Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 780 results (0.026 seconds)

Dec 05 2012 (HC)

Lakhwinder Singh. Vs. State of Punjab and Others.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-05-2012

..... case of kulwinder singh v. state of punjab, 2007(3) rcr (crl.) 1052. since the parties have amicably settled the matter, which is matrimonial in nature, due to intervention of mediation and conciliation centre of this court, the present petition is allowed and the impugned fir no.243 dated 02.11.2011 under sections 406/498a ipc, registered at police station ..... petitioner under section 438 cr.p.c.for anticipatory bail and that due to intervention of mediation and conciliation centre of this court compromise has been effected between the parties, which is annexure p2. it has also been contended that consequent to said compromise decree of divorce ..... . i have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record. it has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that both the parties appeared before mediation and conciliation centre of this court in compliance of order dated 12.01.2012 of this court passed in crl. misc. not m-39059 of 2011, which was filed by ..... no.2 and 3. ***** ram chand gupta, j.(oral) crm no.72862 of 2012 requests for placing on record copy of compromise effected between the parties due to intervention of mediation and conciliation centre of this court as annexure p2. the same is taken on record subject to just exceptions. crm stands disposed of. crm not m-28124 o 2. crm .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 22 2012 (HC)

Naveen Sharma Vs. Pooja Sharma and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-22-2012

..... live peacefully together will rather result in the advancement of the social justice and promote peace and harmony. taking into account the allegations, compromise as well as report of the mediation and concilation centre, there is no impediment in the way of this court to quash the impugned orders in view of the above said settled proposition of law. accordingly, the ..... residing together. at the request of the learned counsel for the parties, vide order dated 09.11.2001, the parties were directed to appear before the mediation centre. now, a report has been received from the mediation and concilation centre, stating therein that the matter has been compromised between the parties. as per the said compromise, petitioner - naveen sharma and respondent-pooja .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 2012 (HC)

Hari Singh Mann Resident of House No.538, Sector 11-b, Chandigarh and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-23-2012

..... a provision cannot efface. afcons ruling of restrictive interpretation of courts powers was commented upon in a foreword by sh.fali nariman in the book by sh. sriram panchu, mediation: practice and law, the path to successful dispute resolution, lexisnexis butterworths wadhwa (2012), as a setback; a strained construction has been placed on a most important and salutary provision in ..... the code. he sounded a grave picture that, after the decision in afcons, there is not much help to be expected on adr in the future from the courts. mediation must stand on its own; in success judged on its own record, un-assisted by judges. 17. the situation is perhaps not as grim. in afcons, the plaintiff consented but .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2012 (HC)

Naresh Batra Vs. Vikram Batra and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-29-2012

..... the counsel on behalf of the respondents was shown. on 5.9.2011, the adjournment was sought on the ground that the matter was pending between the parties before the mediation centre. thereafter, again the petition was adjourned from time to time till 7.3.2012. on that day, this case alongwith other petitions pending between the parties was ordered to ..... seven years. during its pendency, the petition has gone through the hands of 24 judges. no doubt, some time was consumed during the period this petition was taken up for mediation, which failed, but still one request after another was made to seek adjournment for the purpose of negotiated settlement. this had to be brought to an end and the cases .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2012 (HC)

Present Mr.G.S.Sirphikhi Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-13-2012

..... court. learned crl. misc. not m-34900 o 2. .counsel for the petitioners has drawn my attention to the compromise arrived at between the parties with the intervention of the mediation and conciliation centre of this court during the proceedings of criminal misc. no m-.30246 of 2011. the terms of compromise have come in the ..... mediation proceedings dated 5.10.2012 (annexure p2).the contested decisions made by the courts leave scars on the litigants who lose the battle. in a decision based on compromise, none .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2012 (HC)

Present: Mr.Amarjit Markan Advocate for Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) R ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-20-2012

..... arising therefrom in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties. learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that not the parties have arrived at a compromise before the mediation and conciliation centre on 27.8.2012. in pursuance to the said compromise, petitioners have deposited ` 12,50,000/- before the court of additional district judge, ludhiana. ` 12,50,000 ..... .10.2012 alongwith respondent no.3 and they both had admitted the factum of compromise between the parties. on the said date, in pursuance to the compromise effected before the mediation and crl.misc.not m- 34350 of 2010 (o&m) 3 conciliation centre, two drafts in the sum of ` 5,00,000/- and ` 7,50,000/- were handed over by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2012 (HC)

Dildar Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-18-2012

..... . the learned state counsel is unable to precisely state as to which dowry articles are to be recovered. the matter was also sent to the mediation and conciliation centre, however, as per the report of the mediator, the mediation also failed. keeping in view the totality of the circumstances and the fact that the petitioner is in service of the punjab government, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2012 (HC)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTiCE NARESH KUMAR SANGHi. Vs. Unknown

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-17-2012

..... instructions from asi jatinder singh of police station civil lines, batala, admits the factum of compromise. learned counsel for the state has also gone through the proceedings conducted before the mediation and conciliation center of this court and has no objection, if the impugned fir and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. heard. the present criminal litigation has arisen out ..... of divorce was challenged before this court vide fao not m-94 of 2011. he further submits that during the pendency of the said appeal, the matter was referred to mediation and conciliation center of this court. he further submits that better sense prevailed between the husband and wife-respondent no.2 and a compromise (annexure p-3) was effected between .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2012 (HC)

Jagdeep Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-29-2012

..... also filed petition under section 9 of the hindu marriage act (for short the `act') for restitution of conjugal rights. he has also requested that matter may be sent to mediation and conciliation centre of this court for reconciliation. however a very vague plea has been taken in this regard. he has not given the date of filing of the petition ..... plea of counsel for petitioner that he is ready to take the complainant to matrimonial home does not appeal to the conscience of this court. the sending this case to mediation and conciliation centre of this court is declined. complainant's father is no more. her widow mother could not spend more in the marriage and hence, she was turned out .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2012 (HC)

Present: Mr. Vishal Goyal Advocate for Vs. Chandigarh Administration a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-18-2012

..... sell the house but her son is not ready to sell the house. they have property dispute. this court had directed the parties to appear before the mediation centre for an amicable settlement. report of mediation centre has been received in this regard. as per report dated 14.05.2012, the parties could not reach to an amicable settlement. after going through .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //