Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Apr-20-1990
Reported in : 69CompCas93(Raj); 185ITR38(Raj)
m.b. sharma, j.1. company petitions nos. 4 of 1988 and 5 of 1988 have been filed by indo continental hotels and resorts ltd. (for short, 'the transferee-company') and hotel pink city pvt. ltd. (for short, 'transferor-company') under section 391 of the companies act, 1956 (for short, 'the act'), read with rule 57 of the companies (court) rules, 1959 (for short, 'the rules'), and company petition no. 14 of 1988 has been filed jointly by both the transferee and transferor-companies under sections 391 and 394 of the act and it has been prayed that a scheme of amalgamation of the two companies, namely, the transferee and transferor-companies be sanctioned.2. the transferee-company was incorporated under the provisions of the act on may 2, 1970, in the name of s. b. properties and enterprises ltd. however, with effect from december 11, 1982, the name of the transferee-company has been changed to indo continental hotels and resorts ltd. the registered office of the transferee-company is situated at sansar chandra marg, jaipur. the authorised share capital of the transferee-company is rs. 1,00,00,000 (rupees one crore only) divided into 10,00,000 (ten lakhs) equity shares of rs. 10 each. the issued, subscribed and paid-up capital of the transferee-company is rs. 65,00,000 (rupees sixty-five lakhs) divided into 6,50,000 (six lakhs and fifty thousand) equity shares of rs. 10 each. the objects of the transferee-company are set out in the memorandum of association annexed with company .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Dec-19-1990
Reported in : 1990(2)WLN573
b.r. arora, j.1. this revision is directed against the order dated august 11, 1986, passed by the additional chief judicial magistrate no. 3, jodhpur, by which the learned magistrate has taken cognizance against the petitioners and seven other persons.2. complainant dinesh alias pappu filed a complaint in the court of the learned additional chief judicial magistrate no. 3, jodhpur, against the present petitioners and seven other persons under sections 166, 288, 323, 337, 342, 357, 394, 440, 454, 147, 148 and 149, ipc. it was alleged in the complaint that on plot no. 17, situated near maghrajji ka tanka, mandore road, jodhpur, which was purchased by his brother, who has constructed a boundary wall and two residential rooms alongwith kitchen and latrine. the accused persons came on the site and abused him and also gave beating to him. they also demolished the construction raised by him. certain other allegations were, also, made in the complaint. the complainant has also, filed certain documents along with the complaint. the learned magistrate examined dinesh, banshi lal, ram singh and raghuveer singh under section 202, cr. pc. the learned magistrate, after considering the complaint the documents produced by the complainant and the statements recorded under section 202, cr pc of the witnesses dinesh, banshi lal, ram singh and raghuveer singh, took the cognizance against the petitioners and deo dutt, sajjan singh, roopa ram, nathu singh, pramod kumar, gordhan and binjraj singh .....Tag this Judgment!