Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: punjab and haryana Page 2 of about 14,152 results (0.110 seconds)

Feb 21 2013 (HC)

Present:- Mr.S.S. Narula Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... aag, punjab, accepts notice. copy given. this petition is dismissed as not maintainable but in order to enable the petitioner to participate in the mediation proceedings, it is ordered that petitioner will not be arrested till february 23, 2013 subject to any decision in his application pending before the additional ..... a similar application is finally adjudicated upon by a lower court. but since there are chances of resolving of the matrimonial controvers.before the mediation and conciliation centre on an unconditional offer of the petitioner to resume cohabitation, it is deemed appropriate to give a fair opportunity to the ..... feasible for him to appear before the mediation and conciliation centre and express his bonafide intention to resume cohabitation with his wife complainant. heard. legally a petition under section 438 cr.p ..... alongwith him, it is expedient in the interest of justice that he should accompany his parents at the time of mediation to make a bonafide offer to the complainant to accompany him. since the petitioner does not have any interim relief, it will not be ..... the petitioner is pending before this court and that the parents have been directed to appear before crm m-4377 of 2013 [2].the mediation and conciliation centre of punjab and haryana high court on february 22, 2013. since the petitioner is ready to reconcile and take the complainant .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 2014 (HC)

“contends That Petitioner Is Ready to Rehabilitate Vs. State of Hary ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the court that the petitioner has since joined investigation. it is also the conceded position between the parties that they had earlier appeared before the mediation & conciliation centre of this court and subsequently even before the mediation centre of hon'ble supreme court of india. still further, a settlement dated 25.3.2014 had been arrived at between the parties. a copy ..... of such mediation report dated 25.3.2014 has been produced by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the same is taken on record as mark-a. broadly the terms of settlement ..... .12.2013, passed by this court is made absolute. suffice it to observe that the parties shall remain bound by the settlement dated 12.2.2014 arrived at before the mediation & conciliation centre of this court and which further has been clarified in the light of settlement dated 25.3.2014 before the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2013 (HC)

Debjit Dutta Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... and 6.7.2013. in case of petitioner doing so, he will be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. petitioner, thereafter, would appear before the mediation and conciliation centre of punjab and haryana high court on 8.7.2013. notice be issued to respondent no.2 debarati roy @ dutta daughter of shri amit roy, resident of ..... mediation and conciliation centre to enable her to meet the travelling and misc. expenses. for awaiting the result of mediation to come up on the date fixed. this order will not, in any manner, prejudice the rights of the investigating agency ..... house no.865/5, ground floor, gali no.5, patel nagar, gurgaon, haryana, to appear before the mediation and conciliation centre on said date. petitioner will pay a sum of ` 25,000/- to the complainant on her appearance before the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Sandeep Goyal Advocate Vs. Surjeet Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... any fraud, coercion or undue influence. i and my husband have resolved our differences and decided to bring the marriage to an end in terms of compromise recorded before the mediation and conciliation centre, punjab and haryana high court, on 15.02.2012. i stand by my affidavit dated 17.07.2012. i have not changed my mind and i am ..... any fraud, coercion or undue influence. i and my wife have resolved our differences and decided to bring the marriage to an end in terms of compromise recorded before the mediation and conciliation centre, punjab and haryana high court, on 15.02.2012. i stand by my affidavit dated 19.07.2012. i have not changed my mind and i am ..... all the disputes and differences in this regard have been amicably settled by the parties hereto through the f.a.o.not m-126 of 2011 -5- process of conciliation/mediation.14. that the parties undertake to abide by the terms and conditions set out in the agreement and not to dispute the same hereinafter in future. . the compromise was duly ..... failed to prove the allegations of cruelty. aggrieved by judgment and decree, dated 05.04.2010, sudesh kumari, filed an appeal. during pendency of the appeal, parties appeared before the mediation and conciliation centre of the punjab and haryana high court and arrived at a compromise in the following terms:- 1. the parties have decided to part ways by getting divorce .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2014 (HC)

Parveen Saini and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the parties. the fir has been registered on the complaint of rameshwari (respondent no.3) as matrimonial dispute and differences have arisen between the parties. now, with the efforts of mediation and conciliation centre in the high court, the parties have agreed to settle their matrimonial dispute and differences amicably between themselves. the parties have decided to seek mutual divorce and ..... , matrimonial dispute arose between the parties and the above mentioned fir was got registered. during the cours.of proceedings for grant of anticipatory bail, the case was referred to the mediation & conciliation centre of this court, where a compromise was arrived at between the petitioners and the complainant. on the basis of the said compromise, a petition for grant of decree ..... that a compromise dated 23.7.2013 (annexure-p.2) has already been effected between the parties before the mediation and conciliation centre of the high court and she has received draft of `5 lacs as per the settlement before the mediation and conciliation centre of this court and she has no objection, if the fir and further proceedings are quashed. she .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2014 (HC)

Bikramjit Singh and Another Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... case -3- sequelly, similar order was passed on march, 27, 2014 in the 2nd case as well. ultimately, good sense prevailed and parties have amicably settled their dispute before the mediation & conciliation centre of this court, by virtue of compromise dated 02.05.2014, which, in substance, is as under:- this matter is again taken up at the ..... mediation centre for the amicable settlement of matrimonial dispute. the small group which was formed on last mediation has come out with their suggestions and practical solutions. accordingly, the matter is finally settled amicably. a total sum of rs. 1 ..... will be released to the complainant- satwinder kaur. the balance of rs. 80,000/- will be paid on the next date of hearing i.e. 21.05.2014 at the mediation centre and the parties may also exchange their gold ornaments as well as other articles-photographs, cd etc on the next date of ..... mediation. it is also agreed that after the payment of rs. 1,80,000/- and exchange of aforesaid articles, further steps will be taken by the parties for cancellation/quashed of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr.Paramjit Singh Jammu Advocate Vs. State of Haryana and Oth ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... 15:07 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh crm no.m-37787 of 2013(o&m) 3 deed(annexure p-2) before the mediation and conciliation centre of this court. the factum of compromise is also reiterated by complainant- reeta rani and her husband rakesh jamalia in their respective affidavits.5. what cannot ..... other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, invoking the provisions of section 482 cr.p.c., inter alia, pleading that with the active participation and guidance of the mediator, the parties have amicably settled their disputes. they have redressed their grievances. the parties have performed their respective part of the agreement/settlement-deed (annexure p-2). complainant-reeta rani ..... (annexure p-2) before the mediation and conciliation centre of this court.3. having compromised the matter, now the petitioners-accused have preferred the present petition, to quash the impugned fir(annexure p-1) and all ..... 2. sequelly, the petitioners-accused filed a petition for the grant of anticipatory bail in this court bearing crm no.m-24491 of 2013. the matter was referred to the mediation and conciliation centre of this court for amicable settlement. ultimately, good sense prevailed and the parties have amicably settled their disputes by virtue of settlement-deed dated 11.10.2013 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora Advocate Vs. Ravinder Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the supreme court could come within the ambit of conduct. in my opinion these two judgments would not help the case of the petitioner. no doubt the agreement before the mediation is legally enforceable, more so since the parties have acted upon it. however, it would be too far fetched to term any deviation therefrom as a contempt of court. as ..... judge, family court and another reported as air 201.allahabad 107 wherein the allahabad high court held that some legal sanctity would have to be attached to the proceedings of mediation. second judgment relied upon is in the case of maninderjit singh bitta v. union of india and others reported as 2012 air sc (cri) 326 in which the hon'ble ..... for permanent alimony, maintenance, stree dhan etc.the petitioner duly paid that amount. another condition was that the respondent shall not claim the custody of the minot child. after the mediation proceedings the parties did dissolve their marriage by a decree of divorce by way of mutual consent, however, thereafter the respondent filed a petition for custody of the minot child ..... reported in the digest?. ajay tewari, j. (oral).this petition has been filed claiming that the matrimonial dispute between the petitoner and his wife was sent for mediation by this court and in the mediation proceedings it was decided that the parties would dissolve their marriage by a decree of divorce by way of mutual consent. one of the conditions was that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 2015 (HC)

Kamaljeet Sachdeva and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... a dishonest litigant and shall also render the court proceedings to a mockery, which cannot be permitted in law. 14. further, the settlement was arrived at between the parties during mediation proceedings. the legislature has amended section 89 of code of civil procedure in the year 2002. there is an all round attempt by the legislature and judiciary, as well as ..... as the complainant. thus, the matter was mutually settled between the parties before the mediation and conciliation centre of delhi high court vide annexure p-2. it is also a matter of record that in compliance of the above-said mutual settlement arrived at between ..... exercising its inherent jurisdiction under section 482 cr.p.c., for the following more than one reasons. 8. it is a matter of record that parties were referred to the mediation and conciliation centre before the delhi high court and a detailed agreement was written on 4.3.2013 (annexure p-2) which was signed by all the accused as well ..... that although statement of the complainant namely anil kumar sachdeva was recorded, wherein he stated that accused kamaljeet was his real brother and matter was compromised between them before the mediation and conciliation centre at delhi high court, but since the terms and conditions of compromise have not been fully satisfied till date, he requested for some more time to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2013 (HC)

Jawahar Lal Chug Vs. the State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... out of matrimonial dispute. the affected parties have sorted out their disputes and effected a compromise. the statement of respondent no.2/complainant has already been recorded by the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court. the copy of the said statement is available on the file bearing criminal misc. not m-22756 of 2013, which has been taken up ..... respondent no.2/complainant, ritika khurana, was recorded in criminal misc. not m-22756 of 2013. the copies of the statements and the report have been received from the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court and the same are placed on the file of criminal misc. not m-22756 of 2013 which is also fixed for today before this ..... parshad makhija & others versus the state of haryana & anr . was also referred to the director, mediation and conciliation centre for recording the statements of sharma seema s 2013.08.13 09:58 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh criminal misc. not ..... proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise. vide order dated 06.08.2013, this court had directed respondent no.2/complainant and the petitioner to appear before the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court for making their respective statements with regard to the compromise. another petition bearing not criminal misc. not m- 22756 of 2013 titled as ram .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //