Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 156 results (0.076 seconds)

Nov 24 1997 (HC)

Radhey Shyam and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-24-1997

Reported in : (1998)IILLJ1217P& H; (1998)119PLR1

..... and do all such things he thinks tit for the purpose of including the parties to come to a fair and amicable settlement. if the conciliation officer succeeds in his mediation efforts then section 12(3) requires him to make a report of such settlement together with memorandum of settlement signed by the parties to the dispute and send it to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1997 (HC)

Mandeep Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-28-1997

Reported in : II(1997)DMC284

..... father-in-law surjit singh, her husband sukhdev singh, her brother-in-law mandeep singh (bobby) and her sister-in-law smt. bela came with the efforts made by her mediator jasbir singh and held a meeting with her parents and brothers. inspite of the counselling given to them, they did not understand and again demanded rs. 5 lacs repeatedly. so ..... was sent to the complainant in order to meet her expenses at the time of the birth of the child. in the month of september, 1995 her mother, father, brother, mediator and one gurcharan singh randhawa went to the house of her in-laws at mandi in order to persuade her husband and in-laws. they also extended an invitation about .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 1997 (HC)

Baljeet Kaur @ Kulvinder Kaur Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-26-1997

Reported in : I(1998)DMC498

..... . the accused demanded a maruti car, colour t.v. and fridge. they beat amarjit kaur and turned her out of the house. the complainant went to the accused with certain mediators and requested them not to harass his daughter but the accused were adamant in their demand and warned him that if their demands are not fulfilled, they will not allow ..... kaur in their house. but, after some time she was again beaten, harassed and turned out of the house. again the complainant went to the house of the accused with mediators, but they refused to keep amarjit kaur in their house till their demands are met and also threatened that they will get baljinder singh married with some body else. a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 1997 (HC)

Baljeet Kaur and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-26-1997

Reported in : II(1998)DMC655

..... . the accused demanded a maruti car, colour t.v. and fridge. they beat amarjit kaur and turned her out of the house. the complainant went to the accused with certain mediators and requested them not to harass his daughter but the accused were adamant in their demand and warned him that if their demands are not fulfilled, they will not allow ..... kaur in their house. but, after some time she was again beaten, harassed and turned out of the house. again the complainant went to the house of the accused with mediators, but they refused to keep amarjit kaur in their house til1 their demands are metar also threatened that they will get baljinder singh married with some body else. a day .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1997 (HC)

Ramesh Khullar and anr. Vs. Alka @ Dimple

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-21-1997

Reported in : II(1998)DMC636

..... clock.'therefore, it cannot be stated that the allegations regarding entrustment are vague and general. but the contention of the petitioners is that first petitioner - ramesh khullar was only a mediator at the time of marriage and the second petitioner- meena is the sister of the complainant's husband, who has also been married and lives away from the matrimonial home ..... procedure to quash the complaint and the summoning order. according to the first-petitioner, he (ramesh khullar) is not related to the husband of the respondent but was only a mediator (bachola) at the time of the solemnization of the marriage. the petitioners also urge that the second- petitioner who is sister-in-law of the respondent is staying at sunder .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 1997 (HC)

Saroj Vs. Shiv Dayal and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-18-1997

Reported in : I(1999)DMC446

..... and that they have mutually agreed to get the marriage dissolved.4. smt. saroj, petitioner no. 1 shall receive a sum of rs. 2,50,000/- in lumpsum from the mediator shri hira nand arya who is present in court. she has relinquished all her claims towards maintenance, permanent alimony and dowry etc. she shall withdraw the complaint filed by her ..... now pending in the court of ilaqa magistrate, palwal.5. shri shiv dayal, petitioner no. 2 has handed over the amount of rs. 2,50,000/- to hira nand arya, mediator, who shall pay the same to smt. saroj devi, petitioner no. 1. shri shiv dayal vide his statement recorded today has withdrawn the allegations with regard to adultery and cruelty .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 1997 (HC)

Gram Panchayat Vs. Director Consolidation of Holdings and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-06-1997

Reported in : (1997)116PLR719

s.c. malte, j.1. petitioner gram panchayat has filed this writ petition for relief of quashing the order dated 27.4.1992 passed by the director, consolidation, punjab, chandigarh.2. in the course of proceedings for consolidation of holdings under the punjab consolidation act, 1948, land admeasuring 628 standard killa and 6 standard maria had been reserved for common purposes. the scheme was thus finalised in 1959. it appears that out of this land, land admeasuring 105 standard kanal and 12 standard marla was earmarked for the income of the gram panchayat. about 250 standard kanal area was to be used for the passage. some portion out of this land was earmarked for school and hospital. it is also appears that an area of 370 standard kanal was considered as 'bachat' land (land remaining after earmarking of utilization). this portion was to be entered in the revenue record in the account of 'khewat' of zumla mustarka malkan'. the observations in the impugned order indicate that sometimes in 1984-85 this land was mutated in the name of gram panchayat instead of in the account of 'zumla mustarka malkan' such an entry was found to have been made without any order to that effect. this is one of the factors that was considered by the director of consolidation while ordering the re-opening of the consolidation scheme which was finalised long back in 1959. besides that, the consolidation scheme was re-opened on finding that the land earmarked for the school and the hospital had not been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1997 (HC)

Surjit Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-11-1997

Reported in : (1997)116PLR477

b. rai, j.1. this petition has been filed under articles 226/227 of the constitution of india for quashment of annexure p1 and also subsequent proceedings for entering the mutation in favour of gram panchayat, respondent no. 3.2. brief facts are that there is land measuring 273 kanals in village bargat, district kurukshetra. in the column of ownership of jamabandi for the year 1984-85, the petitioners and other right-holders of the village are recorded as owners in possession of this land since consolidation proceedings took place in the village. before the present petitioners, their ancestors were in cultivating possession of this land and it was not utilised as shamilat deh. a decree for declaration regarding partition between the petitioners was passed by a civil court on november 18,1983. that decree was not challenged by the gram panchayat at any time. now after about thirty years of finalisation of consolidation scheme, respondent no. 2 has written a letter, dated august 3, 1990 annexure p1 to the tehsildar, thanesar to record mutation in favour of gram panchayat instead of recording it in the names of the petitioners and other right-holders mentioned in the jamabandi for the year 1984-85. it is further alleged that on the basis of annexure p1, the tehsildar has initiated proceedings for the change of mutation in the name of gram panchayat. it is further pleaded that earlier also, letters exhibits p2 and p4 were written by the deputy commissioner to the tehsildar for .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 1997 (HC)

Phuman and ors. Vs. Tara Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-06-1997

Reported in : (1997)116PLR749

n.k. kapoor, j.1. this is unsuccessful plaintiffs' regular second appeal.2. plaintiffs filed a suit for possession by redemption of land as per details given in the head note of the plaint on payment of rs. 1679.88 paise or any amount which the court may fix.3. according to plaintiffs, one assu, predecessor-in-interest of plaintiffs mortgaged the land for a sum of rs. 1679.88 paise with sohawar singh, wasawa singh sons of jiwan singh, sawan singh and dial singh i.e. assu was the mortgagor whereas sohawar singh and ors. were the mortgagees. according to plaintiffs, the date of mortgage was 5.6.1943. it is the case of the plaintiffs that additional mortgage was created on 4.8.1946 and 24.8.1946. these mortgage deeds were registered in kasur which is now in pakistan. as per terms of the mortgage deed, the period or mortgage was 9 years. since the defendants have declined to accept the mortgage amount and deliver back possession of the property, hence the present suit.4. defendants no. 3 and 4 contested this suit, other defendants were proceeded ex parte. according to contesting defendants, the suit was not within time, it has not been properly valued for the purposes of court fee and jurisdiction and that the plaintiffs had no right to file the suit. other pleas with regard to maintainability of suit etc. too were raised.5. on the pleadings of parties, a number of issue were framed, but primarily the contest revolved around issue no. 1 - whether the suit is within time opp6. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 1997 (HC)

iqbal Singh Vs. Hernek Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-09-1997

Reported in : (1998)120PLR364

v.k. jhanji, j.1. this shall dispose of regular second appeal no. 527 and 1436 of 1996, r.s.a. no. 527 of 1996 has been preferred by the plaintiff whereas r.s.a. no. 1436 of 1996 has been preferred by proforma defendant, namely, kako @ iqbal kaur. both the appeals have been directed against the judgment and decree of the courts below whereby suit filed by the plaintiffs for declaration to the effect that they are owners in possession of 233 kanals being half share of land measuring 466 kanals, has been dismissed.2. in brief, the facts are that one surjan singh was the owner of land measuring 466 kanals as detailed in the head-note of the plaint. surjan singh had three sons, namely, joginder singh, santokh singh and baldev singh. baldev singh died issue-less during the life time of surjan singh. after the death of surjan singh, joginder singh and santokh singh became the owners of land measuring 233 kanals each. santokh singh died issuless leaving behind jas kaur being his widow. mutation regarding the estate of santokh singh was sanctioned in favour of jas kaur and jas kaur became owner in possession of land measuring 233 kanals, being half share of land measuring 466 kanals. plaintiffs sukhdev singh and iqbal singh are the sons of joginder singh. it is the case of plaintiffs that jas kaur died on 3.6.1989 and on her death they have become owners of land left by jas kaur on the basis of will dated 28.5.1989 allegedly executed by her in their favour. plaintiffs also alleged .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //