Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 3,283 results (0.031 seconds)

Aug 02 2013 (HC)

Fao No.M-404 of 2010 (Oandm) Vs. Nisha

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-02-2013

..... and therefore, pray that their marriage may be dissolved by grant of a decree of divorce in terms of the settlement arrived at before the mediation and conciliation centre, of this court. janesh kumar has handed over, to the respondent, a total amount of rs.16 lacs by way of ..... with janesh kumar may be dissolved by grant of a decree by mutual consent in terms of our compromise dated 26.7.2012 recorded before the mediation & conciliation centre, punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh. despite our repeated efforts, we have not been able to bridge our differences and the ..... nisha may be dissolved by grant of a decree of divorce by mutual consent in terms of our compromise dated 26.7.2012 recorded before the mediation & conciliation centre, punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh. despite our repeated efforts, we have not been able to bridge our differences and the ..... (5) the parties hereto confirm and declare that they have voluntarily and of their own free will arrive at this settlement/agreement in the presence of mediator as well as their counsels; (6) the following settlement has been arrived at between the parties hereto:- (a) that the parties have agreed that ..... 12.8.2010. aggrieved by this order, janesh kumar filed an appeal. during pendency of the appeal, the appellant and the respondent appeared before the mediation and conciliation centre, of this court and executed a settlement/agreement deciding to part ways on terms and conditions, which read as follows:- (1) disputes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. VipIn Mahajan Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-19-2013

..... no.2, surinder kaur, is the mother-in-law of respondent no.2, anju bala. on 13.8.2013, petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 appeared before the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court and suffered their respective statements with regard to the compromise. the report has also been received from the director wherein it has been mentioned ..... lines, batala, very fairly concedes that the private parties have sorted out their disputes and effected a compromise. he also concedes that hc patras masih was present before the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court when petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 suffered their respective statements with regard to the compromise. he also contends that he has no ..... &m 3. in compliance of the above order, petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 did appear before the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court and got recorded their respective statements with regard to the compromise. the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court has sent the copies of their statements along with his report, dated 13.8.2013 ..... , anju bala (wife) as well as the representative of the state of punjab, were directed to appear before the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise. the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court was also directed to send a report in that regard along with copies of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2013 (HC)

Gurjeet Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-26-2013

..... to enable her to meet the travelling and other misc. expenses. report of the mediation and conciliation centre be sent to this court on april 2, 2013, the next date kumar suresh 2013.10.01 11:52 i attest to the ..... appropriate in the interest of justice to explore the feasibility of any amicable compromise between the parties. petitioner is directed to appear before the mediation and conciliation centre of punjab and haryana high court on march 18, 2013. the complainant who is present in the court, is also directed to appear ..... before the mediation centre of punjab and haryana high court on said date. it is ordered that petitioner will pay a sum of rs.15000/- to the complainant ..... document chandigarh crm no.m-7252 of 2013 5 of hearing. it will be appreciated in case a team of two mediators be deputed to determine the feasibility of any amicable settlement. the mediators will determine the bonafide of the offer of the petitioner to resume cohabitation. meanwhile, an interim order is passed that ..... , 2013 subject to his joining investigation on march 16, 2013 .. the matter was sent to the mediation centre of this court but the mediation failed. there is no need to discuss the reasons for failure of mediation as sought to be raised. but in view of serious allegations made in the fir substantiated with material .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 2013 (HC)

Crm No.M-13874 of 2013 Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-17-2013

..... acknowledged the factual matrix and submitted that the petitioner has already joined the investigation. he is no longer required for further interrogation, at this stage. moreover, as per report of mediation and conciliation centre of this court, the parties have amicably settled their disputes, by virtue of settlement dated 16.09.2013. kumar naresh 2013.09.20 14:17 i attest ..... 11, 2013 and in case of his doing so, he will be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. thereafter the petitioner will appear before the mediation and conciliation centre of punjab and haryana high court on may 17, 2013. complainant mohita uppal & simran resident of house no.2843, banian mohalla, banian gali kartarpur, district jalandhar, ..... the fir are serious of having made an attempt to put the complainant on fire by pouring kerosene oil but there is always scope of settlement of matrimonial dispute by mediation. in order to explore the possibility of any amicable settlement, notice of motion for july 15, 2013. meanwhile, an interim direction is issued that the petitioner will join investigation ..... be issued notice to appear before the mediation centre on abovesaid date. petitioner will pay a sum of rs.15000/- to the complainant before the mediation centre to enable her to meet the travelling and misc. expenses. for awaiting the report of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2013 (HC)

Ram Parshad Makhija and Others Vs. the State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-08-2013

..... 2013.08.12 17:10 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh criminal misc. not m-22756 of 2013 ..5.report received from the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court, reveals that both the parties voluntarily made the statements with regard to the compromise. taking into consideration the above facts, the chances of ..... parties. he, after going through the statements and the report forwarded by the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court, submits that he has no objection if the impugned fir and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed. learned counsel for respondent no ..... this court and in consonance with the compromise effected between the parties, a draft of ` 6,00,000/- has been handed over to respondent no.2/complainant before the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court. learned counsel for the state, on instructions from asi ravinder singh, police station, city, rewari, admits the factum of compromise effected between the ..... , therefore, her statement could not be recorded. on 06.08.2013, the parties were present in the court, therefore, they were directed to appear before the director secretary, mediation and conciliation centre of this court for getting their respective statements recorded in the present petition as well as the another petition bearing crm-m-22769 of 2013 titled as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 2013 (HC)

Present:- Mr.S.S. Narula Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-21-2013

..... aag, punjab, accepts notice. copy given. this petition is dismissed as not maintainable but in order to enable the petitioner to participate in the mediation proceedings, it is ordered that petitioner will not be arrested till february 23, 2013 subject to any decision in his application pending before the additional ..... a similar application is finally adjudicated upon by a lower court. but since there are chances of resolving of the matrimonial controvers.before the mediation and conciliation centre on an unconditional offer of the petitioner to resume cohabitation, it is deemed appropriate to give a fair opportunity to the ..... feasible for him to appear before the mediation and conciliation centre and express his bonafide intention to resume cohabitation with his wife complainant. heard. legally a petition under section 438 cr.p ..... alongwith him, it is expedient in the interest of justice that he should accompany his parents at the time of mediation to make a bonafide offer to the complainant to accompany him. since the petitioner does not have any interim relief, it will not be ..... the petitioner is pending before this court and that the parents have been directed to appear before crm m-4377 of 2013 [2].the mediation and conciliation centre of punjab and haryana high court on february 22, 2013. since the petitioner is ready to reconcile and take the complainant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2013 (HC)

Debjit Dutta Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-18-2013

..... and 6.7.2013. in case of petitioner doing so, he will be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. petitioner, thereafter, would appear before the mediation and conciliation centre of punjab and haryana high court on 8.7.2013. notice be issued to respondent no.2 debarati roy @ dutta daughter of shri amit roy, resident of ..... mediation and conciliation centre to enable her to meet the travelling and misc. expenses. for awaiting the result of mediation to come up on the date fixed. this order will not, in any manner, prejudice the rights of the investigating agency ..... house no.865/5, ground floor, gali no.5, patel nagar, gurgaon, haryana, to appear before the mediation and conciliation centre on said date. petitioner will pay a sum of ` 25,000/- to the complainant on her appearance before the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Sandeep Goyal Advocate Vs. Surjeet Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-22-2013

..... any fraud, coercion or undue influence. i and my husband have resolved our differences and decided to bring the marriage to an end in terms of compromise recorded before the mediation and conciliation centre, punjab and haryana high court, on 15.02.2012. i stand by my affidavit dated 17.07.2012. i have not changed my mind and i am ..... any fraud, coercion or undue influence. i and my wife have resolved our differences and decided to bring the marriage to an end in terms of compromise recorded before the mediation and conciliation centre, punjab and haryana high court, on 15.02.2012. i stand by my affidavit dated 19.07.2012. i have not changed my mind and i am ..... all the disputes and differences in this regard have been amicably settled by the parties hereto through the f.a.o.not m-126 of 2011 -5- process of conciliation/mediation.14. that the parties undertake to abide by the terms and conditions set out in the agreement and not to dispute the same hereinafter in future. . the compromise was duly ..... failed to prove the allegations of cruelty. aggrieved by judgment and decree, dated 05.04.2010, sudesh kumari, filed an appeal. during pendency of the appeal, parties appeared before the mediation and conciliation centre of the punjab and haryana high court and arrived at a compromise in the following terms:- 1. the parties have decided to part ways by getting divorce .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora Advocate Vs. Ravinder Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-19-2013

..... the supreme court could come within the ambit of conduct. in my opinion these two judgments would not help the case of the petitioner. no doubt the agreement before the mediation is legally enforceable, more so since the parties have acted upon it. however, it would be too far fetched to term any deviation therefrom as a contempt of court. as ..... judge, family court and another reported as air 201.allahabad 107 wherein the allahabad high court held that some legal sanctity would have to be attached to the proceedings of mediation. second judgment relied upon is in the case of maninderjit singh bitta v. union of india and others reported as 2012 air sc (cri) 326 in which the hon'ble ..... for permanent alimony, maintenance, stree dhan etc.the petitioner duly paid that amount. another condition was that the respondent shall not claim the custody of the minot child. after the mediation proceedings the parties did dissolve their marriage by a decree of divorce by way of mutual consent, however, thereafter the respondent filed a petition for custody of the minot child ..... reported in the digest?. ajay tewari, j. (oral).this petition has been filed claiming that the matrimonial dispute between the petitoner and his wife was sent for mediation by this court and in the mediation proceedings it was decided that the parties would dissolve their marriage by a decree of divorce by way of mutual consent. one of the conditions was that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2013 (HC)

Jawahar Lal Chug Vs. the State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-08-2013

..... out of matrimonial dispute. the affected parties have sorted out their disputes and effected a compromise. the statement of respondent no.2/complainant has already been recorded by the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court. the copy of the said statement is available on the file bearing criminal misc. not m-22756 of 2013, which has been taken up ..... respondent no.2/complainant, ritika khurana, was recorded in criminal misc. not m-22756 of 2013. the copies of the statements and the report have been received from the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court and the same are placed on the file of criminal misc. not m-22756 of 2013 which is also fixed for today before this ..... parshad makhija & others versus the state of haryana & anr . was also referred to the director, mediation and conciliation centre for recording the statements of sharma seema s 2013.08.13 09:58 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh criminal misc. not ..... proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise. vide order dated 06.08.2013, this court had directed respondent no.2/complainant and the petitioner to appear before the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court for making their respective statements with regard to the compromise. another petition bearing not criminal misc. not m- 22756 of 2013 titled as ram .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //