Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: rajasthan Page 12 of about 2,907 results (0.012 seconds)

Feb 27 1998 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Girdhari Lal and Etc.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1998Raj240; 1998(3)WLC76; 1998(1)WLN216

..... that the arbitral tribunal remains within the limits of its jurisdiction; (iv) to minimize the supervisory role of courtsin the arbitral process: (vi) to permit an arbitral tribunals to use mediation, conciliation or other procedures during the arbitral proceedings to encourage settlement of disputes; (vii) to provide that every final arbitral awardis enforced in the same manner as if it were .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 1986 (HC)

Amb Singh and anr. Vs. Sub-divisional Officer and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1986(1)WLN418

milap chand jain, j.1. this writ petition is directed against the order of the board of revenue dated october 27, 1978 (anx. 4) whereby the board of revenue allowed the revision and set aside the order of the revenue appellate authority dated october 20, 1975 (anx. 2) and restored the order of the learned sdo dated may 31, 1975 (anx. 1). the sub-divisional officer, dhinmal decided the petitioners ceiling ease by his order anx. 1. he recorded that the portion is recognisable and acceptable but as the petitioners being the co-tenants are entitled to equal shares. on that basis the sub-divisional officer determined the ceiling area of the petitioners. each of the petitioners was entitled to 37.12 standard acres considering the number of members of the family of jaisingh as 3, he found that no part of share of his land is resumable whereas the number of the family members of the petitioner amb singh was less than five so he found that 7.12 standard acres land is resumable. consequently he ordered that 51 bighas 1 biswa land as specified in his order shall vest in the state government in accordance with the option. the revenue appellate authority on separate appeals preferred by the petitioners in view of the partition effected between the petitioners found that no land of petitioner jaisingh is liable to be resumed as the land in his possession, is not in excess of the ceiling area whereas 23 bighas 1 biswas land of petitioner ambsingh is liable to resumed of the kharas. nos. 108 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 2006 (HC)

Kundan Singh Vs. Shri Pustimargiya Tritya Peeth Pranayas and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(3)Raj1851

..... the surrounding circumstances including the fact that if oral agreement was entered into between the parties then whether it was in presence of any person and if there was any mediator who was he and what negotiations took place and if the agreement was acted upon then all the material particulars ; how it was acted upon which includes the writing of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 2006 (HC)

Smt. Neni and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2006CriLJ4527; RLW2007(1)Raj330

..... and to take them to the residence of p.w. 9 jasraj, elder brother of khetidas at about 1.30 p.m. in the same night. these people wanted to mediate for amicable settlement between the accused and the complainant in lieu of which the accused offered some money also so that the complainant party may not pursue the police case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 2006 (HC)

TajuddIn (Deceased) Through Lr. Vs. FaqruddIn (Deceased) Through Lr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(1)Raj449

narendra kumar jain, j.1. the plaintiff has filed this regular first appeal under section 96 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 against the judgment and decree dated 31st of january, 1981 passed by the additional district judge, no. 1 jaipur city, in civil suit no. 67/1977, whereby the suit of the plaintiff for declaration permanent injunction and possession was dismissed.2. brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that on 13th of december, 1976 the plaintiff filed a suit in the lower court wherein it was prayed that a decree of declaration in favour of the plaintiff be passed declaring him sajjadanashin and mutwali of dargah hazrat ziauddin sahib situated near moti katla, outside chaardarwaja in jaipur city. a prayer for decree of possession was also made in respect of the properties which are in occupation of the defendants. it was also prayed that the defendants be restrained by a decree of permanent injunction not to interfere in the property of dargah erected on khasra nos. 497 to 503.3. the plaintiff, in his plaint, pleaded that there is one well known dargah, namely, hazrat mian ziauddin and the plaintiff is its sajjadanashin, the defendants are in habit to quarrel with the plaintiff about their rights in the dargah. the pedigree was given in para 1 of the plaint. it was pleaded that jaipur his highness had gifted seven bigha of land in khasra nos. 497 to 503 in jaipur city to hazrat mian ziauddin sahib, for the use of residence and for laying down a garden around. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2000 (HC)

Lrs. of Raghunath Singh Vs. Board of Revenue for Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN107

j.c. verma, j.1. the petitioner is challenging the impugned orders passed by the assistant collector dated 18.11.1976 (annex-6), revenue appellate authority dated 12-4.1982 (annex-7) and board of revenue dated 9.12.1982 and 20.12.1982 (annexs-9 and 10).2. it is stated that one thakur ram singh son of thakur kishan singh, resident of village bhankhari tehsil rajgarh, real uncle of the petitioner had bequeathed all his properties (movable or immovable) in favour of the petitioner by a registered will dated 26.11,1965. the testator died on 9.1.1996. mutation of the agricultural lands comprising of khasra nos. 42, 44, 46 and 48 was also sanctioned in favour of the petitioner.3. one hari singh, brother of the petitioner claimed to be adopted son of the testator. hari singh has since died and the respondent nos. 4 to 8 are legal representatives of hari singh. he also produced a will and, therefore, the petitioner. filed a suit for permanent injunction against him u/s 188 of the rajasthan tenancy act in the court of assistant collector, rajgarh along with the application u/s 212 of the rajasthan tenancy act. a receiver was appointed by the orders of the court on 18.4.1968. the petitioner had filed another suit in regard to the residential house left by thakur ram singh, basing his claim on the same will. respective issues were framed as claimed. the suit in regard to house was decreed in favour of the plaintiff petitioner on 15.1.1973 vide annex. 4. on the appeal being filed by hari .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2001 (HC)

Prakash Mal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2002Raj190; 2002(5)WLC90; 2002(4)WLN398

orderbhagwati prasad, j. 1. the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner in the background that there was an agriculture hold-ing owned by one jethu singh s/o tej singh in khasara no. 759 measuring 12, 14 bighas situated at kheme ka kuan. jethu singh was holder of khatedari rights of this land. the said khatedar sold his rights in favour of respondent no. 3 by a registered sale deed. after sale, the aforesaid land came to be vested in respondent-samiti. a mutation was entered in the name of society through mutation no. 554. in the revenue record, in place of jethu singh, respondent no. 3 samiti was entered as khatedar. respondent no. 3 was constituted as housing cooperative society having its registered no.1188/q.2. the respondent no. 3 society made available plot no. 11 measuring 600 sq. yards (60 fts. x 90 fts) to one khushal singh, a member of the society vide annexure 1. the land was not converted and was allot-ted as agricultural land only. according to the petltitioner. it was mentioned in the allotment letter that conversion and development charges are to be borne by the member itself. the said khushal singh made an application for conversion of plot no. 11 measuring 600 sq. yards. the application presented by khushal singh was processed in accordance with law. the respondent trust has given its no objection for its conversion and the prescribed authority after fulfilment of all the requirements converted agricultural and into urban land by the order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2001 (HC)

Chandra Devi and anr. (Smt.) Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1075; RLW2003(3)Raj1985; 2002(1)WLC685

..... it is established that soon before her death geeta devi was wither treated with cruelty or harassed with the demand of dowry.9. phool chand (pw. 3) who was the mediator in arranging the marriage of geeta devi with appellant jai singh, stated in his cross examination that no demand of dowry was made at the time of marriage and in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 2008 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Rent Tribunal and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(3)Raj1947

..... arbitral procedure which is fair and capable of meeting the needs of specific arbitration and minimizing the supervisory role of the court and to permit the arbitral tribunal to use mediation; but, at the same time, the prayer for reference can be made if the subject-matter in question before the court is enumerated in the clause for arbitration in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 1973 (HC)

Permanand and anr. Vs. Smt. Anandi Bai and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1974Raj65; 1973()WLN643

..... the band of another person, or that if another person does sign it on the addressee's behalf the presumption is thai it never was delivered to the addresser himself mediately of immediately for instance', if a servant in the addressee's house saw a notice handed in by the postman carried to the addressee, and handed to him that servant .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //