Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: rajasthan Year: 2009 Page 2 of about 56 results (0.010 seconds)

Jul 21 2009 (HC)

Nirmal Kumar Ajmera and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-21-2009

Reported in : 2009(3)WLN456

r.s. chauhan, j.1. the petitioners have challenged the notification dt. 08.01.1991, published under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 ('the act', for short) and the declaration dt. 17.04.1993, published under section 6 of the act.2. in a nutshell the facts of the case are that the petitioners are son of shri bithal das ajmera. on 27.07.1953, shri bithal das ajmera bought a piece of land falling in khasra no. 16 village vijay mahal, near jal mahal area in jaipur. the said land was initially mutated in his name. unfortunately, in 1972 both bithal das ajmera and his wife expired. since the petitioners were their surviving legal heirs, both the petitioners jointly inherited khatedari rights in the said land. the tehsildar, jaipur carried out the necessary mutation proceedings. he mutated their names in the revenue records of 15.04.1974. in order to develope the area around jal mahal and to install a ropeway from nahargarh peak to the jal mahal area, the government published a notification under section 4 of the act on 08.01.1991. it was published in the state gazette on 17.10.1991. the state government also issued and served a notice dt. 27.04.1992 in the name of bithal das ajmera. through the notice, the land acquisition officer, jda, jaipur invited objections from shri bithaldas in respect of the land measuring 1 bigha comprised in khasra no. 16. ultimately, the notice was served upon the petitioners. the petitioners submitted their initial objections on 23.05.1992 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2009 (HC)

Rajnikant Agrawal Vs. Gopali Devi Meena and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-18-2009

Reported in : RLW2010(1)Raj75

mahesh chandra sharma, j.1. this revision petition has been filed by the petitioner rajnikanth agrawal, against the order dated january 21, 2009 passed by addl. sessions judge fast track no. 1 jaipur city jaipur in criminal revision no. 19 of 2009 whereby he allowed the revision petition filed by the respondents 1 and 2 against the order dated december 12, 2008 of addl. district magistrate jaipur city (south) jaipur in case no. 5 of 2008 under section 145 cr.p.c. 2. brief facts of the case are that on october 21, 2008, the petitioner lodged an fir at police station jawahar circle jaipur, which was registered as fir no. 115 of 2008 against the non-petitioners 1 and 2. the sho police station jawahar circle sought information from the jaipur development authority regarding title of the plots in question for which fir was filed. the dy. commissioner of zone iv in the jda vide his letter dated november 7, 2008 informed that the plots no. 80, 81 and 82 are in the names of shri dharmendra gupta, vikas khetan and sanjay agrawal. brother of non-petitioner no. 2, badri prasad, was an mla and therefore under his influence the non-petitioners 1 and 2 tried to encroach upon the plots of the petitioner and they damaged the boundary wall of the plots. the non- petitioners 1 and 2 are running a school nearby the plots of the petitioner and they tried to assault the petitioner on november 12, 2008. the matter was reported to the sho police station jawahar circle. thereafter the sho ps jawahar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2009 (HC)

Ratan Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-03-2009

Reported in : 2009CriLJ4221

mahesh bhagwati, j.1. ratan lal, the appellant herein, was put to trial before additional district and sessions judge, kishangarhbas district alwar who vide judgment dated 23rd july, 1987 convicted him in the offence under section 376 read with section 511 of ipc and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for two and half years and fine of rs. 500/-; in default of payment of fine to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months.2. the prosecution case, in brief, is that on 12th june, 1986 at about 10.00 p.m. the prosecutrix was sitting in her house made of thatch and cutting unripe mangoes. in the meantime, the accused appellant ratan lal came there and asked about her husband as to where was ramesh the prosecutrix waived her hand indicating that he was not in the house. thereafter he entered inside and caught hold of by hair and made her to lie on the ground. it is alleged that he bite her right cheek and suddenly sat on her. it is further alleged that the accused broke the string of her petticoat and after lifting his trouser endeavoured to commit rape, but she suddenly changed the side. then the accused bite the wrist of her right hand by mouth. she screamed but the accused threatened her. in the meantime her husband ramesh came and the accused fled from their. the prosecutrix lodged the fir ex. p/l with police station tijara where upon the police commenced investigation.3. the investigating officer prepared the site plan ex. p/2, recorded the statements of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2009 (HC)

Prabhu Lal Vs. State of Rajathan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-03-2009

Reported in : RLW2010(1)Raj691

mahesh bhagwati, j.1. prabhu lal, the appellant herein, was put to trial before the additional sessions judge, jhalawar who vide impugned judgment dated 10th december, 1986 convicted him in the offence under section 376 of ipc and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and a fine of rs. 250; in default of payment of fine to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 months.2. the prosecution case in brief is that:the prosecutrix in the afternoon of 24th august, 1984 went to draw water on the well of narayan patel. it was rainy season and drizzling. it is alleged that when she was drawing water from the well, the accused-appellant suddenly appeared and stood behind her. he lifted her in his lap and took her in the crop of maize. when she screamed, the appellant gagged her mouth by his hand. thereafter, he made her to lie straight on the ground, lifted her ghaghara, draw his penis from his dhoti he was wearing, put her both the legs on his shoulders and ravished her. it is alleged that when she raised a cry, he threatened to kill her. he left her only when he discharged semen. thereafter, he fled from there. having heard her screams, her sister-in-law chanda bai and one nanda, working in a nearby field came there. she narrated the incident to them, thereafter, she came to her house. there, she narrated the entire incident to her husband. when they were going to lodge the report in the police station, the accused armed with farsi blocked there way and threatened to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2009 (HC)

Chhagan Lal Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-30-2009

Reported in : RLW2009(2)Raj1490

guman singh, j.1. challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 19.2.2003 passed by learned addl. district & sessions judge (fast track), kama in sessions case no. 165/2002 whereby the accused-appellant chhagan lal was qonvicted and sentenced as under:under section 302 ipc:to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of rs. 1000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for six months.under section 376 ipc:to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of rs. 1000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for six months.under section 377 ipc:to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years and fine of rs. 1000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for six months.under section 201 ipc:to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years' and fine of rs. 1000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for six months.all the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.2. briefly stated, the prosecution case is that one nazar khan, resident of p.s. pahadi submitted a written report on 12.9.98 at 11.00 am to the station house officer, p.s. pahadi, district-bharatpur who had reached to the place of occurrence on receiving information about a dead body lying in a well at village pahadi. in the report, it was reported by nazar khan that on 11.9.98, his niece ruksina, aged 8 years, had gone to graze goats in nearby jungle as usual. when he was returning to his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2009 (HC)

Akhilesh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-20-2009

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2205; RLW2009(1)Raj746

..... . it was also stated in the report that on 17th april, 1998 his daughter kavita was married with akhilesh s/o dwarka prasad; the marriage took place at jaipur; the mediator was shri radheyshyam gupta - the uncle of akhilesh. he agreed to spend five to six lac rupees in the marriage but radheyshyam gupta, dwarka prasad, radhey mohan gupta, akhilesh and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 26 2009 (HC)

State of Rajasthan Vs. Hans Raj Singh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-26-2009

Reported in : 2009(3)WLN83

sangeet lodha, j.1. this special appeal is directed against order dt. 22.04.1997 whereby the writ petition preferred by the writ petitioner-respondent no. 1 (hereinafter referred as 'the respondent') herein against the order dt. 04.06.1990 passed by the board of revenue affirming the order dt. 08.07.1985 of collector, jalore directing resumption of 19.06 acre of surplus land vested in the government and order dt. 24.07.1990 dismissing the review application preferred by the respondent for review of order dt. 04.06.1990, has been allowed and accordingly, aforesaid orders dt. 08.07.1985, 04.06.1990 and 24.07.1990 have been quashed and set aside.2. the relevant facts in nutshell are that the ceiling proceedings were initiated against the respondent under the rajasthan imposition of ceiling on agriculture holdings act, 1973 (in short 'the act of 1973' hereinafter) but the same were dropped vide order dt. 19.08.1975 of sub divisional officer (in short 'sdm), jalore. however, the ceiling proceedings were reopened by the state government under section 15(1) of the act of 1973 and the matter was referred to the collector, jalore for decision afresh in accordance with law.3. after due consideration, the collector found that on 01.01.1973 the respondent had 170 bighas 8 biswas of land. the transfer of 70 bighas 14 biswas land made by the respondent no. 1 in favour of one shri khuman singh vide registered sale deed dt. 21.03.1972 was not found to be bona fide transfer, accordingly, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2009 (HC)

Gopal Singh Vs. the Election Tribunal-cum-additional Civil Judge (S.D. ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-19-2009

Reported in : RLW2009(3)Raj1878

sangeet lodha, j.1. this special appeal is directed against order dated 20.4.08 passed by the, learned single judge of this court, whereby the writ petition preferred by the appellant assailing the validity of judgment and decree dated 3.1.08 passed by the election tribunal(additional civil judge (s.d.), no. 3),jodhpur in election petition no. 15a/05, stands dismissed. by aforesaid judgment and decree dated 3.1.08 passed by the learned election tribunal, the election of the appellant as sarpanch has been declared null and void and accordingly, the post of the sarpanch, gram panchayat, anvana has been declared vacant.2. briefly stated the facts of the case are that in pursuance of the notification issued by the rajasthan election commission, the district election officer(panchayat), jodhpur issued a public notice in exercise of the powers conferred under rule 23 of rajasthan panchayati raj (election) rules, 1994 (in short the 'the rules, 1994' hereinafter), calling upon the various panchayat circles to elect panchas and sarpanch within the time specified in the notice. as per the programme notified.the last date for presentation of nominations was fixed as 30.1.05 and the scrutiny of nomination papers was to be made on the same day. the poll, if necessary was to be taken on 31.1.05.3. the appellant so also the respondent no. 2 presented their nomination in the prescribed form before the returning officer on the date fixed. the appellant raised an objection to the nomination of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2009 (HC)

Sriganganagar District Cricket Association and anr. Vs. State of Rajas ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-26-2009

Reported in : RLW2009(3)Raj2596

gopal krishan vyas, j.1. this writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the validity of impugned order dated 20.02.2009 passed by the assistant registrar (annex.-p/9) and praying for quashing the same. further, it is prayed that entire proceedings initiated pursuant to the complaint filed by shri radhey shyam goyal may also be quashed and it may be held that the entire proceedings initiated on the aforesaid complaint is without jurisdiction.2. according to facts of the case, it is stated in the writ petition that the petitioner district cricket association is affiliated to the rajasthan cricket association is a district level sports association registered under the rajasthan sports (registration, recognition & regulation) act, 2005 (in short, to be called hereinafter as 'the act of 2005'). the petitioner association had earlier preferred a writ petition before the jaipur bench of the rajasthan high court, in which, the petitioner association challenged order dated 30.01.2009 passed by respondent no. 4. the said writ petition filed by the petitioner association was registered as s.b. civil writ petition no. 1634/2009. the writ petition so filed earlier by the petitioner association was decided finally by this court at jaipur bench vide order dated 11.02.2009 (annex.-3). in that order, this court at jaipur bench, while taking note of the order passed by this very bench in s.b. civil writ petition no. 1031/2009, vijay singh choudhary v. state of rajasthan and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 20 2009 (HC)

Nisar Mohd. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-20-2009

Reported in : 2009(2)WLN187

prem shanker asopa, j.1. by this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof for quashing of the judgment of the sub divisional officer, jaipur-i dt. 02.09.1996 (anx.8) and those of board of revenue dt. 31.01.2003 (anx.13) and 11.03.2003 (anx.14) and has further prayed that the suit for correction of entries, declaration and perpetual injunction filed by the plaintiff-petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioner') against the defendant non petitioners no. 6 to 16 may kindly be ordered to be decreed. 2. briefly stated, the relevant facts of the case, are as under:3. that the petitioner filed a revenue suit for correction of entries, declaration and perpetual injunction against the defendant on petitioners regarding 60 bighas of land situated in jamdoli, tehsil and district jaipur which had been allotted to yasin khan, father of the petitioner, on account of his being a soldier, by the erstwhile jaipur state which had wrongly been entered partly as sawai chak and partly as charagarh and had been further wrongly placed at the disposal of the jaipur development authority (j.d.a.). the patta issued by the erstwhile jaipur state in favour of yasin khan, father of the petitioner, is on record as annexure-3, who died on 08.05.1992. subsequently, on the strength of the will, suit was filed by the petitioner on 04.05.1994 before the sub divisional officer, jaipur-i.4. j.d.a. filed written statement denying all .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //