Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: rajasthan Page 8 of about 2,907 results (0.011 seconds)

May 31 2002 (HC)

Motilal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2003(1)WLN197

arun madan, j.1. the fact concisely stated are that in ceiling proceedings initiated against motilal (petitioner herein) in respect of his agricultural land situated in village raithal, tehsil mangrol district kota, (now in district baran), 30 bighas & 18 biswas of his land was declared surplus vide order dt. 22.1.1979, thereby motilal submitted option to surrender 30 bighas & 18 biswas of land out of khasra no. 9 of his village raithal, to which mathuralal (respondent no. 5, herein) raised objection stating that he had purchased the land in dispute in the year 1958 and so it was an encumbered land. but, the assistant collector baran, after having considered respondent no. 5's objections and heard the petitioner rejected the objections vide his order dt. 28.2.1981 (ann.a), and directed the tehsildar mangrol to take possession of the land in dispute. against order (ann.a) rejecting objections, the respondent no. 5 preferred an appeal but it was dismissed by the additional collector (ceiling) kota vide order dt. 27.12.1982 (ann.b), resulting in filing second appeal by the respondent no. 5 before the revenue board, which by its order dt. 25.8.1988 (ann.c) accepted the second appeal while setting aside orders (ann. a & b) of the authorised officer and the appellate authority (ceiling) and accordingly the asstt. collector (authorised officer) was directed to acquire unencumbered land in lieu of the land in dispute which stood transferred in favour of mathuralal.2. however, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 1999 (HC)

Bachan Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1999CriLJ1952

orderg.l. gupta, j.1. this petition is directed against the order dated 30-7-1998 passed by the addl. chief judicial magistrate, karanpur whereby he directed framing of the charge under section 120b, 467, 468 and 199, ipc against petitioners bachan singh alias ranjeet singh, hardeep singh, umed singh and others and under section 120b, and 199, ipc against petitioner suba sadiq.2. mr. samdariya contended that hardeep singh was 'panch' and suba sadiq was 'sarpanch' and umaid singh was patwari at the relevant time and as such they were public servants and could not be prosecuted without the sanction of the state government under section 120b, cr.p.c. and charges could not be framed against them. his further contention was that bachan singh, petitioner himself is the son of bhag singh in whose name the land stood and he being the rightful claimant of the property, charges could not be framed against him also.3. i have gone through the order of the trial court as also the papers which have been made available by mr. samdariya. the facts of the case are slightly complicated. jito d/o bhag singh lodged are port at police station keshrisinghpura with the allegations that her father bhag singh was a refugee. he was allotted some 24 bighas of land in chak s.k. murabba no. 72, in his name and in the name of her mother kartaro and brother nathu ram for which mutation entry no. 68 was made in the record. thereafter her father, mother and brother died. she, therefore, applied for mutation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 1968 (HC)

Bhopal Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1968Raj305; 1968CriLJ1572

..... the accused bhanwarsingh and the deceased bhoorsingh bv his intervention inderstngh, second son of bhoorsingh, was asked by chhatusingh to bring bhoorsingh from the post office so that he may mediate between the parties and bring abuut a compromise between bhoorsinghand bhanwarsingh. meanwhile chhatu-singh sat down in the kotari of bhanwar singh. the prosecution case is that at that time ..... of section 149. indian penal code.it is true that all the accused reside in the same gowadi and the possibility of their coming to the spot to witness the mediation by chhatu singh or to see what had actually happened cannot be ruled out. i have looked into the statements of the eye witnesses p w 4 san-watsingh, p .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 1958 (HC)

Bhaironlal Vs. Doongarsidas and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1959Raj250

dave, j.1. this is an appeal by bhaironlal under section 116a of the representation of the people act, (no. 43 of 1951) which will hereinafter be referred as the act,against the judgment of the election tribunal, jaipur,dated 31-1-1958.2. the facts giving rise to it are that in the general ejections, which were held in 1957 for membership of the rajasthan assembfy, one of the constituencies, namely, jamua ramgarh, was a double member constituency. for the general seat there were three contesting candidates, i.e., bhaironlal (appellant), doongarsidas (respondent no, 1) and one fateh singh. respondent no. 1 got the maximum number of votes and so he was declared elected. the appellant and fateh singh were defeated. fateh singh is not a party to this appeal.for the reserved seat, there were only two candidates and respondent no. 2 ramlal defeated his rival chhaganlal. the appellant challenged the validity of the election of respondent no. 1 only. in the petition which was filed by him he had raised two objections. the first objection was that the nomination paper of respondent no. 1 (doongarsidas) was wrongly accepted since he was holding office of profit under the government of rajasthan as a 'meena bara gaon'. his next contention was that the nomination paper of one shri narain was wrongly rejected. the second objection was abandoned by the petitioner at the time of final arguments before the election tribunal. it has not been raised in the memorandum of appeal and therefore .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 2005 (HC)

Laxmi NaraIn @ Latoor Vs. the State of Raj. and Ladu

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2005(3)Raj1678; 2005(3)WLC780

..... ran away from there, then they started beating us. ladies were also beaten and they drove the tractors towards us to kill us. then to mediate, prabhata, ramchandra gurjar, narain, harsai etc. came there and mediated with great difficulty. if these persons had not been there then our so many persons would have been crushed and killed by tractors. these persons had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1997 (HC)

Munna Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1997CriLJ3095; 1998(1)WLC575; 1997(1)WLN367

..... 406, 420, ipc, which is presently under our consideration, the informant alleged that on november 19, 1994 the three persons named in the fir including the present petitioner, through their mediator, bandoo khan by name, dishonestly and fraudulently obtained rs.10,000/- from her towards alleged outstanding dues on account of rent due upto october 1994 though they had regularly received ..... singh to act accordingly (annexure-5). the receipt dated 28-9-94 evidences that the tenant-informant had paid rs. 10,000/- towards rent payment of her liability to the mediator sri bundoo khan, (annexure-4). annexure 3 is a letter written by the sho to fazlur rehman directing him to appear before the superintendent of police on 19-11 -94 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 1987 (HC)

Genia and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1987WLN(UC)576

milap chandra, j.1. this is an appeal against the judgment of the learned sessions judge, jalore dated 18-7-78 by which he convicted the accused appellants as under: name of the convictions. no. appellant under section sentences of the ipc 1 2 3 4(1) narayan 147 ri for 1-1/2 years; 148 ri for 2 years; 342 ri for 6 months; 454 ri for 3 years and fine of rs.500/- in default further ri for 3 months; 495 ri for 4 years and fine of rs. 2000/- in default further ri for 6 months;(2) hema ) 147 ri for 1-1/2 years;(3) verma)(4) geoa ) 342 ri for 6 months; 454 ri for 3 years and fine of rs. 500/- in default further ri for 3 months; 395 ri for 4 years and fine of rs. 2000/-, in default further ri for 6 months;(5) harda 147 ri for 1-1/2 years; 1 2 3 4(6) bagta 454 ri for 3 years and fine of rs. 5000/- in default further ri for 3 months; 395 ri for 4 years and fine of rs. 2000/- in default further ri for 6 months;(7) lakha) 147 ri for 1-1/2 years.(8) kesa ) ' ' '(9) sawa ) ' ' '(10) kalia) ' ' '2. the prosecution case may be briefly summarised thus. at about 10 a.m. on 7-10-1975, the accused-appellants along with 30 other persons formed an unlawful assembly with the common object of committing dacoity in field, bearing khasra no. 591 situated in village hema gudha (sanchore). in pursuance thereof, they came armed with gun, kulharis, lathis and dharias in three tractors. they tied the hands of harchand pw 12 and meera pw 11, broke open the iron box and took away 'bajri sattis' and also .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2001 (HC)

Ram Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2001Raj381

r. balia, j. 1. heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. this writ petition which has been referred to division bench as a public interest litigation is to challenge annexure-9 dt. 22nd august, 1998 by which the land allotted to school on 6-10-95 was cancelled and declared as a government land and thereafter the said land has been allotted to respondents nos. 6, 7 and 8. the allotment made in favour of the school was cancelled on a review petition filed by respondent no. 7, surendra kumar s/o shri udami ram. 3. the chequered history of the case shows that the respondents nos. 6, 7 and 8 through an indigenous device indirectly obtained the allotment of the very same land which was made in favour of the school and earlier litigation to secure that land by brother of respondents nos. 6 and 7 and the respondent no. 8 labh singh himself has failed before this court. 4. the genesis of present controversy dates back to 1974, in chak 4 snm, tehsil hanumangarh in district sri ganganagar, three bighas of land bearing killa nos. 14, 17 and 24 were allotted for a primary school by the order of collector, ganganagar dt. june 3, 1974. prithvi raj s/o shri udami ram, and brother of respondents no. 6 and 7 along with labh singh alleging himslf to be adopted son of shri modan singh and real son of pola singh, and pola singh himself filed a review application against the said allotment on the ground their land was adjoining to the aforesaid land which was allotted for the primary school and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2008 (HC)

Ram Rai Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(2)Raj1674

mahesh bhagwati, j.1. challenge in this appeal is to the judgment and order of conviction dated 21st february, 1986, whereby the special judge anti corruption cases jaipur convicted the accused appellant ram rai s/o shri narain lal by caste balai, r/o of niwai in the offences under section 161 of ipc and section 5(l)(d)(2) of prevention of corruption act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as act 1947) and sentenced him as under:under section 161 of ipcone year rigorous imprisonment.section 5(l)(d)(2) of prevention of corruption act, 1947one year rigorous imprisonment and a fine of rs. 200/- and in default of payment of fine to further suffer rigorous imprisonment of two months. both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.2. the nub of the prosecution story as unfolded by pw.l abdul aziz is as under: that on 9th april, 1980 the complainant pw-1 abdul aziz submitted a complaint ex. p/l to dy. s.p. anti corruption department, ajmer stating that the accused ram rai land records officer tehsil devi, district tonk, has solicited for a bribe of rs. 200 for mutation of his land. he has no intention to pay the gratification to the land record inspector, hence necessary action should be taken. the complainant also stated that having settled the time and the place for giving this bribe amount to the accused, he shall again come on 10th april, 1980. since the complainant could not manage 200 rupees, he approached the dy. s.p. a.c.d. on 11th april, 1980 and apprised the dy. s.p. that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 2000 (HC)

Raman Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2001CriLJ800; 2001(2)WLC632; 2000(3)WLN39

..... telephonic talks with co-accused phootar mal and mr. sanjeev r. bhatt and some of his phone-calls had also been taped. one narain singh kharabera played a role of mediator and after taking all care and precautions, an agreement was signed between co-accused phootar mal and mohan lal - the original tenant - partner of the complainant's brother for vacating .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //