2944 of 2013 (o&m) 2 extent of 1/4 share along with some other land which had fallen into their share in consolidation proceedings. isher singh, dalip singh, inder singh, pritam singh, beant singh had exchanged .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 2014 (HC)

Present:- Mr. Ashish Gupta Advocate Vs. Sanjiv Kumar and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

rs.no.2695 of 2013 (o&m) 1 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh rs.no.2695 of 2013 (o&m) date of decision:23.05.2014 tarsem lal and others ....appellants versus sanjiv kumar and others ....respondents coram:- hon'ble mr.justice rakesh kumar garg1 whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?. 2. to be referred to reporters or not?. 3. whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?. present:- mr.ashish gupta, advocate for mr.vikram singh, advocate for the appellants. rakesh kumar garg, j (oral) this is plaintiffs' second appeal challenging the judgments and decrees of the courts below whereby their suit for declaration that they along with defendants no.10 to 12 (now proforma respondents no.10 to 12) are the owners in joint possession to the extent of 1/9th share in the suit property, with further relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants no.1 to 9 from alienating the suit land, was dismissed. in the suit, it has been alleged that originally one ishar dass was the owner of the suit property measuring 68 kanals 15 marlas as detailed in the head note of the plaint. his estate was inherited by his three sons, namely, rala ram, shankar dass and kadian savita 2014.05.30 11:07 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh rs.no.2695 of 2013 (o&m) 2 babu ram having 1/3rd share each. all the aforesaid sons of ishar dass have died and the suit land has been devolved upon their successors. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 2014 (HC)

Darshan Singh and Others Vs. Sukhdev Kaur @ Shiv Dev Kaur and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

-1- rsa no.1557 of 1987 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh rsa no.1557 of 1987 date of decision:15. 05.2014 darshan singh and others ....appellants versus sukhdev kaur @ shiv dev kaur and others ....respondents coram: hon'ble mr. justice paramjeet singh1 whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?. 2) to be referred to the reporters or not ?. 3) whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?. present: - mr. kanwaljit singh, sr. advocate, with mr. b.b.s. randhawa, advocate, and mr. sanjeev sharma, advocate, for the appellants. mr. m.s. rakkar, sr. advocate, with mr. k.g. chaudhary, advocate, for the respondents. ***** paramjeet singh, j.this regular second appeal by defendants is directed against the judgment and decree dated 25.03.1987 passed by learned additional district judge, patiala, whereby judgment and decree dated 01.03.1983 passed by learned sub judge ist class, rajpura, has been set aside and the suit of the plaintiff for possession has been decreed. for convenience sake, reference to parties is being made as per their status in the civil suit. the detailed facts of the case are already recapitulated in the judgments of the courts below and are not required to be reproduced. singh ravinder 2014.05.30 16:14 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh -2- rsa no.1557 of 1987 however, the facts relevant for disposal of this second appeal are to the effect that plaintiff dial kaur filed a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 30 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. M.L.SarIn Senior Advocate with Vs. Karan Singh and Others ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

vinod kumar 2014.07.04 10:21 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh rsa no.2687 of 1989 (o&m) [1]. ***** in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh rsa no.2687 of 1989 (o&m) date of decision:30.06.2014 karan singh and others ...appellants versus raghbir singh and others ...respondents coram: hon'ble mr. justice rakesh kumar jain present: mr. m.l.sarin, senior advocate, with ms. ankita sambyal, advocate, for the appellants. mr. h.n.mehtani, advocate, for respondent no.1. ***** rakesh kumar jain, j.learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that following two questions of law are involved in this appeal:- 1. whether the civil court had the jurisdiction to set aside the instrument of partition affecting the rights of the minors who were not represented through their natural guardian/court guardian?.2. whether a suit for declaration without seeking consequential relief is maintainable?. the brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs filed suit for declaration alleging that they were co-sharers in the land measuring 506 kanal 4 marlas, comprised in khewat no.406, khatauni no.85 to 89, vinod kumar 2014.07.04 10:21 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh rsa no.2687 of 1989 (o&m) [2]. ***** situated in village dhoka. defendants no.1 to 7 filed an application for partition before the assistant collector 1st grade, charkhi dadri, in which the plaintiffs, who were minors at that time, were also arrayed as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. G.S.Jaswal Advocate Vs. Tarlok Singh and Another ...Respo ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

rsa no.5096 of 2010 -1- in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh rsa no.5096 of 2010 date of decision: july 1, 2014 jasbir singh & others ...appellants versus tarlok singh & another ...respondents coram: hon'ble mr. justice m. jeyapaul.1. whether the judgement should be reported in the digest?. yes ---- present: mr. g.s.jaswal, advocate for the appellants. mr. amit rawal, sr.advocate with mr. namit gautam, advocate for the respondents. m. jeyapaul, j.1. the unsuccessful defendants are the appellants herein. the plaintiffs and defendants no.1, 3 and 4 were sons and defendants no.5 and 6 are the daughters of deceased bant singh. the 2nd defendant is the wife of the 1st defendant.2. it is contended by the plaintiffs that the land in dispute is the ancestral joint hindu co-parcenary property of the plaintiffs and defendants no.1, 3 and 4. it was held by bant singh as karta of the family. the plaintiffs acquired birth right in the suit land being the co-parceners. the plaintiffs came to know that the land in village bhattian was wrongly entered into in the name of the 1st defendant on the basis of the impugned decree dated 18.5.1993 and the ownership of the land in village rajgarh was gulati sumit 2014.07.08 11:18 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document rsa no.5096 of 2010 -2- entered into in the name of the 2nd defendant on the basis of impugned sale deed dated 21.2.1994, when he proceeded to get the mutation done on the demise of bant singh. it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. J.S. Cooner Advocate Vs. the Financial Commissioner Harya ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

cwp no.16848 of 2013 1 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh c.w.p.no.16848 of 2013 date of decision: july 25, 2014 smt. sukhwinder kaur ..petitioner versus the financial commissioner, haryana and others ..respondents coram: hon'ble mr.justice paramjeet singh present: mr.j.s.cooner, advocate, for the petitioner. mr.sandeep s. mann, sr.dag, haryana. mr.r.k.rana, advocate, for respondent nos.2 to 4. paramjeet singh, j. (oral) instant writ petition has been filed under articles 226/227 of the constitution of india for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 21.01.2013 (annexure p/1) passed by financial commissioner, haryana respondent no.1 whereby revision petition filed by the petitioner has been adjourned sine die till the decision of this court in rsa. brief facts of the case are that gurbachan singh @ bachan kumar virender 2014.07.31 17:56 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.16848 of 2013 2 singh son of kartar singh had executed registered will dated 28.06.1980. on his death, mutation was sanctioned in favour of the petitioner on the basis of the will by assistant collector ist grade, naraingarh vide order dated 07.10.1980. against that, gurnam singh, predecessor-in-interest of respondent nos.2 to 4 filed an appeal before district collector, but during the pendency of the appeal, gurnam singh also filed civil suit claiming the property to be of sis satluj jagir. vide order dated 26.05. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 2014 (HC)

Present: Vs. Parmanand and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

regular second appeal no.1251 of 2014 1 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh regular second appeal no.1251 of 2014 date of decision: august 04, 2014 sanjay kumar .......appellant versus parmanand and another .......respondents coram:- hon'ble mr.justice tejinder singh dhindsa present: present mr.akshay kumar goel, advocate for the appellant. tejinder singh dhindsa, j.the plaintiff-appellant is in second appeal before this court having remained unsuccessful in both the courts below.2. briefly stated, the plaintiff-appellant filed the suit for permanent injunction against the respondents on the averments that he had purchased 11 marlas land i.e. 11/74th share of the suit property from naresh singh who was power of attorney holder of umrav singh and mahabir singh, sons of shri matu ram. it was further averred that having purchased the same, boundary wall had been constructed by him but now the defendants on the basis of some illegal sale-deed were claiming themselves to be the owners of the suit property and were adamant to demolish the boundary wall constructed by the plaintiff and wanted to grab the suit property illegally. against such brief factual backdrop, the suit had been instituted. sushama rani malik201408.12 14:59 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document regular second appeal no.1251 of 2014 2 3. upon notice, the defendants filed written statement taking a stand that the plaintiff is not owner of any share of the land comprised in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 2014 (HC)

Rsa No.2649 of 2010 (Oandm) Vs. Dharampal and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

mukesh kumar saluj.rs.no.2649 of 2010 1 2014.08.14 12:31 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court for the states of punjab & haryana at chandigarh rs.no.2649 of 2010 (o&m) date of decision:04.08.2014 bhuru ram ...appellant versus dharampal and others ...respondents coram: hon'ble mr.justice rameshwar singh malik1 to be referred to the reporters or not ?. 2. whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?. present: mr.o.p.goel, sr.advocate with mr.r.s.mander, advocate for the appellant. mr.j.v.yadav, advocate for respondent no.1. mr.haripal verma, advocate for respondents no.2(a) to 2(c).rameshwar singh malik, j. defendant is in second appeal against the concurrent findings of fact, recorded by both the learned courts below in a suit for specific performance, whereby suit of the plaintiff-respondents was decreed. brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are that plaintiff/respondent no.1 filed a suit for specific performance, on the allegations that defendant no.1 dharampal entered into an agreement to sell dated 22.9.1992 with the plaintiff-respondent no.1, to sell the agricultural land comprised in khewat no.41, khatoni no.65 measuring 49 kanals 14 marlas to the extent of 1/8th share i.e.6 kanals 4 marlas, khewat no.43, khatoni no.67 measuring 39 kanals 14 marlas to the extent of 1/16th share measuring 2 kanals 10 marlas, khewat no.50, khatoni no.77 measuring 12 mukesh kumar saluj.rs.no.2649 of 2010 2 2014.08.14 12:31 i attest to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2014 (HC)

Present : Mr. A.K. Chopra Sr. Advocate with Vs. Krishna Wati and Other ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

rs.no.752 of 2005 (o&m) -1- in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh rs.no.752 of 2005 (o&m) date of decision:06.08.2014 m/s doaba hoteliers pvt.ltd.jullundur ..appellant versus krishna wati and others ..respondents coram : hon'ble mr.justice rameshwar singh malik present : mr.a.k.chopra, sr.advocate with mr.harminder singh, advocate for the appellant. mr.j.s.gill, advocate and mr.sunil garg, advocate for the respondents. **** 1. to be referred to the reporters or not?. 2. whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?. **** rameshwar singh malik j. present regular second appeal, at the hands of defendant no.4, is directed against the judgment and decree dated 4.10.2004 passed by the learned district judge, whereby judgment and decree dated 5.1.1981 passed by the learned trial court were set aside, allowing the firs.appeal of the plaintiffs and their suit for possession by partition of land, was decreed. brief facts of the case, as recorded by the learned district judge in paras 2 to 14 of the impugned judgment, are that originally, the appeal filed against the judgment dated 5.1.1981 passed by the learned trial court was accepted by the then learned additional district judge, jalandhar, vide judgment and decree dated 5.1.1981. however, one of the defendants namely jaladhar improvement trust, jalandhar through its administrator had thakral rajeev 2014.08.22 10:36 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh rs.no.752 of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //