Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: rajasthan Year: 2013 Page 5 of about 57 results (0.012 seconds)

Oct 17 2013 (HC)

Smt. Rajbala Vs. State and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Oct-17-2013

d.b.civil special appeal (w) no.837/2013. smt. rajbala versus state & anr. // 1 // 38 d.b.civil special appeal (w) no.837/2013. smt. rajbala versus state & anr.date of order :: 17th october 2013. hon'ble mr.justice dinesh maheshwari hon'ble mr.justice p.k.lohra mr.m.l.rajpurohit, for the appellant. ms.pratistha dave, for the respondents. by the court: (per dinesh maheshwari j.) with the consent and at the request of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter has been heard finally at this stage itself. the petitioner-appellant, said to have been appointed on compassionate grounds on the post of safai karamchari on 12.12.1994 after demise of her husband, has filed the writ petition (cwp no.9709/2013) stating the grievance that though for illiteracy, her date of birth came to be mentioned in the service record as 25.09.1953 . but, her correct date of birth was 13.04.1966 .; and even the medical board found her age between 35 to 40 years in the year 2006 but the respondents did not carry out the necessary correction in the service record despite representation and were seeking to retire her from service, while taking her date of birth as 25.09.1953. the learned single judge of this court issued notices in the said writ petition on 02.09.2013 but rejected the prayer for interim relief. hence, the petitioner-appellant has filed this intra-court appeal. d.b.civil special appeal (w) no.837/2013. smt. rajbala versus state & anr. // 2 // at the motion-stage, in response to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 2013 (HC)

Union of India and anr Vs. Narhari Thakar and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Oct-28-2013

saw no.904/2013 union of india & anr. versus nahari thakkar & anr. 1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur :order: union of india & anr. versus nahari thakkar & anr. d.b.civil special appeal (w) no.904/2013 date of order : 28th october 2013 present hon ble mr.justice dinesh maheshwari hon ble mr.justice p.k.lohra mr.v.k.mathur for the appellants reportable by the court: (per dinesh maheshwari,j.) by way of this intra-court appeal, the union of india and the chief post master general, rajasthan seek to question the order dated 18.07.2013 passed in s.b.civil writ petition no.4573/2010 whereby, a learned single judge of this court has rejected their challenge to the order dated 04.02.2010, as passed by the deputy commissioner for persons with disabilities in case no.1/1024/08-09, which was registered on a complaint made by the present respondent no.1, a person with 100% visual impairment, stating violation of section 47 of the persons with disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) act, 1995 [ the act / the act of 1995 ].when the appellants dispensed with his services on an application seeking voluntary retirement. in brief, the relevant facts and background aspects of the matter are as follows: the respondent no.1 joined the saw no.904/2013 union of india & anr. versus nahari thakkar & anr. 2 services with the appellants on the post of postal assistant on 11.03.1983; and was, in the due cours.of time, promoted to the post .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2013 (HC)

Nityesh and ors Vs. State and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Dec-17-2013

1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur s.b.criminal misc. petition no.2716/2013 nityesh soni & ors.vs.state of rajasthan & anr. date of order :: 17.12.2013 hon ble ms.justice nirmaljit kaur mr.suresh kumbhat, counsel for the petitioner. mr.ashok prajapat, counsel for the state. mr.mahesh bora, sr.adv.with ms.sushma dhara, for the complainant. nirmaljit kaur, j. (oral).this is criminal misc. petition under section 482 cr.p.c.for quashing of fir no.194/2008 of p.s.mahila thana & criminal proceeding pending vide criminal case no.141/2011 before the learned munsif district, jodhpur metropolitan. during the pendency of criminal misc. petition no.2777/2012, the parties entered into the compromise before this court. the statement of the petitioner no.1, petitioner no.2 and respondent no.2 was recorded to the said effect. in pursuance to the said compromise and the order dated 24.10.2013 passed in s.b.cr. misc. petition no.2777/2012, the present petition has been filed under section 482 cr.p.c.for quashing of the fir no.194/2008. the petitioner no.2, who is appearing in his private capacity as also counsel on behalf of the petitioner no.1 and 3, who are his son and wife respectively, has handed over a banker's cheque 2 no.481420 dated 14.12.2013 to the tune of rs.7,50,000/- to the respondent no.2 who is present in the court along with learned counsel for the complainant. she has got her statement recorded separately. in her statement, it is stated by her that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2013 (HC)

Harvinder Singh and ors Vs. State and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Dec-19-2013

1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur s.b.criminal misc. petition no.2933/2013 harvinder singh & ors.versus state of rajasthan & anr. date of order :: 19.12.2013 hon ble ms.justice nirmaljit kaur mr.s.p.sharma, for the petitioners.mr.mahipal bishnoi, public prosecutor. mr.vineet jain, for the complainant. nirmaljit kaur, j. (oral).this is criminal misc. petition under section 482 cr.p.c.for quashing of criminal proceeding pending trial in criminal case no.205/2011 before the learned additional chief judicial magistrate (paryavaran) pali on the ground of compromise arrived between the parties. learned counsel for the respondent-complainant states that the matter has been compromised and he has instruction to state that the complainant has no objection if the criminal proceedings pending trial in criminal case no.205/2011 before the learned additional chief judicial magistrate, (paryavaran).pali is quashed. it is also evident from the order placed on record dated 13.12.2013 as annex.p/5 and p/6 that in pursuance to the said compromise, the offences under section 406, 323 ipc were 2 compounded. thus, this court is satisfied that the compromise is genuine. the dispute herein, is personal in nature. the apex court in the case of 'madan mohan abbot v. state of punjab' reported as (2008) 4 scc582emphasised in para no.6 as follows :- 6. we need to emphasize that it is perhaps advisable that in disputes where the question involved is of a purely personal nature, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2013 (HC)

Chhagan Lal Vs. Board of Revenue, Ajmer and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Jan-09-2013

s.b.c.w.p. no.10057/2012 chhagan lal vs. board of revenue & ors. order dt:09. 01/2013 1/2 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur order s.b. civil writ petition no.10057/2012 chhagan lal vs. board of revenue & ors. date of order :::09. h january 2013 present hon'ble dr. justice vineet kothari ms. vandana bhansali, for the petitioner. mr. manish shishodia, for the respondents. -- 1. heard learned counsel for the parties.2. this writ petition is directed against the order dated 14.09.2012 passed by the learned single member of board of revenue, whereby the stay order already granted in favour of petitioner on 04.05.2012 was vacated without assigning any reason.3. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the board of revenue has not assigned any reason for vacating the interim order granted in favour of petitioner and the respondents authorities may proceed with the mutation entries in favour of respondents, and therefore, the matter may be remanded back to the board of revenue for passing fresh and reasoned order.4. mr. manish shishodia, learned counsel for the respondents, however, vehemently opposed these contentions and s.b.c.w.p. no.10057/2012 chhagan lal vs. board of revenue & ors. order dt:09. 01/2013 2/2 submitted that in view of the averments made in the application and its counter, it was not necessary for the board of revenue to record reasons while vacating the interim order dated 04.05.2012.5. having heard learned counsel for the parties, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2013 (HC)

Jaykishan @ Dhansu Vs. State of Raj

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-23-2013

d.b. criminal parole petition no.6864/2013 1 d.b. criminal parole petition no.6864/2013 jai kishan vs. state of rajasthan .. date of order ::23. d july 2013 hon'ble mr. justice dinesh maheshwari hon'ble mr. justice vijay bishnoi by post. mr.k.r.bishnoi, government counsel by the court: this petition has been registered on the letters received from the prisoner-convict jai kishan alias dhansu son of ram babu baghel, resident of nangla bhawani, district firozabad (up), who is at present serving the sentence in the central jail at jodhpur. in one of the letters, the petitioner has made the prayer for consideration of his case for transfer to the central jail at bharatpur with reference to the fact that reaching jodhpur was extremely difficult and of hardship to his family. in the other petition, the petitioner has prayed for consideration of his case for grant of 20 days' parole. as per the reply submissions, as on 30.06.2013, the petitioner-convict has served the sentence for a period of about 7 years 8 months and 10 days inclusive of jail remissions of 7 months and 2 days. it is pointed out that earlier, the petitioner was transferred from central jail, ajmer to central jail, udaipur and thereafter, in compliance of the order passed by this court in petition d.b. criminal parole petition no.6864/2013 2 no.7108/2008, he was transferred to central jail, bharatpur. however, according to the respondents, on the complaints and due to indiscipline, the petitioner was transferred .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

i.C.i.C.i.Lombard G.i.C.Ltd Vs. Smt. Narayani Devi and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Sep-25-2013

1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur :judgment: s.b. civil misc. appeal no.1584/2013 icici lombard general insurance company ltd., jaipur vs. smt. narayani devi & ors. date of judgement 25th september, 2013 present hon'ble mr. justice arun bhansali mr. vinay kothari, for the appellant. ---- by the court: heard learned counsel for the appellant. this appeal is directed against judgment and award dated 06.06.2013 passed by the motor accident claims tribunal, jaitaran ('the tribunal'), whereby, for the death of one kuldeep singh, compensation to the tune of rs.18,10,800/- alongwith interest has been awarded by the tribunal. it is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that excessive compensation has been awarded by the tribunal as amount under various heads have been awarded without taken into consideration the facts involved in the present case. the award of compensation under the head of future prospects was contested. it was also submitted that three brothers of the deceased were claimants and taking the dependents as seven, 1/5th deduction for personal expenses only has been made, which is contrary to the law laid down by hon'ble supreme 2 court. it was further submitted that as the deceased was a government servant not only that compassionate appointment is likely to be granted to the family, pension to the tune of rs.5,500/- per month and rs.7,00,000/- as a one time payment has been awarded to the family and, consequently, the said aspect .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 2013 (HC)

National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Ganpat Lal and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Sep-24-2013

1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur :judgment: s.b. civil misc. appeal no.329/1999 national insurance company, branch bhilwara, divisional, jodhpur vs. lrs of ganpat lal & ors. s.b. civil cross objection no.2/2004 lrs of ganpat lal & ors. vs. national insurance company, branch bhilwara, divisional, jodhpur date of judgement 24th september, 2013 present hon'ble mr. justice arun bhansali mr. s.r. paliwal on behalf of mr. anil bachhawat, for the appellant. ms. rekha borana ) mr. anurag shukla ) mr. rakesh sinha ), for the respondents. ---- by the court: heard learned counsel for the parties. this appeal by the insurer is directed against judgment and award dated 12.01.1999 made by the motor accident claims tribunal, bhilwara ('the tribunal'), whereby, for the death of one pusha lal on 20.12.1990, a sum of rs.62,000/- has been awarded as compensation. while the appellant insurance company is aggrieved against the liability imposed, the claimants have filed cross- objections for enhancement of the award. the facts in brief may be noticed that on 20.12.1990 deceased pusha lal was travelling in a car no.rj06-176 from hameergarh to bhilwara; when at around 06:30 am the car collided with a truck no.rne-5301 from behind, which resulted 2 in death of said pusha lal. it was claimed that pusha lal was aged about 17 years and was contributing to the family to the extent of rs.600/- per month. the claimants claimed compensation to the tune of rs.6,25,000/- under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 2013 (HC)

Bhagyadeep Enterprises Pvt.Ltd Vs. None

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Sep-24-2013

1 sb company petitions nos.5/2013, 4/2013, and 6/2013 1. s.b.company petition no.5/2013 miraj multicolour private ltd.versus none 2. s.b.company petition no.4/2013 bhagyadeep enterprises private ltd.versus none 3. s.b.company petition no.6/2013 hy d co.tiles private ltd.versus none date of order: 24th september 2013 hon'ble mr.justice dinesh maheshwari mr.dinesh mehta, for the petitioner/s. mr.k.c.meena official liquidator is present in person with the counsel ms.madhulika vyas ms.garima chauhan for mr.v.k.mathur, for the uoi by the court: these petitions, being co-related, have been considered together and are taken up for disposal by this common order. company petition no.5/2013 this is a petition filed by miraj multicolour private ltd., a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 [ the act of 1956 ].having its registered office at b-6, udhyog vihar, sukher, udaipur (transferee company) under section 394 of the act of 1956 for sanctioning the scheme of amalgamation of the petitioner company with bhagyadeep enterprises private ltd., (transferor company no.1).and hy d co.tiles private ltd.(transferor company no.2) under sections 391 and 394. the transferors companies are also incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 and are having their respective registered offices at 6, udhyog vihar, sukher, udaipur. 2 sb company petitions nos.5/2013, 4/2013, and 6/2013 the petitioner company had earlier moved an application under section 391 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 2013 (HC)

Hy Decore Tiles Pvt.Ltd Vs. None

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Sep-24-2013

1 sb company petitions nos.5/2013, 4/2013, and 6/2013 1. s.b.company petition no.5/2013 miraj multicolour private ltd.versus none 2. s.b.company petition no.4/2013 bhagyadeep enterprises private ltd.versus none 3. s.b.company petition no.6/2013 hy d co.tiles private ltd.versus none date of order: 24th september 2013 hon'ble mr.justice dinesh maheshwari mr.dinesh mehta, for the petitioner/s. mr.k.c.meena official liquidator is present in person with the counsel ms.madhulika vyas ms.garima chauhan for mr.v.k.mathur, for the uoi by the court: these petitions, being co-related, have been considered together and are taken up for disposal by this common order. company petition no.5/2013 this is a petition filed by miraj multicolour private ltd., a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 [ the act of 1956 ].having its registered office at b-6, udhyog vihar, sukher, udaipur (transferee company) under section 394 of the act of 1956 for sanctioning the scheme of amalgamation of the petitioner company with bhagyadeep enterprises private ltd., (transferor company no.1).and hy d co.tiles private ltd.(transferor company no.2) under sections 391 and 394. the transferors companies are also incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 and are having their respective registered offices at 6, udhyog vihar, sukher, udaipur. 2 sb company petitions nos.5/2013, 4/2013, and 6/2013 the petitioner company had earlier moved an application under section 391 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //