Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 159 results (0.025 seconds)

Aug 01 2007 (HC)

Jasbir Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-01-2007

Reported in : II(2007)DMC771

..... by mutual consent. respondent-2 has also filed an affidavit that the matter has been compromised and the petitioners have deposited rs. 14.00 lakh only as maintenance with the mediator. she has received half of the amount in terms of the compromise and the balance half amount is to be received at the time of passing the decree for divorce ..... kaur in court today which is to the effect that the matter has been compromised and the petitioners have deposited the maintenance amount of rs 14.00 lakh with the mediator. out of this, half of the amount is to be paid to her on the quashing of the present fir and the remaining half at the time of decree for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2007 (HC)

Jindal Strips Limited and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-14-2007

Reported in : (2008)12VST149(P& H)

..... that would fall within the purview of article 301. the argument that all taxes should be governed by article 301 whether or not their impact on trade is immediate or mediate, direct or remote, adopts, in our opinion, an extreme approach which cannot be upheld.47. the third view was expressed by shah, j., who held that the freedom contemplated under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2007 (HC)

NaraIn Ram and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-12-2007

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3341

..... her last. the present proceedings were initiated as the complainant wanted to extract money from them. one jaswant singh, the alleged mediator was produced as a defence witness.10. the trial court, after appraisal of the evidence before it, went on to convict the appellants and sentenced them to various periods of ..... on the fateful intervening night of 30-6-1992 and 1-7-1992, naresh kumari fell ill and they along with the elder brother of narain ram and jaswant singh-mediator and other respected members of the village took her in tractor-trolly to civil hospital, mansa and while she was being removed from the trolly in the hospital, she breathed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2007 (HC)

Daulat Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-14-2007

Reported in : II(2008)DMC751

..... alleged by him, then he would have refrained from going to her parental house time and again till her death. the trial court has disbelieved allegations set up against lajwanti mediator of marriage. since, lajwanti had nothing to do with the scooter and she was in no way beneficiary in the said demand, question of raising demand of scooter by lajwanti ..... ba. and proved his report ex. p-8. pw 5 was the younger brother of the karnail singh complainant and uncle of deceased krishana bai. he stated that lajwanti was mediator of the marriage between krishana bai and daulat singh. he also deposed about the demand of the scooter. he further deposed that on the asking of the complainant, when he .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 2007 (HC)

Jasminder Singh Vs. Smt. Prabhjinder Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-10-2007

Reported in : AIR2008P& H13

..... relations with the appellant were cordial from june, 1996 till november, 1996 when her mother-in-law returned from canada but cash was demanded by her in-laws through the mediator on which they paid a sum of rs. 1.25 lacs towards furniture expenditure. her mother-in-law also desired to have a car on which her father purchased a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2007 (HC)

Surjit Singh Vs. Mohinder Singh and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-04-2007

Reported in : (2007)4PLR99

satish kumar mittal, j.1. this order shall dispose of four regular second appeals bearing r.s.a. nos. 2280, 2281, 2282 and 2283 of 2006. these appeals are arising from four different suits filed by both the parties pertaining to the same property claiming cross relief against each other.2. in this case. harbhajan singh (hereinafter referred to as the defendant') sold 56 kanals of land being a co-sharer in the joint land to mohinder singh vide registered sale deed dated 3.11.2003 for a consideration of rs. 42,00,000/-. out of the said amount, a sum of rs. 34,00,000/- was paid by means of bank drafts and cheques which stood credited to the account of the defendant and the remaining amount of rs. 8,00,000/- was paid to the defendant in cash before the sub registrar at the time of execution of the sale deed. the physical possession of 56 kanals of land, which was with defendant harbhajan singh under an arrangement with other co-sharers, was delivered to mohinder singh. surjit singh son of harbhajan singh (hereinafter referred to as 'the second defendant') was the co-sharer in the joint khewat. however, defendant harbhajan singh sold 56 kanals of land to the extent of his half share in the khewat. undisputedly, the sale by harbhajan singh was not beyond his share in the joint khewat. after the sale, a mutation was also sanctioned in favour of plaintiff mohinder singh.3. after the sale and sanction of the mutation, disputes arose between the parties with regard to the execution of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 2007 (HC)

Naranjan Singh Vs. Bachittar Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-15-2007

Reported in : (2007)4PLR258

vinod k. sharma, j.1. this regular second appeal has been filed against the judgments and decrees passed by the learned courts below decreeing the suit filed by the plaintiff-respondents for possession of 101 kanals 9 marlas of land being one third share of 304 kanals 7 marlas situated in village kauni tehsil and district faridkot.2. the plaintiff claimed that they are sons of bhagwan kaur alias bhagni alias bhagwan who was the daughter of sobha singh son of gurdit singh, landowner/proprietor of village kauni. it was claimed by the plaintiffs that in the jamabandi for the year 1951-52 of village kauni, sobha singh was owner in possession to the extent of half share along with sawan singh and sucha singh who had other half share in 431 kanals 3 marlas of land. sobha singh is stated to have died on 5.11.1953 leaving behind his daughter bhawan kaur alias bhagni alias bhagan as his sole heir to his estate. share of sobha singh used to be cultivated by sucha singh and sawan singh on batai and after the death of sobha singh tenants paid batai to bhagwan kaur alias bhagni alias bhagan. on the death of sawan singh, his estate was inherited by his brother sucha singh. it was claimed that before consolidation share of bahgwan kaur was cultivated by sucha singh to the extent of half share and arjan singh, nazar singh and gujjar singh remaining half share under her. it was further claimed that during consolidation both lines got the land separated. it was claimed that share of sobha .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2007 (HC)

Gajjan Singh Vs. Virsa Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-28-2007

Reported in : (2007)147PLR634

vinod k. sharma, j.1. this is an appeal against the judgment passed by the learned additional district judge, amritsar vide which the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial court was set aside and case remanded back to the trial court to record a finding on issue nos. 2 to 6, 9 and 10.2. the plaintiff respondent filed a suit for joint possession of 4/15th share i.e. 26 kanals 13 marlas out of land measuring 100 kanals 2 marlas as described in the head note of the plaintiff and according to the jamabandi for the year 1992-93 situated at village amrik. the plaintiff claimed to be owner of 4/15 th share of suit land and claimed that defendant no. 1 was owner of 1/5 th share out of the suit land and defendant nos. 2 and 3 are the owners of 4/6 th share each out of the suit land and further defendants have no concern or interest in the suit land. it was claimed that the plaintiff had gone abroad to iraq and remained there for 5-6 years. the plaintiff claimed that he came to know about mutation no. 1074 regarding the sale by the plaintiff in favour of tara singh son of dula singh to the extent of half share and sajjan singh son of inder singh remaining half share. the mutation was claimed to be illegal, null and void on the plea that the plaintiff had not executed any sale-deed in favour of tara singh and sajjan singh. it was further pleaded that virsa singh plaintiff had not executed any power of attorney dated 8.6.1983 in favour of chanan singh son of meghar singh .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2007 (HC)

Giani Ram and ors. Vs. Ompati and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-29-2007

Reported in : (2008)149PLR811

vinod k. sharma, j. 1. this regular second appeal has been filed against the judgments and decrees passed by the learned courts below decreeing the suit for declaration filed by the plaintiff-respondent no. 1. 2. the plaintiff filed a suit for declaration to the effect that munshi alias handa and ran singh were entitled to inherit the estate of chandu at the time of his death to the extent of half share each and mutation no. 2126 was said to have been wrongly entered and sanctioned on 12.1.1979 by the assistant collector ii grade, hansi in the name of munshi alone. it was claimed that out of the land measuring 99 kanals 11 marlas chandu had 1/4th share in khewat no. 161 and 1/40th share of land measuring 531 kanals 5 marlas comprised in khewat no. 167 as per jmabandi for the year 1977-78. it was claimed that the plaintiff and proforma defendants no. 6 and 7 were entitled to 1/240th share each of the share of chandu who had 1/40th share in the suit land as detailed in the head-note of the plaint. they also claimed to be in possession of the same which now was comprised in khewat no. 189 khatauni no. 360 and 386 situated at village narnaund district hissar as per jamaandi for the year 1987-88. the plaintiff along with proforma defendants also claimed 1/24th share each of 1/4th share of chandu deceased in the land measuring 99 kanals 11 marlas which was said to be in possession of the plaintiff and now comprised in khewat no. 181 and khatauni no. 333/337 at village narnaund .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 2007 (HC)

ishwar Dayal Vs. Ram Richpal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-18-2007

Reported in : (2007)4PLR234

vinod k. sharma, j.1. the present regular second appeal has been filed against the judgments and decrees passed by the learned courts below vide which the suit filed by the plaintiff-appellant for declaration to the effect that he was owner in possession to the extent of 5/12 share in the suit land which previously existed in the name of his father phul chand, was dismissed. he also challenged mutation no. 405 dated 29th of august, 1973, vide which 1/4th share in the land detailed in the heading of the plaint was mutated in his favour. the mutation was sanctioned on the basis of succession on the death of phul chand. the plaintiff-appellant claimed that the suit land described in the heading of the plaint was a coparcenary property of the plaintiff, defendant no. 3 and their father phul chand, who all constituted a joint hindu family. phul chand left behind the following legal heirs:1. ishwar dayal (son) plaintiff2. smt mamo devi (daughter) defendant3. smt. har piari (widow) defendant4. mam chand (son) defendant2. the plaintiff-appellant set up his case on the plea that the suit land existed in the name of phul chand on account of the fact that he was a 'karta' of the family and that the share which was open to succession on the death of phul chand, was only 1/3rd share in the whole land with a result that on his death, mutation in respect of 5/12 share should have been sanctioned in plaintiffs name and not of 1/4th share as was done in mutation no. 405. it was further .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //