Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: rajasthan Year: 1991 Page 1 of about 48 results (0.010 seconds)

Mar 27 1991 (HC)

Derby Textiles Ltd. Vs. Mahamantri, Derby Textiles Karmachari and Shra ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-27-1991

Reported in : (1994)IIILLJ528Raj; 1991(1)WLN256; 1991(2)WLN99

..... , the learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the standing orders are framed on the basis of a tripartite contract, in which the state govt. also acts as a mediator between the employer and the employees or their unions and the certifying officer also the appellate authority are duty bound to see that standing orders are certified only when they .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 1991 (HC)

Shiv Dayal Vs. State of Raj.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-27-1991

Reported in : 1991WLN(UC)535

farooq hassan, j.1. this appeal is directed against the judgment of special judge (acd) cases jaipur, by which, the learned judge found the appellant guilty for the offence under section 161 ipc and section 5(1)(d)(2) of pc act and passed two different sentences on the aforesaid two counts. both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.2. the brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that at the relevant time accused shiv dayal was working as patwari in circle no 27 chainpura tehsil haroti in the year 1977. on 22.8.77 radhey shyam s/o bhonriga lal lodged a written report before dy. s.p. out-post sawai madhopur alleging therein that the government had allotted 3/12 bighas land through s d.o. of agriculture land in favour of informant's father bhonriya and patta was also granted to his father. but the mutation was not done by patwari even after repeated request for about 1-1/2 year. the accused has been avoiding to enter the mutation. on this his brother ram khilari submitted an application before tehsildar 8-10 days back from the date of lodging the aforesaid report and in that application it was prayed that the patwari be directed to enter the mutation and get the same attested. on this the tehsildar had written the orders was prayed and he same, was directed to be sent to the accused-petitioner along with the original application. the tehsildar also called the report within three days. this application was given dasti to ram khilari brother of the informant. thereupon .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 1991 (HC)

Smt. Anand Kanwar Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-08-1991

Reported in : 1991(2)WLN35

inder sen israni, j.1. in all these 20 writ petitions, a common question regarding lands allotted to various petitioners, who are either ex-servicemen or their heirs, has been raised and a prayer has been made that each of the petitioners should not be dispossessed from the lands in their possession. therefore, all the above-mentioned petitions are decided by one order.2. for the sake of giving facts, which are generally common in all the petitions, reference of writ petition no. 240/83, filed by the petitioner hansraj, has been made. all the petitioners served in indian army and each of the petitioners has been given regiment no., & rank held by them. the petitioners were enrolled in december 1941-42 and served on active war front and were discharged in the year, 1944, after cessation of hostilities. during the war, many of the petitioners served abroad also. prior to april 7, 1949, there existed sovereign state of jaipur (briefly, the then jaipur state) and then his highness maharaja sawai man singh was the ruler of the said state, who wielded all sovereign powers vested in him. he appointed a representative committee to make recommendations for the purpose of rehabilitation of the ex-army personnel vide his order no. 1010/sc dated july 29, 1943. on the recommendations of the said committee, the then government of jaipur state took certain decisions vide order no. 584/sc dated may 20, 1944, which were published in jaipur gazette volume lxii no. 5393 dated june 1, 1944. in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 1991 (HC)

Smt. Anand Kanwar and Nineteen ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-08-1991

Reported in : 1992(1)WLC65; 1991(2)WLN318

inder sen israni, j.1. in all these 20 writ petitions, a common question regarding lands allotted to various petitioners, who are either ex-servicemen or their heirs, has been raised and a prayer has been made that each of the petitioners should not be dispossessed from the lands in their possession. therefore all the above-mentioned petitions are decided by one order.2. for the sake of giving facts, which are generally common in all the petitions, reference of writ petition no. 240/83, filed by the petitioner-hansraj, has been made. all the petitioners served in indian army and each of the petitioners has been given regiment no. & rank held by them. the petitioners were enrolled in december 1941-42 and served on active war front and were discharged in the year, 1944, after cessation of hostilities. during the war, many of the petitioners served abroad also. prior to april 7, 1949), there existed sovereign state of jaipur (briefly the then jaipur state) and then his highness maharaja sawai man singh was the ruler of the said state, who wielded all sovereign powers vested in him. he appointed a representative committee to make recommendations for the purpose of rehabilitation of the ex-army personnel vide his order no. 1010/sc dated july 29, 1943. on the recommendations of the said committee, the then government of jaipur state look certain decisions vide order no. 548/sc dated may 20, 1944, which were published in jaipur gazette volume lxii no. 5393 dated june 1, 1944. in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 1991 (HC)

Gyan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-26-1991

Reported in : 1991(2)WLN454

milap chandra jain, j.1. this writ petition has been filed against the order (annexure5) of the deputy secretary, revenue (gr. 1) department, government of rajasthan, jaipur dated january 28, 1981 by which 1/5th of the pension payable to the petitioner has been with held under rule 170, rajasthan service rules. the facts of the case giving rise to this writ petition may be summarised thus.2. in the year 1974, the petitioner was tehsildar cum sub registrar, revdar (sirohi). 55 bighas 7 biswas of agricultural land situated in village harni amrapura tehsil revdar (sirohi) was sold by the khatedars devisingh, bhanwar singh and lal chand for rs. 20,000/-to pabudan singh, prabhu singh and bhagwan singh, sons of the petitioner, and three sale-deeds were presented before him for registration and they were duly registered. mutation of the said agricultural land was duly effected in their favour. on october 10, 1975, charge-sheet under rule 16, rajasthan civil services (classification, control and appeal) rules, 1958 was served upon him. the collector, sirohi was appointed as enquirying officer. after taking his reply, examining the nine witnesses of the department and hearing the presenting officer and the petitioner, the collector, sirohi gave his report on april 30, 1978 holding that all charges except one are proved. meanwhile, the petitioner retired on february 28, 1978. thereatfer, show cause notice annexure 1 was issued on october 31, 1979 by the deputy secretary revenue (gr. 1) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 1991 (HC)

Krishan Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-13-1991

Reported in : 1992(2)WLC334; 1991WLN(UC)558

farooq hasan, j.1. this appeal is directed against the judgment dt. 18.5.85 passed by special judge for a.c.d. cases. jaipur, by which the appellant has been convicted and sentenced to one year's r.i. and a fine of rs. 500/- under section 5(1)(d)(r) p.c. act, in default of payment of fine to further undergo three months' r.i. and under section 161 ipc sentenced to one year's r.i. and a fine of rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo three months' r.i.2. the brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that in the year 1977, the accused-appellant was working as asstt. transport inspector in rajasthan state roadways. on 22.10.77, pw 4 madanlal sharma, the conductor, lodged a written report ex. p 6 before pw 11 manhpool singh addl. s.p. mentinoning therein that he was workingas conductor in rajasthan state roadways. he had gone on duty as conductor on jaipur-sambhar route and during the journey at boraj station shri kishan kumar asstt. transport inspector made checking and put a remark on his way bill regarding three passengers. thereafter, on 17.10.77 shri kishan kumar asstt. transport inspector again checked his bus, when all the passengers were having tickets. the appellant again checked his bus on andhi route and at that time in the bus all passengers were having tickets but that a.t.i took out 13 tickets of one rupee each 13 tickets of combination of 40 paisa each, totaling to the amount of rs. 18.20 and that was deposited by him after taking the same from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 1991 (HC)

Sheokaran and ors. Vs. Surjit Kaur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-09-1991

Reported in : 1993ACJ652

milap chandra jain, j.1. the appeal no. 58 of 1985 has been filed by the owner of the tractor no. rrk 6396, sheokaran, appeal no. 122 of 1985 has been filed by the driver gurdev singh of the bus no. rsg 3005 and appeal no. 137 of 1985 has been filed by the owner of this bus, rajasthan state road transport corporation, jaipur, against the award passed by the learned member, motor accidents claims tribunal, sri ganganagar, dated november 29, 1984, granting compensation to the claimants to the tune of rs. 2,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 9 per cent per annum. the facts of the case giving rise to these appeals may be summarised thus.2. on january 3, 1980, the claimants surjeet kaur, gurnam kaur and manjeet singh, widow, mother and son of the deceased darshan singh respectively, filed claim petition with the allegations that july 8, 1979. the same day at about 7 p.m. darshan singh had gone to padampur on bus no. rsg 3005 stopped near the office of the truck union, padampur, it was going from ganganagar to gajsinghpur and was being driven by its driver gurdev singh, late darshan singh boarded it. it started with great speed. when the bus came in front of the office of the truck union, padampur, a pipe fixed in the trolley of tractor no. rrk 6396 standing on the road struck on the head of late darshan singh. it entered in the bus through its window and it also damaged the window. he fell down there. the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the said bus .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1991 (HC)

Dalpat Singh and ors. Vs. the State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-26-1991

Reported in : 1991(2)WLC397; 1991(2)WLN178

r.s. verma, j.1. these six writ petitions have been heard together by consent of all concerned. since a very short point is involved in them, they are being disposed of at the admission stage, itself. since the questions of facts and law involved in each one of them are identical, i am disposing them by a common order.2. reply to show cause notice was filed in s.b. civil writ petition no. 1209/1991-ishwar singh and ors. v. state and ors. replies in other cases have not been filed. reply filed in s.b. civil writ petition no. 1209/1991 has been adopted by the learned government advocate in all the cases and learned counsel for petitioners in all these writ petitions agree that reply filed in ishwar singh's case may be taken as reply in the other writ petitions too. hence, the reply in ishwar singh's case has been taken as representative reply to all the writ petitions. for this very reason, i need not state the pleas raised in all the writ petitions, and a brief delineation of the averments of the petitioners in s.b. civil writ petition no. 1209/1991 may be taken as representative pleadings in all other cases.3. the case of the petitioners is that the district establishment committee, jalore, hereinafter the d.e.c., issued advertisement for filling up vacancies of teachers grade iii, existing in the upper primary schools under its jurisdiction. the petitioners, who were eligible to be appointed and possessed requisite qualifications, duly applied and were selected at an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 14 1991 (HC)

ishwar Lal Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-14-1991

Reported in : 1991(1)WLN229

b.r. arora, j.1. this revision-petition is directed against the order dated august 17,1988, passed by the sessions judge, sirohi, by which the learned sessions judge refused to frame charge under section 337, i.p.c. against the accused- respondents and sent the case back under section 228 cr. p.c. to the learned chief judicial magistrate, sirohi.2. on november 15,1985, at about 7.00 p.m. a first information report was registered at the police station, sirohi, on the statement of ishwar lal, recorded by jogsingh, assistant sub- inspector of police, in the government hospital, sirohi, wherein it was stated that on that very day, at about 7.00 p.m., when his brother kailash was repairing the tube-light, at that lime revad ram s/o shri kishan came in front of their door and asked kailash what was the matter and thereafter some altercation took-place and accused hurled abuses and went away. after sometime, he alongwith kishan, poonam, om prakash, laxman, magan s/o revad, smt. guggi w/o revad, and the wives of prem, kishan, laxman and om prakash came there armed with deadly weapons. they took-out kailash out-side the pole and started beating him with lathies. the informant was in the pole and he tried to rescue kailash. the accused, also gave beatings to the complainant. the complainant and kailash raised alarm, upon which prabhu dayal, basant, hajari, bhuri and ratan came there and rescued them. these persons, who came there to rescue kailash and ishwar, also, received injuries. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 1991 (HC)

MohiuddIn and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-22-1991

Reported in : 1991(1)WLC83; 1991(1)WLN79

v.s. dave, j.1. both these writ petitions by which the challenge has been made to the newly elected management committee, have been hotly contested, more on the ground of impropriety in filing second writ petitions after the stay was vacated in the earlier one after a chequred pendency of the same in this court. since both these writ petitions arise out of a dispute about the elections to the managing committee of islamia senior higher secondary school society (institution), sikar, they were taken up together. a preliminary objection was raised for maintainablity of the writ petitions and the same is decided by this order.2. in writ petition no. 3404/90 the petitioners have prayed that elections of respondent nos. 3,4,5, and 6 to the post of president, vice president, manager and treasurer held on 5.8.1990 be declared illegal and invalid and that a mandamus be issued directing the registrar, co-operative societies to decide the petitioner's dispute in accordance with the provisions of section 75 of the rajasthan co-operative societies act, 1965 (hereinafter re ferred to as 'the act'). it was further prayed that proceedings undertaken by respondent no.2 in validating the elections held on 5.8.1990 be also set aside.3. in s.b. civil writ petition no. 5091/90 which has another set of petitioners, it is also prayed that the election held on 5.8.1990 of respondent nos. 2,3,4 and 5 as office bearers of the new management committee of the society be set aside and further to set .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //