Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: rajasthan Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 57 results (0.010 seconds)

Jul 29 2013 (HC)

Pushpa Devi Vs. Moti Lal

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-29-2013

..... shri jugal kishore will withdraw two suits and other proceedings if any, which are pending in civil court at sujangarh (rajasthan) or in any other courts as mentioned in the mediation report. d. that both the parties and their successor will not file any case or litigation against each other in respect of the movable and immovable properties subject matter of ..... between the parties has been made a part of the order passed by the hon'ble supreme court wherein the parties have settled the dispute as under:- a. that the mediation report may be taken on record and matter may be remanded to the hon'ble high court of rajasthan at jodhpur for issuance of the probate certificate to the parties .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2013 (HC)

Suresh Kumar Vs. Dwarka Das

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Sep-12-2013

..... also made endeavour to settle the dispute between both the siblings by way of sending this matter to mediation centre. in the mediation centre, the mediator has made all sincere efforts but nothing turned out and that effort of the court proved futile, therefore, the mediator has returned back the file to this court for its adjudication on merit. examining the lis involved in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2013 (HC)

Twincle @ Babi Vs. Purshottam

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Nov-14-2013

..... or her husband and was not an earning member. upon taking up of the matter, the learned counsel for the parties submitted that the matter had been discussed in the mediation center too but as the parties could not finally arrive at a mutually acceptable figure of the amount of maintenance, the proposition for settlement did not materialize. after having examined .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 2013 (HC)

Smt.Abha Trivedi Vs. Rajendra Kumar

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Sep-24-2013

..... the matrimonial home. 9 d.b. civil misc. appeal no.2322/2011 smt. abha trivedi vs. shri rajendra kumar gautam pw-3 p.p. bidiyasar stated that he tried to mediate between the parties and he was told about rajendra committing physical violence for dowry with the appellant. in the cross-examination, pw-3 admitted that in his presence, the respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 2013 (HC)

Pema and ors Vs. Board of Revenue and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Sep-11-2013

s.b. civil writ petition no.6496/2013 pema and ors. v/s the board of revenue and ors. order dt:11. 9/2013 1/3 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur order s.b. civil writ petition no.6496/2013 pema and ors. v/s the board of revenue and ors. date of order :::11. h september, 2013 present hon'ble dr. justice vineet kothari mr.deelip kawadia, for the petitioner. -- by the court:1. the petitioners pema, rama and nava, all sons of devaji dangi have approached this court by way of present writ petition under article 227 of the constitution of india being aggrieved by the order dtd.12.3.2013 of the board of revenue dismissing the revision petition no.ta/303/2013/udaipur pema and ors. v/s smt. panna bai and anr which was filed against the order dtd.27.12.2012 passed by the learned sub divisional officer, girva in appeal no.33/2010 whereby on an application filed by one smt. panna bai w/o gega ji dangi, who claimed to be daughter of heera lal, whose land in question stood mutated in favour of the present petitioners and smt. panna bai claimed that she was the only daughter of deceased heera lal and mutation enteries were required to be made in her favour condoning the delay of almost 35 years, the sdo s.b. civil writ petition no.6496/2013 pema and ors. v/s the board of revenue and ors. order dt:11. 9/2013 2/3 instituted an enquiry as to whether smt. panna bai w/o sh. gega ji was real and the only daughter of the deceased hera lal.2. mr. deelip kawadia, learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2013 (HC)

Lrs of Pat Ram Vs. Bhajanlal @ Bhajan Singh and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Feb-12-2013

(1) in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur order d.b. civil review petition no.94/2011 in d.b. civil special appeal (writ) no.02460/2008 lrs of patram versus bhajan lal @ bhajan singh & ors. date of order ::12. 02.2013 present hon'ble mr. justice govind mathur hon'ble mr. justice banwari lal sharma mr. sukesh bhati for the review-petitioner mr. chaitanya gahlot for the respondents (lrs of patram) by the court : in the year 1971-72, a piece of land measuring 18 bighas 8 biswas in chak no.2dd murabba no.162/62 was allotted to one mr. patram (now deceased) for temporary cultivation. a lease deed was accordingly executed. mr. patram submitted an application as per the provisions of sub-clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of rule 5 of the rajasthan colonisation (allotment of government land to post 1955 temporary cultivation lease holders and other landless persons in the rajasthan canal project area) rules, 1971. the competent authority in the year 1974 arrived at the conclusion that (2) temporary cultivator mr. patram was entitled to have allotment of 12 bighas 4 biswas of land for permanent cultivation. a challenge to the same was given by mr. patram with assertion that the entire chunk of land measuring 18 bighas 8 biswas was supposed to be allotted to him being unirrigated part of land. the claim of above-named patram came to be accepted under an order dated 17.05.1978. accordingly, a direction was given to allot 6 bighas 6 biswas of land to mr. patram. suffice to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 2013 (HC)

Amra and ors Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Nov-13-2013

1 d.b.civil writ petition no.6928/2013 amr.and ors.v/s state of rajasthan & ors.13.11.2013 hon'ble the chief justice mr.amitava roy hon'ble mr.justice p.k.lohra mr.rajesh shah for the petitioners.heard learned counsel for the petitioners.the instant application presented to initiate a public interest litigation discloses that the petitioners are permanent residents of village semari tehsil sarada district udaipur. they have stated that in samvat 2001 (equivalent to english calendar year 1944-45).a plot of land measuring 209 bigha 3 biswa of sabik araji no.2750 of patwar circle of village semari tehsil sarada was entered in the revenue record as bilanam. after the formation of the state of rajasthan in the year 1962, the grazing area of village semari was demarcated with land measuring 157 bigha 10 biswa. out of this, several plots were allotted by the government of rajasthan/sarpanch of the panchayat semari to various persons between samvat 2016 to 2022 (1959-60 to 1965-66).the lands allotted were thereafter entered in the revenue records in the name of the allottees. the petitioners have mentioned that a plot measuring 3 bigha of araji no.2750 was allotted to one late bhura, which was mutated in his name vide mutation no.487 dated 14.6.1971 in terms of the order of the sub tehsildar sarada. according to them, during the re-settlement, the land measuring 2 15-20 bigha of sabik araji no.2750 was reserved/fixed as grazing area towards the northern side of rebario ki dhani in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 2013 (HC)

HussaIn and ors Vs. Board of Revenue, Ajmer and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Nov-01-2013

-1- dbcivil special appeal no.864/2012 in sbcivil writ petition no.5477/2012 hussain & ors.v.board of revenue & ors.date of order :: 1st november, 2012 hon'ble mr.justice govind mathur hon'ble mr.justice r.s.chauhan mr.t.s.champawat, for the appellants...this appeal is directed against the order dated 25.7.2012 passed by learned single judge in sbcivil writ petition no.5477/2012. by the order impugned the writ petition preferred by the petitioner appellants, giving challenge to the orders dated 28.8.2003 and 24.1.2012 passed by the board of revenue, rajasthan, ajmer in appeal no.290/1998 and in review petition no.4478/2003 respectively, came to be rejected. the facts necessary to be noticed for adjudication of this appeal are that one shri basaya was holding agriculture land comprising khasr.nos.282, 308 and 457 in village shedwa, tehsil chohtan, district barmer. shri basaya in his lifetime partitioned the land aforesaid amongst his three sons viz. arab, sumar and gafoor. the land bearing khasr.nos.308 and 457 was under the share of gafoor, whereas the land bearing khasr.no.282 fell in the -2- share of sumar and arab jointly. shri sumar died unmarried and after his death the entire land under khasr.no.282 was mutated in the name of arab. the descendants of gafoor (respondents nos.6 to12) preferred a suit for declaration, revision of holding and permanent injunction as per provisions of sections 91, 88, 188 and 53 of the rajasthan tenancy act against the petitioners who are .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 2013 (HC)

Shanker Singh and ors Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Nov-11-2013

1 d.b.civil (pil) writ petition no.10217/2013 shanker singh & ors.v/s state of rajasthan & ors.11.11.2013 hon'ble the chief justice mr.amitava roy hon'ble mr.justice p.k.lohra mr.sajjan singh for the petitioners.heard learned counsel for the petitioners.the petitioners claim to be permanent residents of village ghadoi charnan, gram panchayat kalyanpura district barmer. they have averred that the gram panchayat kalyanpura, panchayat samiti balotra (respondent no.4) had illegally issued pattas in gochar land to madaram s/o kishnaram in khasr.no.155/45 patta no.2, bagaram s/o durgaram in khasr.no.78/5 patta no.21, gokalram s/o durgaram in khasr.no.78/5 patta no.22 and ruparam s/o durgaram in khasras no.78/5 and 155/45. thereafter, by its resolution dated 5.1.2013 converted the gochar land in dispute to abadi land. according to the petitioners.such grant of pattas is illegal and unauthorized. however, on the strength thereof, the aforementioned persons have trespassed on the gochar land, and have raised permanent and temporary constructions thereon in the month of july, 2012, whereupon the petitioners submitted an application before the respondent no.2 collector, barmer on 21.9.2012 seeking remedial intervention of the said authority. they have stated that thereafter, they submitted several representations before the different revenue authorities, but to no avail. referring to the decision of the 2 hon'ble apex court rendered in jagpal singh & ors.v/s state of punjab & ors.((2011 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2013 (HC)

Chhagan Lal Vs. Board of Revenue, Ajmer and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Jan-09-2013

s.b.c.w.p. no.10057/2012 chhagan lal vs. board of revenue & ors. order dt:09. 01/2013 1/2 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur order s.b. civil writ petition no.10057/2012 chhagan lal vs. board of revenue & ors. date of order :::09. h january 2013 present hon'ble dr. justice vineet kothari ms. vandana bhansali, for the petitioner. mr. manish shishodia, for the respondents. -- 1. heard learned counsel for the parties.2. this writ petition is directed against the order dated 14.09.2012 passed by the learned single member of board of revenue, whereby the stay order already granted in favour of petitioner on 04.05.2012 was vacated without assigning any reason.3. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the board of revenue has not assigned any reason for vacating the interim order granted in favour of petitioner and the respondents authorities may proceed with the mutation entries in favour of respondents, and therefore, the matter may be remanded back to the board of revenue for passing fresh and reasoned order.4. mr. manish shishodia, learned counsel for the respondents, however, vehemently opposed these contentions and s.b.c.w.p. no.10057/2012 chhagan lal vs. board of revenue & ors. order dt:09. 01/2013 2/2 submitted that in view of the averments made in the application and its counter, it was not necessary for the board of revenue to record reasons while vacating the interim order dated 04.05.2012.5. having heard learned counsel for the parties, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //