Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: rajasthan Year: 2004 Page 3 of about 62 results (0.037 seconds)

Sep 30 2004 (HC)

Kalu Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-30-2004

Reported in : RLW2005(2)Raj863; 2004(1)WLC45

shiv kumar sharma, j.1. prithvi singh and parbat singh, two old aged neighbours were found beheaded in the morning of october 5, 2001, police station pagaria was approached and in the course of investigation the police came to the conclusion that it was kalu singh (herein after described as 'accused') who had committed the crime. the accused was placed on trial before the learned additional sessions judge (fast track) no. 3 jhalawar in sessions case no. 74/2003. learned judge vide judgment dated august 7, 2003 convicted and sentenced the accused as under.-under section 302 ipc: to suffer imprisonment for life and fine of rs. 2000/-, in default to further suffer six months simple imprisonment. under section 459 ipc: to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and fine of rs. 500/-, in default to further suffer one month simple imprisonment.the substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently. 2. it is the prosecution case that prithvi singh had five daughters, therefore he took the accused in adoption. on the pursuation of prithvi singh, accused left the house of his original father and came with his wife to the house of prithvi singh and started residing there. soon the dreams of prithvi singh broke into pieces and he ousted the accused from the house and demanded the adoption deed back. thereafter on october 5, 2001 prithvi singh and parbat singh found dead. madan singh son of parbat singh lodged the report with the police station pagaria camp kholkheri. a case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2004 (HC)

Gobari Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-27-2004

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj1645; 2004(2)WLC52

shiv kumar sharma, j.(1). the appellant was indicted before the learned judge special court (women atricities & dowry cases) kota in sessions case no. 378/97 for having committed murder of madhu. learned judge vide judgment dated january 20, 2001 convicted and sentenced the appellant as under:-section 302 ipc to suffer imprisonment for life and finers. 2000/-, in default further suffer six monthsrigorous imprisonment.section 376 ipc to suffer ten years rigorous imprisonment andfines rs. 2000/-, in default further suffer sixmonths rigorous imprisonment.section 201 ipc to suffer three years rigorous imprisonment andfine rs. 1000/-, in default further sufferthree months rigorous imprisonment.sentences were ordered to run concurrently.(2). madhu, a girl of 16 years of age, who left her house on may 4, 1997 at 5.00 pm for jungle in order to attend the call of nature, did not return back and her half naked dead body was found lying in a trench. a written report (ex.p-5) was lodged by informant shri nath (pw.2) with the police station kanwas where a case under section 302 ipc was registered and investigation commenced. inquest report was drawn, dead body was subjected to post mortem, statements of witnesses under section 161 cr.p.c. were recorded, the appellant was arrested and injuries found on his person were examined. on the basis of information supplied by the appellant chhurri, pant, shirt and shoes were recovered and recovery memos were drawn. on completion of investigation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2004 (HC)

Kan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-26-2004

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3253; RLW2005(1)Raj90

n.n. mathur, j.1. the appellants, in these appeals, arising from the judgment dated 17-1-2002 passed by special judge, sc/st (prevention of atrocities) act cases, jodhpur convicting of offence under section 302, i. p. c. and sentenced to imprisonment for life, nowhere else but in the open jail situated in mandore, jodhpur. before giving factual matrix of the case, it would be convenient to give a prepatory note about the place of occurrence i.e. open jail.2. it is claimed that in the history of prison development in india, the establishment of open prison is the most remarkable innovation. it has opened a new vista in the realm of correctional treatment promising an offender greater freedom, natural surrounding and lesser tension which culminate in creating an atmosphere more conducive to reform himself and to achieve social, moral and economic rehabilitation in the society. the underlying philosophy of administration, mode of maintaining discipline and enforcement of orders and assessment of problems and methods of tackling them, being different from those of the closed prisons, instil a sense of self-esteem and social responsibility among prisoners and ease the pains of imprisonment to a greater extent. the government of rajasthan in exercise of powers conferred under clause (18) of section 59 prisons act, 1894 has framed the rules for sending convicts to open air camps. the preamble of the rules as provided underlying object is as follows:--'preamble.-- whereas it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 2004 (HC)

Praveen Kumar and anr. Vs. JaIn Vishva Bharati Institute and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-06-2004

Reported in : RLW2004(4)Raj2528; 2004(4)WLC219

n.p. gupta, j.1. by this writ petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the charge-sheet annexure-8 dt. 24.3.2004, so also order of expulsion, passed against the two petitioners on 31.3.2004 being annexure-9 & 10, and also seek a direction to allow both the petitioners to appear in the final examination of msw course commencing from 19.4.2004, or any other date as notified by the respondents, for the academic session 2003-2004. the directions are sought against the two respondents, being no. 1 jain vishva bharati institute (deemed university) ladnun, district nagour through its vice chancellor, and no. 2 being the registrar, jain vishva bharati institute (deemed university).2. the factual allegations are, that the institute was founded in the year 1970, with the inspiration of late acharya shri tulsi, as a centre of education, literature, culture, social service, meditation and spirituality, with a primary objective of the institute, to provide instruction, training, research, experimentation, in the fields of oriental learning, shraman culture and other related subjects. the institute is imparting education in the field of jainology, science of living and programmes in social work namely; bachelor of social work (bsw), and master in social work (msw) etc. it is alleged, that in the year 1991, by issuance of notification under section 3 of the university grants commission act, 1956, hereafter to be referred to as 'the act.' the institute was notified as deemed university. it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 2004 (HC)

Ram NaraIn and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-22-2004

Reported in : RLW2005(2)Raj851; 2005(1)WLC344

shiv kumar sharma, j.1. the appellants, five in number, were the accused on the file of learned additional sessions judge (fast track) no. 2 baran (camp chhabra) bearing sessions case no. 69/2003. learned judge vide judgment dated september 19, 2003 convicted and sentenced the appellants as under:-under section 302/149 ipc:each to suffer imprisonment for life and fine of rs. 2000/-, in default to further suffer six months simple imprisonment.under section 147 ipc:each to suffer simple imprisonment for one year and fine of rs. 500/-, in default to further suffer one month simple imprisonment. under section 447/149 ipc:each to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months and fine of rs. 500/-, in default to further suffer one month simple imprisonment.under section 148 ipc:each to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and fine of rs. 1000/-, in default to further suffer two months simple imprisonment.the substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently.2. we may state and refer to the necessary and bare facts and the relevant evidence for disposal of points involved in this appeal. on march 22, 2002 around 10-10.30 pm while rudra pratap singh had been to his house, four persons viz. pappu, prakash, ram swaroop and prem arrived and pappu told him that his brother madan lal was killed by some unknown assailants and his dead body was lying in the field. rudra pratap singh then telephonically communicated the information to police station kawai. the information was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2004 (HC)

Shankar Lal Tiwari Vs. Vaidya Ram Niwas Joshi and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-30-2004

Reported in : RLW2005(1)Raj458; 2005(1)WLC185

k.s. rathore, j.1. present petition is directed against the order dated 23.7.2001 passed by the commissioner, devasthan department in appeal no. 3/2001 filed by respondent no. 1.2. the brief facts of the case are that there is a temple of shri krishna behariji situated in purani basti, jaipur. this temple was constructed more than 100 years ago. it is allowed that the temple was constructed by the ancestors of the petitioner and the former jaipur state has sanctioned state grants in various villages for the sewapooja and for the maintenance of the temple. the last grantee in whose favour the matmi was sanctioned by the former jaipur state was tiwari govind bus, was died on 20.3.46. thereafter, the board of revenue for rajasthan, jaipur in case no. 49/matmi-jaipur of samvat 2006 vide its order dated 14.8.50 recognised ghisi lal as the successor of last grantee govind bux and sanctioned the matmi in his name.3. the commissioner, devasthan department recommended to the revenue department, which was also the administrative department of the devasthan department vide letter dated 2.9.57 that the temple in question was constructed by the ancestors of ghisi lal and asked for sanction for handing over the temple to ghisi lal and the temple was handed over to ghisi lal.4. the asstt. devasthan commissioner issued a notice under section 70 of the rajasthan public trust act 1959 and after considering the enquiry the asstt. devasthan commissioner vide order dated 6.4.88 set aside the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 2004 (HC)

Usha Dube (Mrs.) Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-21-2004

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj1653; 2004(2)WLC287

shiv kumar sharma, j.(1). the petitioner who was appointed as additional district & sessions judge in the rajasthan higher judicial services on probation, seeks to quash the order dated october 7, 1998 of the state of rajasthan whereby services of the petitioner have been dispensed with.(2). contextual facts depict that appointment of the petitioner on the post of additional district and sessions judge was made for a period of two years vide order dated august 2, 1996 and this probation period was further extended upto october 9, 1998. the order which is under challenge reads as under:-'whereas smt. usha dubey was appointed by direct recruitment in the rajasthan higher judicial service as additional district & sessions judge on probation for a period of two years vide government order no. f.19(1) (11) jud/90 dated 02.8.96 and his probation period was subsequently extended upto 09-10-98 vide government order no. f.19(11)/90 dated 29.8.98.and whereas the rajasthan high court, jodhpur, after perusing all the relevant record, has resolved that smt. usha dubey has not made sufficient use of his opportunities and has otherwise also failed to give satisfaction as a probationer in the rajasthan higher judicial service.and whereas the rajasthan high court has recommended under rule 26(1) of the rajasthan higher judicial service rules, 1969 that the services of smt. usha dubey be dispensed with, with effect from 09.10.98.now, therefore, the governor of the state in consultation with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 03 2004 (HC)

Ram Lal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jun-03-2004

Reported in : RLW2005(2)Raj2366; 2004(5)WLC181

rajesh balia, j.1. in these petitions the constitutional validity of section 3 of rajasthan co-operative societies (amendment) ordinance, 2004 has been challenged. as per section 3 of the ordinance, sub-section (2-b) has been inserted in existing section 30 of the co-operative societies act, 2001. the impugned provision provides for contingency where before expiry of the term of the elected managing committee of any society, a new committee is not constituted. in such event, it enables the govt. to direct the registrar of co-operative societies to appoint a government servant as administrator to manage the affairs of the society till a new committee is constituted provided that no member of the committee replaced by an administrator under this sub-section shall be deemed disqualified under sub-section (5) of section 28.2. under the parent act before amendment also an administrator could be appointed to take over the management of a society by removing the existing committee under section 30 (1), but in that event the members of a committee removed under section 30 become disqualified to be a member of a committee, as per section 28 (5) of the act. the act also made provision for amalgamation of two or more co-operative societies under section 13.3. the act of 2001 was reserved for consideration of the president and had received assent of the president. in view thereof, such of the provisions of act of 2001, which provides for any of the matters enumerated in sub-clauses (a) .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2004 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Saroj Devi and ors. (Smt.)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-11-2004

Reported in : III(2004)ACC366; 2006ACJ1316; RLW2004(4)Raj2305; 2004(3)WLC555

prakash tatia, j.1. heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record.2. these appeal are against the award dated 17.4,2003 of the motor accidents claims tribunal, bikaner passed in claim cases filed under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988.3. brief facts of the case are that the claimants alleged that on 8.7.1988 at about 10 p.m. victims were travelling in the three wheeler taxi rj. 07.p.0626, tola ram was driving the three wheeler taxi and when taxi reached near the chungi check post just before the municipal boundary of the bikaner, near shiv shakti gas godown, a truck no. rsf 3949 came and hit the taxi and dragged the taxi far away from the road and the truck ran over the three wheeler. the taxi went under the fuel tank of the truck. in this accident, six persons died and the driver of the taxi suffered injuries. all the seven set of the claimants including the driver of the three wheeler taxi submitted claim petitions before the motor accidents claims tribunal, bikaner. the claimants except in the claim case no. 159/98 impleaded parties to the driver and owner of the truck no. rsf 3949 as well as the united india insurance company ltd. who insured the said truck, the claimants also impleaded owner of the three wheeler and the oriental insurance company limited as parties. in the claim case no. 159/98 the claimants impleaded driver, owner of the truck and the insurance company of the truck as parties. all the claim petitions were consolidated and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2004 (HC)

In Re: Kasturi Finlease and Investment Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-12-2004

Reported in : [2004]53SCL133(Raj)

orders.k. keshote, j.1. shri a. kasliwal, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner ajanta soya limited, at the outset of his contentions, submitted that in the petition the prayer is not made for dissolution of the kasturi finlease & investment limited (hereinafter shall be referred to as 'the transferor-company'). it is only a case of merger of the transferor-company in the petitioner ajanta soya limited (hereinafter shall be referred to as 'the transferee-company').2.1 find from para no. 1 of the petition that the object of this petition is to obtain sanction of the court to the proposed scheme of amalgamation of the transferor-company with the transferee-company.3. this petition is filed under sections 391 and 394 of the companies act, 1956 by the petitioner transferee-company for grant of sanction of the scheme of amalgamation of the transferor-company in the transferee-company.4. the transferee-company filed earlier an application under sections 391 and 394 of the companies act, 1956 being company application no. 22/2003 for dispensing with the meeting of the preference shareholder of the transferee-company as the only preference shareholder of it is the transferor-company, which has already given its written consent/n.o.c. to the proposed amalgamation. in view of this fact, the court ordered that it is not necessary for convening of the meeting of the preference shareholder of the transferee-company and the prayer made for dispensing with the convening .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //