Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: rajasthan Year: 1987 Page 3 of about 61 results (0.010 seconds)

Mar 27 1987 (HC)

Board of Revenue Vs. Todar Mal JaIn and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-27-1987

Reported in : 1987(1)WLN620

gopal krishna sharma, j.1. by this reference the registry, board of revenue has moved this court to take action against todar mal jain printer and publisher, rajasthan patrika daily, editor rajasthan patrika daily, managing director, rajasthan patrika daily and local editor, rajasthan patrika for committing the offence of contempt of court.2. seven appeals were pending in the board of revenue for rajasthan ajmer and those appeals were being heard by single bench constituted by hon'ble shri shobha lal m. dashora. the arguments were heard in those appeals on 20-3-1986 and judgment was reserved in ail those cases. on 21-3-1986 a complaint was filed by shri todar mal jain, competent authority (urban land ceiling) ajmer, respondent no. 2 in all these 7 appeals. a news item also appeared in the daily news paper 'rajasthan patrika' dated 24-3-1986 at page no. 1 column 3 of the last page under the heading:. 3. the learned member of the board of revenue, shri shobha lal m. dashora, took judicial notice of the said news item and passed an order on the order-sheet on 31-3-1986 deciding that the respondents have committed offence of contempt of court. it was further directed to move the hon'ble high court under section 15(2) of the contempt of courts act, 1971 for taking necessary action against respondents. in compliance of that direction, the registry board of revenue has addressed a letter to the addl. registrar of this court and attached some annexures including the order dated 30-3- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 1987 (HC)

Guman Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-03-1987

Reported in : 1988(1)WLN260

s.s. byas, j.1. this civil special appeal under section 18 of the rajasthan high court ordinance, 1949 is directed against the judgment of a learned single judge dated november 26, 1986, by which the appellant's writ petition, challenging the validity of orders annexure-10 dated march 13, 1986 and annexure-11 dated march 31, 1986 passed by the state government was dismissed.2. briefly recounted, the material facts are that the petitioner presented a petition under article 226 of the constitution with the averments that he was the sarpanch, gram panchayat, sandwa district churu right from the year 1956 to march, 1986. on complaints being filed, an inquiry was conducted against him by the state and ultimately he was exonerated from all the charges on october 15, 1985 by the concerned hon'ble minister. the petitioner applied for the copy of the order passed by the hon'ble minister, but the same was not supplied to him. at about 8.00 a.m. on march 4, 1986, he received the telegram annexure-12 asking him to appear on march 4, 1986 before the concerned minister for panchayat rajya. he left his village by bus at 8.30 a.m. on the same day and reached jaipur at about 3.30 p.m. from the bus-stand, jaipur, he reached the rajasthan government secretariat at about 4.00 p.m. he submitted the application annexure-9 on that very day to adjourn the matter. no order was passed on it. on march 13, 1986 he was informed by the state government that a finding has been recorded against him under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 1987 (HC)

Bapu Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-23-1987

Reported in : 1987(2)WLN859

1. this appeal by the accused bapu lal is directed against the judgment of learned sessions judge, jhalawar dated 4th march, 1986 by which the appellant has been convicted under section 302, ipc and sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of rs. l,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.2. shortly stated the facts of the case are that on 13th december, 1984 at 11.30 p.m. mst. dhapu bai pw 1 lodged a report at police station aklera. it was submitted in the report that her father had come to meet her at about 6-7 p.m. the accused bapu lal came with a lathi in his hand and started fighting with her father. thereafter, the accused struck 2-3 blows on the head of her father. when the informant went to rescue her father then she was also given beating. at that time the accused devia and motia also came on the spot and told bapu accused to beat her father and to throw him in a ditch. thereafter, dhoolia, kalu, kanahiya son of bhanwar lal meena came on the spot and they intervened and took her father to their house. thereafter, the informant went to village maithoon, her father's village and narrated the incident to her mother. thereafter ram singh and son of baldev meena brought a bulluck-cart to devli and from there she along with the above persons had brought the injured in the bulluck-cart and lodged the report. it was further mentioned in the report that her husband was beating her for the last 2-3 days without any reason and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 1987 (HC)

Centuary Ecka Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-06-1987

Reported in : [1987]67STC103(Raj)

navin chandra sharma, j.1. the appellant, m/s. centuary ecka, jodhpur, is a duly registered partnership firm under the indian partnership act, 1932, having its registered office at 182, balniketan road, jodhpur, and its branch office at pali. this firm is also registered as a dealer under the provisions of the rajasthan sales tax act, 1954 (hereinafter, for short, 'the rajasthan act') as well as under the central sales tax act, 1956 (hereinafter, for short, 'the central act'). this firm is doing business in purchasing and selling of packing materials, that is, waterproof paper (bituminised paper), the pvc bags and poly propylene bags, etc., at jodhpur as well as at pali. during the financial year 1978-79, the appellant-firm effected sale of waterproof paper only worth rs. 2,32,074.50 at its head office at jodhpur and worth rs. 25,757.10 at its branch office at pali and it charged sales tax from the customers at 4 per cent treating them as packing material and deposited the tax amount accordingly with the state exchequer. during the same financial year, the appellant-firm effected sales of pvc bags worth rs. 27,353 and of poly propylene bags worth rs. 7,999.85 at jodhpur and further effected sale of poly propylene bags worth rs. 15,503.61 at its branch office at pali and charged the sales tax at the same rate of 4 per cent and deposited the tax accordingly with the government exchequer. the assistant commercial taxes officer, jodhpur, made assessment under section 10(3) of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1987 (HC)

State of Rajasthan Vs. Retired Contributory Provident Fund Holders Ass ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-11-1987

Reported in : 1987(1)WLN476

kanta bhatnagar, j.1. this appeal under section 18 of the rajasthan high court ordinance, 1959 is directed against the order dated september 3, 1985 passed by the learned single judge of this court in a writ petition under article 226 of the constitution of india filed by the respondent, the retired contributory provident fund holders' association (for short 'the association' here in after) jodhpur, against the state of rajasthan, in grievance to the denial of pension benefits to the members of the association.2. the facts material for the disposal of this appeal are that, the members of the association were employees of the erstwhile princely state of jodhpur and were the members of the contributory provident fund scheme (for short 'the c.p.f. scheme' here in after) which was prevalent in the former state of jodhpur. after the formation of rajasthan, those employees became the employees of the government of rajasthan and were governed by the rajasthan service rules, 1951 (for short 'the rules' here in after) the scheme of c.p.f. was that the employees were to give their own subscription and an amount equal there to was contributed by the government. those employees were asked to give option for pension. some of them opted for pension while others did not. those who opted for pension were placed in an advantageous position than the rest. the pay scales of the rajasthan employees were revised in the years 1961, 1966, 1969, 1971, 1976 and 1983. the increase in the pay scales .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 1987 (HC)

Sunari Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti Ltd., Sunari and anr. Vs. State of Raj ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-04-1987

Reported in : AIR1989Raj32

m.b. sharma, j.1. an important question is involved about the powers of the registrar, co-operative societies rajasthan, jaipur to order postponement of the elections of bharatpur central co-operative bank ltd. the registrar, co-operative societies rajasthan jaipur under his order dt. april 18, 1987 (annr. 5) has stayed the programme of elections of the bharatpur central cooperative bank ltd. bharatpur. it is the aforesaid order of the registrar, co-operative societies, rajasthan jaipur which is under challenge in this writ petition.2. the challenge to the aforesaidorder is on two grounds, (i) that under the rajasthan co-operative societies act, 1965 (for short, the act) and the rajasthan co-operative societies rules, 1966 (for short, the rules), the registrar of the co-operative societies rajasthan, jaipur has no jurisdiction to issue the aforesaid order annr. 5 and the same is without jurisdiction and (ii) it is not in public interest to postpone the elections and it has been so wrongly stated in the order that the election programme has been postponed in the public interest.3. the act deals with the co-operative societies in rajasthan. section 2(a) of the act defines 'bye-laws' which means the bye-laws registered or deemed to be registered under the act and for the time being in force and includes the registered amendments of such bye-laws. section 2(g) defines 'financing bank' which means a co-operative society the main object of which is to lend money to other societies .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1987 (HC)

Motilal Chunnilal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-09-1987

Reported in : 1987(2)WLN126

dwarka prasad, j.1. this is a reference by the income-tax appellate tribunal, jaipur bench, jaipur, by which the following questions of law were referred to this court for its opinion :'1. whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was right in holding that the firm was not valid and that the object of the agreement was of such a nature that, if permitted, it would defeat the public policy as contained in the provisions of the rajasthan excise act, 1950 ? 2, if the answer to the above is in the affirmative, whether the tribunal was justified in holding that the firm was not valid and, therefore, not entitled to registration under section 185 of the income-tax act, 1961 ?' 2. the government of rajasthan granted a licence for the retail sale of country liquor during the year 1966-67 at bhilwara including the shops situated at bhupalganj, gulmandi and dhanmandi, in the joint names of motilal, chunnilal and bhanwarlal, son of motilal. it appears that with a view to carry on the aforesaid business of retail sale of country liquor, the aforesaid licensees entered into a partnership with five other persons and constituted the firm, m/s. motilal chunnilal, bhilwara, consisting of the following eight partners :1. motilal, 2. chunnilal, 3. bhanwarlal, 4. smt. vijaylaxmi, wife of satishchandra, 5. poonamchand, son of gangaram, 6. bhuralal, son of devilal, 7. ram nath, son of magniram, and 8. smt. kamala, wife of mangilal. 3. on the basis of the deed of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 1987 (HC)

Chaina Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-06-1987

Reported in : 1988(1)WLN278

s.s. byas, j.1. in this petition under article 226 of the constitution, the petitioner prays for (1) quashing annexure p/8 and annexure p/9, by which the election of the members of the committee of kray vikray sahkari samiti, deedwana was postponed and (2) directions to the respondents to declare the ten persons mentioned in annexure p/10 as duly elected members of the committee.2. as per averments disclosed in the petition, respondent no. 6 hanuman singh was appointed as the election officer to conduct the election for the constitution of the committee of kray vikraya sahkari samiti, deedwana. the election officer published the notice-cum-programme of the election vide annexure 1 dated january 27, 1987. the final lists of voters (annexure 4 and annexure 5) were published on january 31, 1987. the nomination papers were to be presented between 11.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. on february 3, 1987 for eleven vacancies. in all, ten nomination papers were filed. the names of the ten candidates who had filed the nomination papers, were notified on february 3, 1987 by annexure 10. the scrutiny of the nomination papers was to take place between 10.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m. on february 4, 1987. the election officer postponed the election by this order annexure 9, which he issued at 6.10 p.m. on february 3, 1987. the election as per reason mentioned in annexure-9, was postponed on account of some order of the assistant registrar, co-operative societies, nagaur. annexure-8 is the copy of the telegram .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1987 (HC)

Sahib Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-28-1987

Reported in : 1987(1)WLN647

shyam sunder byas, j.1. the appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned additional sessions judge (i), hanumangarh dated july 28, 1981 convicting the appellant under section 302, i.p.c. and sentencing him to imprisonment for life.2. briefly stated, the prosecution case is that the deceased prithvi singh was going to village hadhai. he met the accused there. the accused was indebted to him for rs. 550/-. the deceased asked the accused to make the payment of the money. thereupon the accused took out a knife and plunged it to the deceased. as a result, the deceased fell down. he was removed to the hospital. a report of the occurrence was lodged by the deceased in the mid-night on the same day.i.e., 7-7-1980, at the police station, sangariya. the police registered a case under section 307, i.p.c. and proceeded with investigation. the deceased was removed to the hospital where, despite medical treatment, he passed away on july 10, 1980. the police added section 302, i.p.c. during investigation, the accused was arrested. before the deceased breathed his last, his dying declaration ex p. 27 was recorded by a judicial magistrate. on the information furnished by the accused, the knife was recovered. on the completion of investigation, the police submitted a challan against the accused in the court of the munsif-cum-judicial magistrate, sangariya, who, in his turn, committed the case for trial in the court of sessions. the learned additional sessions judge framed a charge .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 1987 (HC)

Bhanwar Lal and 15 ors. Vs. Municipal Board and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-13-1987

Reported in : 1987(1)WLN690

kishore singh lodha, j.1. all these 16 cases involve a common question of law and the facts involved are almost similar, therefore, they are being disposed by a common order. out of these 16 petitioners, nine petitioners, namely, prabhu singh, mangla ram, hanuman ram, satya narain, ramesh chandra, suresh kumar, shanker lal, hari singh and sohan lal are naka guards; two petitioners, namely, bhanwar lal and rajendra singh are nakedar, four petitioners, namely, arun kumar, ranjeet singh, vimal kumar and mohd. asad are sub-nakedar and one that is mohd. jahid is gajdar, who were under the employment of the municipal board, nagaur. all of them had been employed before 31-12-1984. however, their services have been terminated by a notice dated 26-8-1986 with effect from 26-9-1986 on the ground that there had been a reduction of the posts and that the initial appointment of each of the petitioners was irregular. all these notices are said to have been offered to the petitioners respectively but each one of them is said to have refused and, therefore, they were dispatched by registered post on 26-8-1986. the learned counsel for the petitioners has challenged the termination of the services of all these petitioners except the petitioner mohd. jahid, gajdar on the grounds that compliance with rule 8 of the rajasthan municipal (subordinate and ministerial services) rules, 1963 (here in after referred to as 'the rules') has not been made, that although the services of the petitioners had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //