Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: rajasthan Year: 1987 Page 1 of about 61 results (0.012 seconds)

Apr 01 1987 (HC)

Makhan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-01-1987

Reported in : 1987(2)WLN100

..... not conducted number of cases or number of sessions trials is not libellous by itself but to say that she cannot cross examine or she acts as an agent or mediator between the judge and the clients for illegal gratification, these allegations are definitely libellous. if such statements are made against an advocate by any person even if in a transfer ..... a practising advocate that she cannot cross-examine the witnesses which is per se defamatory. the allegation made against the advocate that it is alleged that she works as a mediator or agent between the clients and the judge to secure a judgment or an order in favour of a particular party on account of illegal gratification is also libellous. the ..... -examine the witnesses properly and so, actually, the sessions judge has acted as a defence counsel. it was further alleged in that application that smt. manju pande acts as a mediator of shri r.s. verma for settlement of illegal deals about the decision of cases. this allegation has been made on account of certain complaints made against shri k.s .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 1987 (HC)

Genia and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-18-1987

Reported in : 1987WLN(UC)576

milap chandra, j.1. this is an appeal against the judgment of the learned sessions judge, jalore dated 18-7-78 by which he convicted the accused appellants as under: name of the convictions. no. appellant under section sentences of the ipc 1 2 3 4(1) narayan 147 ri for 1-1/2 years; 148 ri for 2 years; 342 ri for 6 months; 454 ri for 3 years and fine of rs.500/- in default further ri for 3 months; 495 ri for 4 years and fine of rs. 2000/- in default further ri for 6 months;(2) hema ) 147 ri for 1-1/2 years;(3) verma)(4) geoa ) 342 ri for 6 months; 454 ri for 3 years and fine of rs. 500/- in default further ri for 3 months; 395 ri for 4 years and fine of rs. 2000/-, in default further ri for 6 months;(5) harda 147 ri for 1-1/2 years; 1 2 3 4(6) bagta 454 ri for 3 years and fine of rs. 5000/- in default further ri for 3 months; 395 ri for 4 years and fine of rs. 2000/- in default further ri for 6 months;(7) lakha) 147 ri for 1-1/2 years.(8) kesa ) ' ' '(9) sawa ) ' ' '(10) kalia) ' ' '2. the prosecution case may be briefly summarised thus. at about 10 a.m. on 7-10-1975, the accused-appellants along with 30 other persons formed an unlawful assembly with the common object of committing dacoity in field, bearing khasra no. 591 situated in village hema gudha (sanchore). in pursuance thereof, they came armed with gun, kulharis, lathis and dharias in three tractors. they tied the hands of harchand pw 12 and meera pw 11, broke open the iron box and took away 'bajri sattis' and also .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 1987 (HC)

Smt. Mohan Kanwar Ranawat and ors. Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-30-1987

Reported in : 1(1988)WLN(Rev)104

milap chandra, j.1. this writ petition has been filed challenging the judgment of the respondents no. 1 to 3 dated 31-12-1971 (annexure 3), 7-3-1975 (annexure 4) and 6-10-1976 (annexure 5) respectively by which the transfers of the agricultural land made by the petitioner no. 1 in favour of the petitioners no. 3, 4 and 5 were not recognised under section 30dd, rajasthan tenancy act (here in after to be called as 'the act') and the separate share of late mohan kanwar jagtawatji, mother of the petitioner no. 2, was also not recognised while calculating the extent of ceiling area under section 30-c of the act. the facts of the case giving rise to this writ petition may be summarised thus.2. raisingh, husband of the petitioner no. 1, had khatedari land measuring 1347 bighas 9 biswas, more specifically described in schedule 'a' of the writ petition. he died on 13-2-1958. in november 1971, proceedings under section 30-c of the act and rules 9 and 10, rajasthan tenancy (fixation of ceiling on land) (government) rules, 1963 (here in after to be called as 'the rules') for the determination of the ceiling area were taken against the petitioner no. 1 by the respondent no. 3. the petitioner no. 1 filed objections stating that several bighas of land had been transferred to various purchasers and the co-widow of late raisingh, mohan kanwar jagtawat, had also equal share in the land left by the deseased. the transfers made in favour of the petitioners nos. 3 to 5 and separate share of mst. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 1987 (HC)

Smt. Mohan Kanwar Ranawat Vs. Board of Revenue

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-30-1987

Reported in : 2(1989)WLN(Rev)412

milap chandra, j.1. this writ petition has been filed challenging the judgment of the respondents nos. 1 to 3 dated 31-12-1971, (annexure-3), (annexure 4) and 6-10-1976 (annexure-5) respectively by which the transfers of the agricultural land made by the petitioner no. 1 in favour of the petitioner nos. 2, 3, 4 & 5 were not recognised under section 30-dd, rajasthan tenancy act (here in after to be called as 'the act') and the separate share of late mohan kanwar jagtawatji, mother of the petitioner no. was also not recognised while calculating the extent of ceiling area under section 30-c of the act. the facts of the case giving rise to this writ petition may be summarised thus.2. baisingh, husband of the petitioner no. 1, had khatedari land measuring 1347 bighas, 9 biswas, more specifically described in schedule 'a' of (be writ petition. he died on 13-2-1958. in november 1971, proceedings under section 30-c of the act and rules 9 and 10, rajasthan tenancy (fixation of ceiling on land) (government) rules, 1963 (here in after to be called as 'the rules'; for the determination of the ceiling area were taken against the petitioner no. 1 by the respondent no. 3. the petitioner no. 1 filed objections stating that several bighas of land bad been transferred to various purchasers and the co-widow of late raisingh, mohan kanwar jagtawat, had also equal share in the land left by the deceased. the transfers made in favour of the petitioners nos. 3 to 5 and separate share of mst. mohan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 1987 (HC)

Amiya and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-25-1987

Reported in : 1987(2)WLN42

shyam sunder byas, j.1. amiya and mst. madi the appellants, were convicted under sections 302 and 201, ipc and each was sentenced to imprisonment for life on the first count and three years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of rs. 100/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo four month' rigorous imprisonment on the second count by the learned additional sessions judge (1), jodhpur by his judgment dated november 8, 1976. they have come-up in appeal and challenged their conviction.2. briefly recounted, the facts and circumstances leading to the prosecution and conviction of the appellants may be summed-up as under: baldeo bhat had two wives smt. madi and smt. magni. he was residing with them in village gajsinghpura, he passed away two or three years before august, 1975. his widows continued to live together in the same house, but the mutation of his fields was entered separately in favour of each. smt. magni, aged about 35 years at the time of her murder, had no issue while smt. madi (the appellant) has two daughters. smt. sayri and smt. jetabai by name. smt. sayri is married to the appellant amiya while jetabai is married to one banshi. accused amiya has a son by name gopiya. smt. madi, aged about 70 years in 1975, wanted to adopt gopiya as the son. smt. magni, however, opposed this proposed adoption. smt. madi and amiya therefore, took smt. magni as a hurdle in the proposed adoption and hatched a plan to finish her for ever.3. on august 25, 1975, some persons of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1987 (HC)

Smt. Hawa Kanwar and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-02-1987

Reported in : 1987(2)WLN52

narendra mohan kansliwal, j.1. this special appeal is directed against the judgment of learned single judge dated april 11, 1978, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants.2. brief facts of the case are that the collector, jaipur, issued a notice to rao dhir singh an ex-jagirdar of shahpura that an amount of rs. 1,43,307.60 p. was due against him on account of tribute, lagan khalsa, district board case and matmi charges. by this notice dated july 6, 1970, rao dhir singh was asked to deposit the afore-mentioned amount in the treasury and in case he had any objection then he could file the same with documents within 15 days. this notice was followed by reminders dated november 13, 1970, and april 2, 1971. rao dhir singh filed a writ petition to quash and set aside the notice dated july 6, 1970 as well as the two reminders issued by the collector dated november 13, 1970 and april 2, 1971 and to prohibit the respondents to take any other proceedings in consequence of the above notice and reminders.3. the case of the petitioner was that he was jagirdar of thikana shahpura, which was resumed by the government on august 11, 1954. any dues against the jagir could have been recovered from the amount of compensation awarded to the erstwhile jagirdar in accordance with section 46 read with section 34(i) and section (c) of the rajasthan land reforms and resumption of jagir act, 1952 (here in after referred to as the jagir act'). it was further alleged that on resumption of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 1987 (HC)

Ram Bharose Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-21-1987

Reported in : 2(1989)WLN(Rev)436

i.s. israni, j.1. these 3 special appeals filed under section 18 of the rajasthan high court ordinance arise out of the same order of the learned single. judge dated february 17, 1986, therefore, all the 3 appeals are disposed of by ibis one judgment.2. the subject matter of the dispute is the property known as chota ramdwara, situated near diggi house, jaipur. there are other two gfants also in village bhawani shuckerpura aisd aakodiya. the state government issued a notification under section 21 of the rajasthan land reforms and resumption of jagir act, 1952 (hereinafter called as 'the act') and appointed 01-07-1963 as the date of resumption of all jagir lands with an annual income below rs. 1,000/- according to the original grant and the income of which is utilized for maintenance of any place of worship. when the possession of the grant chbota ramdwara was not delivered to the state government, steps for taking over possession were taken by the government in the year 1966, which was challenged by the respondent mahant ram swaroopin d.b. civil writ petition no. 958/66, before this court. this writ petition of mahant ram swaroop was accepted on 10-07-1967 on the ground that before taking possession of the property resumed, the state government has not followed the procedure prescribed under the act and the rules it was further observed by this court that the state government will be at liberty to take any action according to law, but the property cannot be resumed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 1987 (HC)

Jugal Kishore Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-09-1987

Reported in : 1988(1)WLN542

k. bhatnagar, j.1. this appeal is directed against the judgment passed by the learned sessions judge, bikaner on april 5,1977 by which appellant jugal kishore was convicted for the offence under section 302, ipc and sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of rs. 200/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo six months r.i.2. the prosecution case is that on august 6, 1976 at 11.00 a.m. appellant jugal kishore with a knife in his hand and his clothes stained with blood, went to the police station, sadar, bikaner and lodged me report ex. p 32. that report was in a way confession of the appellant for commuting the murder of his wife because of quarrel between the two. kushal chand (pw 12), station house officer of the police station arrested the appellant vide memo ex. p 8 and recovered ex. p 2 knife from his possession vide ex p 9. the accused was kept in custody there. as the appellant had one injury on his knee he was sent to hospital for medical examination. dr. bhaira ram (pw 8), medical jurist, p.b.m. hospital, bikaner noted one injury with sharp edged weapon on knee of the appellant and prepared the injury report ex. p 12. the sho sent information to kalyan mal sharma, dy. s.p. the dy. s.p. went to the site and proceeded with the investigation. kushal chand, sho also went to the site and assisted in the investigation. the d ad body of smt. shanti wife of the appellant was lying in the court yard of her house. she had injuries on her person. the injury report and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 1987 (HC)

Kewal Ram Vs. Tilok Das

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-24-1987

Reported in : 1988(1)WLN158

m.c. jain, j.1. this is an application under section 482 cr.pc against the order dated 20th july, 1981 passed by the munsif and judicial magistrate, 1st class sujangarh in criminal revision no. 3/80 under section 59 of the rajasthan panchayat act, 1953 (here in after referred to as the act) whereby the petitioner's revision was dismissed and the order of the nyaya up-samiti village luhara dated 9-5-1979 was upheld hereby the applicant was sentenced to a fine of rs. 50/- for the offence under sections 379 and 427 ipc and the petitioner was further ordered to make payment of rs. 25/- in respect of each tree total rs. 75/- by way of compensation to the complainant tilok das.2. an application was moved on 2-5-1975 by shri tilok das that 'bordi' trees have been cut and removed from his field. the accused applicant kewal ram was summoned but he did not appear. thereafter on 3-5-1975 site was inspected and the complainant was directed to produce his evidence. on the basis of the evidence and the inspection report, the petitioner was found guilty. it was also found that the accused has absconded. consequently the nyaya up-samiti village luhara found the applicant guilty of the aforesaid offences and sentenced him to fine and ordered payment of compensation as aforesaid. the applicant preferred revision petition but was unsuccessful. hence this application.3. i have heard shri a.k. rajvanshy learned counsel for the applicant and shri n.c. bhati learned public prosecutor for the state. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 1987 (HC)

Madan Singh S/O Sumer Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-09-1987

Reported in : 1988(1)WLN551

sharma, j.1. three bail applications are being deposed of by this order, namely, deena lal v. state of rajasthan s.b. cr. misc. bail application no. 3181/87, kalyan singh and ors. v. state of rajasthan s.b. cr. misc. bail application no. 3247/87 and madan singh v. state of rajasthan s.b. cr. misc. bail application no. 2878/87. all the aforesaid three bail application relate to fir no. 108/87 which was lodged in relation to one roop kanwar having committed sati along with her husband, deceased mal singh. the case of the prosecution is that smt. roop kanwar in fact did not commit sati but was burnt alive by sumer singh father of deceased mal singh and other persons who were present at the house of sumer singh and other accused petitioners were said to have actually aided in the burning of roop kanwar.2. smt. roop kanwar was married to mal singh only on january 17, 1987. mal singh all of sudden had been taken ill and said to have developed pain in the abdomen and he was admitted in the kalyan hospital, sikar on september 3, 1987 and died on september 4, 1987 in the morning at about 6.50. it is further the case of the prosecution that sumer singh, father of deceased mal singh and others took smt. roop kanwar in funeral procession while it is not the custom that ladies accompany the funeral procession. she was dressed and was having all 'shringar' and every body in the village knew when the funeral procession was passing through the market that roop kanwar is to be made a sati.3. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //